Commit 5e187a01 authored by Lyude Paul's avatar Lyude Paul

drm/dp_mst: Check payload count in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check()

It occurred to me that we never actually check this! So let's start
doing that.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190111005343.17443-20-lyude@redhat.com
parent eceae147
......@@ -3641,7 +3641,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state)
{
struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
int avail_slots = 63;
int avail_slots = 63, payload_count = 0;
list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &mst_state->vcpis, next) {
/* Releasing VCPI is always OK-even if the port is gone */
......@@ -3661,6 +3661,12 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
avail_slots + vcpi->vcpi);
return -ENOSPC;
}
if (++payload_count > mgr->max_payloads) {
DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] state %p has too many payloads (max=%d)\n",
mgr, mst_state, mgr->max_payloads);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] mst state %p VCPI avail=%d used=%d\n",
mgr, mst_state, avail_slots,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment