sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in times()/clock_gettime()
Commit: 6e998916 ("sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency") fixed a problem whereby clock_nanosleep() followed by clock_gettime() could allow a task to wake early. It addressed the problem by calling the scheduling classes update_curr() when the cputimer starts. Said change induced a considerable performance regression on the syscalls times() and clock_gettimes(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID). There are some debuggers and applications that monitor their own performance that accidentally depend on the performance of these specific calls. This patch mitigates the performace loss by prefetching data in the CPU cache, as stalls due to cache misses appear to be where most time is spent in our benchmarks. Here are the performance gain of this patch over v4.7-rc7 on a Sandy Bridge box with 32 logical cores and 2 NUMA nodes. The test is repeated with a variable number of threads, from 2 to 4*num_cpus; the results are in seconds and correspond to the average of 10 runs; the percentage gain is computed with (before-after)/before so a positive value is an improvement (it's faster). The improvement varies between a few percents for 5-20 threads and more than 10% for 2 or >20 threads. pound_clock_gettime: threads 4.7-rc7 patched 4.7-rc7 [num] [secs] [secs (percent)] 2 3.48 3.06 ( 11.83%) 5 3.33 3.25 ( 2.40%) 8 3.37 3.26 ( 3.30%) 12 3.32 3.37 ( -1.60%) 21 4.01 3.90 ( 2.74%) 30 3.63 3.36 ( 7.41%) 48 3.71 3.11 ( 16.27%) 79 3.75 3.16 ( 15.74%) 110 3.81 3.25 ( 14.80%) 128 3.88 3.31 ( 14.76%) pound_times: threads 4.7-rc7 patched 4.7-rc7 [num] [secs] [secs (percent)] 2 3.65 3.25 ( 11.03%) 5 3.45 3.17 ( 7.92%) 8 3.52 3.22 ( 8.69%) 12 3.29 3.36 ( -2.04%) 21 4.07 3.92 ( 3.78%) 30 3.87 3.40 ( 12.17%) 48 3.79 3.16 ( 16.61%) 79 3.88 3.28 ( 15.42%) 110 3.90 3.38 ( 13.35%) 128 4.00 3.38 ( 15.45%) pound_clock_gettime and pound_clock_gettime are two benchmarks included in the MMTests framework. They launch a given number of threads which repeatedly call times() or clock_gettimes(). The results above can be reproduced with cloning MMTests from github.com and running the "poundtime" workload: $ git clone https://github.com/gormanm/mmtests.git $ cd mmtests $ cp configs/config-global-dhp__workload_poundtime config $ ./run-mmtests.sh --run-monitor $(uname -r) The above will run "poundtime" measuring the kernel currently running on the machine; Once a new kernel is installed and the machine rebooted, running again $ cd mmtests $ ./run-mmtests.sh --run-monitor $(uname -r) will produce results to compare with. A comparison table will be output with: $ cd mmtests/work/log $ ../../compare-kernels.sh the table will contain a lot of entries; grepping for "Amean" (as in "arithmetic mean") will give the tables presented above. The source code for the two benchmarks is reported at the end of this changelog for clairity. The cache misses addressed by this patch were found using a combination of `perf top`, `perf record` and `perf annotate`. The incriminated lines were found to be struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; and delta_exec = now - curr->exec_start; in the function update_curr() from kernel/sched/fair.c. This patch prefetches the data from memory just before update_curr is called in the interested execution path. A comparison of the total number of cycles before and after the patch follows; the data is obtained using `perf stat -r 10 -ddd <program>` running over the same sequence of number of threads used above (a positive gain is an improvement): threads cycles before cycles after gain 2 19,699,563,964 +-1.19% 17,358,917,517 +-1.85% 11.88% 5 47,401,089,566 +-2.96% 45,103,730,829 +-0.97% 4.85% 8 80,923,501,004 +-3.01% 71,419,385,977 +-0.77% 11.74% 12 112,326,485,473 +-0.47% 110,371,524,403 +-0.47% 1.74% 21 193,455,574,299 +-0.72% 180,120,667,904 +-0.36% 6.89% 30 315,073,519,013 +-1.64% 271,222,225,950 +-1.29% 13.92% 48 321,969,515,332 +-1.48% 273,353,977,321 +-1.16% 15.10% 79 337,866,003,422 +-0.97% 289,462,481,538 +-1.05% 14.33% 110 338,712,691,920 +-0.78% 290,574,233,170 +-0.77% 14.21% 128 348,384,794,006 +-0.50% 292,691,648,206 +-0.66% 15.99% A comparison of cache miss vs total cache loads ratios, before and after the patch (again from the `perf stat -r 10 -ddd <program>` tables): threads L1 misses/total*100 L1 misses/total*100 gain before after 2 7.43 +-4.90% 7.36 +-4.70% 0.94% 5 13.09 +-4.74% 13.52 +-3.73% -3.28% 8 13.79 +-5.61% 12.90 +-3.27% 6.45% 12 11.57 +-2.44% 8.71 +-1.40% 24.72% 21 12.39 +-3.92% 9.97 +-1.84% 19.53% 30 13.91 +-2.53% 11.73 +-2.28% 15.67% 48 13.71 +-1.59% 12.32 +-1.97% 10.14% 79 14.44 +-0.66% 13.40 +-1.06% 7.20% 110 15.86 +-0.50% 14.46 +-0.59% 8.83% 128 16.51 +-0.32% 15.06 +-0.78% 8.78% As a final note, the following shows the evolution of performance figures in the "poundtime" benchmark and pinpoints commit 6e998916 ("sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency") as a major source of degradation, mostly unaddressed to this day (figures expressed in seconds). pound_clock_gettime: threads parent of 6e998916 4.7-rc7 6e998916 itself 2 2.23 3.68 ( -64.56%) 3.48 (-55.48%) 5 2.83 3.78 ( -33.42%) 3.33 (-17.43%) 8 2.84 4.31 ( -52.12%) 3.37 (-18.76%) 12 3.09 3.61 ( -16.74%) 3.32 ( -7.17%) 21 3.14 4.63 ( -47.36%) 4.01 (-27.71%) 30 3.28 5.75 ( -75.37%) 3.63 (-10.80%) 48 3.02 6.05 (-100.56%) 3.71 (-22.99%) 79 2.88 6.30 (-118.90%) 3.75 (-30.26%) 110 2.95 6.46 (-119.00%) 3.81 (-29.24%) 128 3.05 6.42 (-110.08%) 3.88 (-27.04%) pound_times: threads parent of 6e998916 4.7-rc7 6e998916 itself 2 2.27 3.73 ( -64.71%) 3.65 (-61.14%) 5 2.78 3.77 ( -35.56%) 3.45 (-23.98%) 8 2.79 4.41 ( -57.71%) 3.52 (-26.05%) 12 3.02 3.56 ( -17.94%) 3.29 ( -9.08%) 21 3.10 4.61 ( -48.74%) 4.07 (-31.34%) 30 3.33 5.75 ( -72.53%) 3.87 (-16.01%) 48 2.96 6.06 (-105.04%) 3.79 (-28.10%) 79 2.88 6.24 (-116.83%) 3.88 (-34.81%) 110 2.98 6.37 (-114.08%) 3.90 (-31.12%) 128 3.10 6.35 (-104.61%) 4.00 (-28.87%) The source code of the two benchmarks follows. To compile the two: NR_THREADS=42 for FILE in pound_times pound_clock_gettime; do gcc -lrt -O2 -lpthread -DNUM_THREADS=$NR_THREADS $FILE.c -o $FILE done ==== BEGIN pound_times.c ==== struct tms start; void *pound (void *threadid) { struct tms end; int oldutime = 0; int utime; int i; for (i = 0; i < 5000000 / NUM_THREADS; i++) { times(&end); utime = ((int)end.tms_utime - (int)start.tms_utime); if (oldutime > utime) { printf("utime decreased, was %d, now %d!\n", oldutime, utime); } oldutime = utime; } pthread_exit(NULL); } int main() { pthread_t th[NUM_THREADS]; long i; times(&start); for (i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) { pthread_create (&th[i], NULL, pound, (void *)i); } pthread_exit(NULL); return 0; } ==== END pound_times.c ==== ==== BEGIN pound_clock_gettime.c ==== void *pound (void *threadid) { struct timespec ts; int rc, i; unsigned long prev = 0, this = 0; for (i = 0; i < 5000000 / NUM_THREADS; i++) { rc = clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &ts); if (rc < 0) perror("clock_gettime"); this = (ts.tv_sec * 1000000000) + ts.tv_nsec; if (0 && this < prev) printf("%lu ns timewarp at iteration %d\n", prev - this, i); prev = this; } pthread_exit(NULL); } int main() { pthread_t th[NUM_THREADS]; long rc, i; pid_t pgid; for (i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++) { rc = pthread_create(&th[i], NULL, pound, (void *)i); if (rc < 0) perror("pthread_create"); } pthread_exit(NULL); return 0; } ==== END pound_clock_gettime.c ==== Suggested-by:Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470385316-15027-2-git-send-email-ggherdovich@suse.czSigned-off-by:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment