Commit 64f3967c authored by Liping Zhang's avatar Liping Zhang Committed by Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: ctnetlink: acquire ct->lock before operating nf_ct_seqadj

We should acquire the ct->lock before accessing or modifying the
nf_ct_seqadj, as another CPU may modify the nf_ct_seqadj at the same
time during its packet proccessing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
parent 53b56da8
......@@ -417,8 +417,7 @@ dump_ct_seq_adj(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_ct_seqadj *seq, int type)
return -1;
}
static int ctnetlink_dump_ct_seq_adj(struct sk_buff *skb,
const struct nf_conn *ct)
static int ctnetlink_dump_ct_seq_adj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct)
{
struct nf_conn_seqadj *seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
struct nf_ct_seqadj *seq;
......@@ -426,15 +425,20 @@ static int ctnetlink_dump_ct_seq_adj(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!(ct->status & IPS_SEQ_ADJUST) || !seqadj)
return 0;
spin_lock_bh(&ct->lock);
seq = &seqadj->seq[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL];
if (dump_ct_seq_adj(skb, seq, CTA_SEQ_ADJ_ORIG) == -1)
return -1;
goto err;
seq = &seqadj->seq[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY];
if (dump_ct_seq_adj(skb, seq, CTA_SEQ_ADJ_REPLY) == -1)
return -1;
goto err;
spin_unlock_bh(&ct->lock);
return 0;
err:
spin_unlock_bh(&ct->lock);
return -1;
}
static int ctnetlink_dump_id(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_conn *ct)
......@@ -1637,11 +1641,12 @@ ctnetlink_change_seq_adj(struct nf_conn *ct,
if (!seqadj)
return 0;
spin_lock_bh(&ct->lock);
if (cda[CTA_SEQ_ADJ_ORIG]) {
ret = change_seq_adj(&seqadj->seq[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL],
cda[CTA_SEQ_ADJ_ORIG]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
goto err;
set_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status);
}
......@@ -1650,12 +1655,16 @@ ctnetlink_change_seq_adj(struct nf_conn *ct,
ret = change_seq_adj(&seqadj->seq[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY],
cda[CTA_SEQ_ADJ_REPLY]);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
goto err;
set_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&ct->lock);
return 0;
err:
spin_unlock_bh(&ct->lock);
return ret;
}
static int
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment