Commit 6740a845 authored by Alex Elder's avatar Alex Elder Committed by Alex Elder

libceph: make ceph_con_revoke() a msg operation

ceph_con_revoke() is passed both a message and a ceph connection.
Now that any message associated with a connection holds a pointer
to that connection, there's no need to provide the connection when
revoking a message.

This has the added benefit of precluding the possibility of the
providing the wrong connection pointer.  If the message's connection
pointer is null, it is not being tracked by any connection, so
revoking it is a no-op.  This is supported as a convenience for
upper layers, so they can revoke a message that is not actually
"in flight."

Rename the function ceph_msg_revoke() to reflect that it is really
an operation on a message, not a connection.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
parent 92ce034b
......@@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ extern void ceph_con_open(struct ceph_connection *con,
extern bool ceph_con_opened(struct ceph_connection *con);
extern void ceph_con_close(struct ceph_connection *con);
extern void ceph_con_send(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg);
extern void ceph_con_revoke(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg);
extern void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg);
extern void ceph_con_revoke_message(struct ceph_connection *con,
struct ceph_msg *msg);
extern void ceph_con_keepalive(struct ceph_connection *con);
......
......@@ -2421,8 +2421,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_con_send);
/*
* Revoke a message that was previously queued for send
*/
void ceph_con_revoke(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg)
void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg)
{
struct ceph_connection *con = msg->con;
if (!con)
return; /* Message not in our possession */
mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
if (!list_empty(&msg->list_head)) {
dout("%s %p msg %p - was on queue\n", __func__, con, msg);
......
......@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void __send_prepared_auth_request(struct ceph_mon_client *monc, int len)
monc->pending_auth = 1;
monc->m_auth->front.iov_len = len;
monc->m_auth->hdr.front_len = cpu_to_le32(len);
ceph_con_revoke(&monc->con, monc->m_auth);
ceph_msg_revoke(monc->m_auth);
ceph_msg_get(monc->m_auth); /* keep our ref */
ceph_con_send(&monc->con, monc->m_auth);
}
......@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void __send_prepared_auth_request(struct ceph_mon_client *monc, int len)
static void __close_session(struct ceph_mon_client *monc)
{
dout("__close_session closing mon%d\n", monc->cur_mon);
ceph_con_revoke(&monc->con, monc->m_auth);
ceph_msg_revoke(monc->m_auth);
ceph_con_close(&monc->con);
monc->con.private = NULL;
monc->cur_mon = -1;
......@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void __send_subscribe(struct ceph_mon_client *monc)
msg->front.iov_len = p - msg->front.iov_base;
msg->hdr.front_len = cpu_to_le32(msg->front.iov_len);
ceph_con_revoke(&monc->con, msg);
ceph_msg_revoke(msg);
ceph_con_send(&monc->con, ceph_msg_get(msg));
monc->sub_sent = jiffies | 1; /* never 0 */
......@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static void __resend_generic_request(struct ceph_mon_client *monc)
for (p = rb_first(&monc->generic_request_tree); p; p = rb_next(p)) {
req = rb_entry(p, struct ceph_mon_generic_request, node);
ceph_con_revoke(&monc->con, req->request);
ceph_msg_revoke(req->request);
ceph_con_send(&monc->con, ceph_msg_get(req->request));
}
}
......
......@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static void __unregister_request(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc,
if (req->r_osd) {
/* make sure the original request isn't in flight. */
ceph_con_revoke(&req->r_osd->o_con, req->r_request);
ceph_msg_revoke(req->r_request);
list_del_init(&req->r_osd_item);
if (list_empty(&req->r_osd->o_requests) &&
......@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static void __unregister_request(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc,
static void __cancel_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req)
{
if (req->r_sent && req->r_osd) {
ceph_con_revoke(&req->r_osd->o_con, req->r_request);
ceph_msg_revoke(req->r_request);
req->r_sent = 0;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment