Commit 74f9ce1c authored by George Wang's avatar George Wang Committed by Dave Chinner

xfs: use percpu_counter_read_positive for mp->m_icount

Function percpu_counter_read just return the current counter, which can be
negative. This will cause the checking of "allocated inode
counts <= m_maxicount" false positive. Use percpu_counter_read_positive can
solve this problem, and be consistent with the purpose to introduce percpu
mechanism to xfs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGeorge Wang <xuw2015@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
parent 5ebe6afa
......@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc(
*/
newlen = args.mp->m_ialloc_inos;
if (args.mp->m_maxicount &&
percpu_counter_read(&args.mp->m_icount) + newlen >
percpu_counter_read_positive(&args.mp->m_icount) + newlen >
args.mp->m_maxicount)
return -ENOSPC;
args.minlen = args.maxlen = args.mp->m_ialloc_blks;
......@@ -1339,10 +1339,13 @@ xfs_dialloc(
* If we have already hit the ceiling of inode blocks then clear
* okalloc so we scan all available agi structures for a free
* inode.
*
* Read rough value of mp->m_icount by percpu_counter_read_positive,
* which will sacrifice the preciseness but improve the performance.
*/
if (mp->m_maxicount &&
percpu_counter_read(&mp->m_icount) + mp->m_ialloc_inos >
mp->m_maxicount) {
percpu_counter_read_positive(&mp->m_icount) + mp->m_ialloc_inos
> mp->m_maxicount) {
noroom = 1;
okalloc = 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment