Commit 75e45d51 authored by Dongsheng Yang's avatar Dongsheng Yang Committed by Ingo Molnar
parent d277d868
......@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
struct autogroup *ag;
int err;
if (nice < -20 || nice > 19)
if (nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
return -EINVAL;
err = security_task_setnice(current, nice);
......
......@@ -2993,7 +2993,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
unsigned long flags;
struct rq *rq;
if (task_nice(p) == nice || nice < -20 || nice > 19)
if (task_nice(p) == nice || nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
return;
/*
* We have to be careful, if called from sys_setpriority(),
......@@ -3072,10 +3072,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(nice, int, increment)
increment = 40;
nice = task_nice(current) + increment;
if (nice < -20)
nice = -20;
if (nice > 19)
nice = 19;
if (nice < MIN_NICE)
nice = MIN_NICE;
if (nice > MAX_NICE)
nice = MAX_NICE;
if (increment < 0 && !can_nice(current, nice))
return -EPERM;
......@@ -3623,7 +3623,7 @@ static int sched_copy_attr(struct sched_attr __user *uattr,
* XXX: do we want to be lenient like existing syscalls; or do we want
* to be strict and return an error on out-of-bounds values?
*/
attr->sched_nice = clamp(attr->sched_nice, -20, 19);
attr->sched_nice = clamp(attr->sched_nice, MIN_NICE, MAX_NICE);
out:
return ret;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment