drm/i915/guc/ct: Drop guards in enable/disable calls

We track the status of the GuC much more closely now and we expect the
enable/disable functions to be correctly called only once. If this isn't
true we do want to flag it as a flow failure (via the BUG_ON in the ctch
functions) and not silently ignore the call.
Suggested-by: default avatarMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
parent e627ad50
......@@ -862,9 +862,6 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
struct intel_guc_ct_channel *ctch = &ct->host_channel;
if (ctch->enabled)
return 0;
return ctch_enable(guc, ctch);
}
......@@ -877,8 +874,5 @@ void intel_guc_ct_disable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
struct intel_guc_ct_channel *ctch = &ct->host_channel;
if (!ctch->enabled)
return;
ctch_disable(guc, ctch);
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment