Commit 8423a9aa authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller

[IPV6]: Protect RTM_GETRULE table entry with IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES ifdef

This is how IPv4 handles this case too.

Based upon a patch from Andrew Morton.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 8ce11e6a
...@@ -3529,7 +3529,9 @@ static struct rtnetlink_link inet6_rtnetlink_table[RTM_NR_MSGTYPES] = { ...@@ -3529,7 +3529,9 @@ static struct rtnetlink_link inet6_rtnetlink_table[RTM_NR_MSGTYPES] = {
[RTM_DELROUTE - RTM_BASE] = { .doit = inet6_rtm_delroute, }, [RTM_DELROUTE - RTM_BASE] = { .doit = inet6_rtm_delroute, },
[RTM_GETROUTE - RTM_BASE] = { .doit = inet6_rtm_getroute, [RTM_GETROUTE - RTM_BASE] = { .doit = inet6_rtm_getroute,
.dumpit = inet6_dump_fib, }, .dumpit = inet6_dump_fib, },
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
[RTM_GETRULE - RTM_BASE] = { .dumpit = fib6_rules_dump, }, [RTM_GETRULE - RTM_BASE] = { .dumpit = fib6_rules_dump, },
#endif
}; };
static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp) static void __ipv6_ifa_notify(int event, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment