Commit 8930ed80 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logic

The conditions under which deadlock detection is conducted are unclear
and undocumented.

Add constants instead of using 0/1 and provide a selection function
which hides the additional debug dependency from the calling code.

Add comments where needed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140522031949.947264874@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent c051b21f
......@@ -66,12 +66,13 @@ void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
* the deadlock. We print when we return. act_waiter can be NULL in
* case of a remove waiter operation.
*/
void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(int detect, struct rt_mutex_waiter *act_waiter,
void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *act_waiter,
struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
struct task_struct *task;
if (!debug_locks || detect || !act_waiter)
if (!debug_locks || chwalk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK || !act_waiter)
return;
task = rt_mutex_owner(act_waiter->lock);
......
......@@ -20,14 +20,15 @@ extern void debug_rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct task_struct *powner);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(int detect, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
extern void debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
# define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) \
do { (w)->deadlock_lock = NULL; } while (0)
static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
int detect)
static inline bool debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk walk)
{
return (waiter != NULL);
}
......
......@@ -307,6 +307,32 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
}
/*
* Deadlock detection is conditional:
*
* If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
* if the detect argument is == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK.
*
* If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always
* conducted independent of the detect argument.
*
* If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and
* deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument
* and the config settings.
*/
static bool rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
{
/*
* This is just a wrapper function for the following call,
* because debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock() smells like a magic
* debug feature and I wanted to keep the cond function in the
* main source file along with the comments instead of having
* two of the same in the headers.
*/
return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk);
}
/*
* Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
*/
......@@ -381,7 +407,7 @@ static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
* goto again;
*/
static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
int deadlock_detect,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
struct rt_mutex *orig_lock,
struct rt_mutex *next_lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
......@@ -389,12 +415,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter;
int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
int ret = 0, depth = 0;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
bool detect_deadlock;
unsigned long flags;
detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
deadlock_detect);
detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter, chwalk);
/*
* The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of
......@@ -520,7 +546,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* walk, we detected a deadlock.
*/
if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(chwalk, orig_waiter, lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
ret = -EDEADLK;
goto out_unlock_pi;
......@@ -784,7 +810,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task,
int detect_deadlock)
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
{
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
......@@ -830,7 +856,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
chain_walk = 1;
} else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) {
} else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) {
chain_walk = 1;
}
......@@ -855,7 +881,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock,
res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, chwalk, lock,
next_lock, waiter, task);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
......@@ -960,7 +986,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, next_lock, NULL, current);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock,
next_lock, NULL, current);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
......@@ -990,7 +1017,8 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
get_task_struct(task);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, next_lock, NULL, task);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
next_lock, NULL, task);
}
/**
......@@ -1068,7 +1096,7 @@ static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
static int __sched
rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
int detect_deadlock)
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
int ret = 0;
......@@ -1094,7 +1122,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
timeout->task = NULL;
}
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, detect_deadlock);
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk);
if (likely(!ret))
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
......@@ -1103,7 +1131,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
if (unlikely(ret)) {
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, detect_deadlock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
}
/*
......@@ -1230,27 +1258,29 @@ static inline int
rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
int detect_deadlock))
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
{
if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
return 0;
} else
return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, 0);
return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
}
static inline int
rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, int detect_deadlock,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
int detect_deadlock))
enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
{
if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK &&
likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
return 0;
} else
return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, detect_deadlock);
return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk);
}
static inline int
......@@ -1312,7 +1342,8 @@ int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
{
might_sleep();
return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, 1,
return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
......@@ -1334,7 +1365,8 @@ rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
{
might_sleep();
return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout, 0,
return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
rt_mutex_slowlock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock);
......@@ -1463,7 +1495,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
}
/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1);
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
......
......@@ -22,10 +22,15 @@
#define debug_rt_mutex_init(m, n) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(d, a ,l) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d) (d)
#define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
{
WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n");
}
static inline bool debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w,
enum rtmutex_chainwalk walk)
{
return walk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK;
}
......@@ -101,6 +101,21 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL);
}
/*
* Constants for rt mutex functions which have a selectable deadlock
* detection.
*
* RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK: Stops the lock chain walk when there are
* no further PI adjustments to be made.
*
* RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK: Invoke deadlock detection with a full
* walk of the lock chain.
*/
enum rtmutex_chainwalk {
RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
};
/*
* PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment