tracing: Fix stack tracer with fentry use
commit d4ecbfc4 upstream. When gcc 4.6 on x86 is used, the function tracer will use the new option -mfentry which does a call to "fentry" at every function instead of "mcount". The significance of this is that fentry is called as the first operation of the function instead of the mcount usage of being called after the stack. This causes the stack tracer to show some bogus results for the size of the last function traced, as well as showing "ftrace_call" instead of the function. This is due to the stack frame not being set up by the function that is about to be traced. # cat stack_trace Depth Size Location (48 entries) ----- ---- -------- 0) 4824 216 ftrace_call+0x5/0x2f 1) 4608 112 ____cache_alloc+0xb7/0x22d 2) 4496 80 kmem_cache_alloc+0x63/0x12f The 216 size for ftrace_call includes both the ftrace_call stack (which includes the saving of registers it does), as well as the stack size of the parent. To fix this, if CC_USING_FENTRY is defined, then the stack_tracer will reserve the first item in stack_dump_trace[] array when calling save_stack_trace(), and it will fill it in with the parent ip. Then the code will look for the parent pointer on the stack and give the real size of the parent's stack pointer: # cat stack_trace Depth Size Location (14 entries) ----- ---- -------- 0) 2640 48 update_group_power+0x26/0x187 1) 2592 224 update_sd_lb_stats+0x2a5/0x4ac 2) 2368 160 find_busiest_group+0x31/0x1f1 3) 2208 256 load_balance+0xd9/0x662 I'm Cc'ing stable, although it's not urgent, as it only shows bogus size for item #0, the rest of the trace is legit. It should still be corrected in previous stable releases. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment