mac80211: use synchronize_rcu() with rcu_barrier()

The RCU docs used to state that rcu_barrier() included a wait
for an RCU grace period; however the comments for rcu_barrier()
as of commit f0a0e6f2... "rcu: Clarify memory-ordering properties
of grace-period primitives" contradict this.

So add back synchronize_{rcu,net}() to where they once were,
but keep the rcu_barrier()s for the call_rcu() callbacks.

Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <bob@cozybit.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

net/mac80211/cfg.c

@@ -1043,6 +1043,7 @@ static int ieee80211_stop_ap(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *dev)
 	list_for_each_entry(vlan, &sdata->u.ap.vlans, u.vlan.list)
 		sta_info_flush_defer(vlan);
 	sta_info_flush_defer(sdata);
+	synchronize_net();
 	rcu_barrier();
 	list_for_each_entry(vlan, &sdata->u.ap.vlans, u.vlan.list) {
 		sta_info_flush_cleanup(vlan);

net/mac80211/iface.c

@@ -839,11 +839,12 @@ static void ieee80211_do_stop(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
 		 *
 		 * sta_info_flush_cleanup() requires rcu_barrier()
 		 * first to wait for the station call_rcu() calls
-		 * to complete, here we need at least sychronize_rcu()
-		 * it to wait for the RX path in case it is using the
+		 * to complete, and we also need synchronize_rcu()
+		 * to wait for the RX path in case it is using the
 		 * interface and enqueuing frames at this very time on
 		 * another CPU.
 		 */
+		synchronize_rcu();
 		rcu_barrier();
 		sta_info_flush_cleanup(sdata);
 

net/mac80211/pm.c

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct cfg80211_wowlan *wowlan)
 					IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_SUSPEND);
 
 	/* flush out all packets and station cleanup call_rcu()s */
+	synchronize_net();
 	rcu_barrier();
 
 	ieee80211_flush_queues(local, NULL);