Commit 8e8d5123 authored by Christoph Hellwig's avatar Christoph Hellwig Committed by David S. Miller

[SUNRPC]: Use completions instead of sleep_on for rpciod.

The rpciod shutdown code gives ugly sleep_on without BKL warnings in
-mm.  And it looks indeed somewhat racy.

The easy fix would be to simply use a completion as in the patch below,
but that removes all the signal fuzzing semantics the current code has.
I don't really understand why we want to cancel the operation by
signals, but I think it'd be better to leave that to people familar with
the code anyway..
parent c1cea42a
...@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(all_tasks); ...@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(all_tasks);
* rpciod-related stuff * rpciod-related stuff
*/ */
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rpciod_idle); static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rpciod_idle);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rpciod_killer); static DECLARE_COMPLETION(rpciod_killer);
static DECLARE_MUTEX(rpciod_sema); static DECLARE_MUTEX(rpciod_sema);
static unsigned int rpciod_users; static unsigned int rpciod_users;
static pid_t rpciod_pid; static pid_t rpciod_pid;
...@@ -950,7 +950,6 @@ rpciod_task_pending(void) ...@@ -950,7 +950,6 @@ rpciod_task_pending(void)
static int static int
rpciod(void *ptr) rpciod(void *ptr)
{ {
wait_queue_head_t *assassin = (wait_queue_head_t*) ptr;
int rounds = 0; int rounds = 0;
lock_kernel(); lock_kernel();
...@@ -992,11 +991,11 @@ rpciod(void *ptr) ...@@ -992,11 +991,11 @@ rpciod(void *ptr)
rpciod_killall(); rpciod_killall();
} }
rpciod_pid = 0;
wake_up(assassin);
dprintk("RPC: rpciod exiting\n"); dprintk("RPC: rpciod exiting\n");
unlock_kernel(); unlock_kernel();
rpciod_pid = 0;
complete_and_exit(&rpciod_killer, 0);
return 0; return 0;
} }
...@@ -1041,7 +1040,7 @@ rpciod_up(void) ...@@ -1041,7 +1040,7 @@ rpciod_up(void)
/* /*
* Create the rpciod thread and wait for it to start. * Create the rpciod thread and wait for it to start.
*/ */
error = kernel_thread(rpciod, &rpciod_killer, 0); error = kernel_thread(rpciod, NULL, 0);
if (error < 0) { if (error < 0) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "rpciod_up: create thread failed, error=%d\n", error); printk(KERN_WARNING "rpciod_up: create thread failed, error=%d\n", error);
rpciod_users--; rpciod_users--;
...@@ -1057,8 +1056,6 @@ rpciod_up(void) ...@@ -1057,8 +1056,6 @@ rpciod_up(void)
void void
rpciod_down(void) rpciod_down(void)
{ {
unsigned long flags;
down(&rpciod_sema); down(&rpciod_sema);
dprintk("rpciod_down pid %d sema %d\n", rpciod_pid, rpciod_users); dprintk("rpciod_down pid %d sema %d\n", rpciod_pid, rpciod_users);
if (rpciod_users) { if (rpciod_users) {
...@@ -1073,27 +1070,8 @@ rpciod_down(void) ...@@ -1073,27 +1070,8 @@ rpciod_down(void)
} }
kill_proc(rpciod_pid, SIGKILL, 1); kill_proc(rpciod_pid, SIGKILL, 1);
/* wait_for_completion(&rpciod_killer);
* Usually rpciod will exit very quickly, so we out:
* wait briefly before checking the process id.
*/
clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
yield();
/*
* Display a message if we're going to wait longer.
*/
while (rpciod_pid) {
dprintk("rpciod_down: waiting for pid %d to exit\n", rpciod_pid);
if (signalled()) {
dprintk("rpciod_down: caught signal\n");
break;
}
interruptible_sleep_on(&rpciod_killer);
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&current->sighand->siglock, flags);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->sighand->siglock, flags);
out:
up(&rpciod_sema); up(&rpciod_sema);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment