Commit 9033783c authored by Josh Triplett's avatar Josh Triplett Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: fix return-value types in several function comments

The documentation comments for ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait and
ext4_read_inode_bitmap describe them as returning NULL on error, but
they return an ERR_PTR on error; update the documentation to match.

The documentation comment for ext4_wait_block_bitmap describes it as
returning 1 on error, but it returns -errno on error; update the
documentation to match.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRitesh Harani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/60a3f4996f4932c45515aaa6b75ca42f2a78ec9b.1585512514.git.josh@joshtriplett.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent d87f6392
......@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
* Read the bitmap for a given block_group,and validate the
* bits for block/inode/inode tables are set in the bitmaps
*
* Return buffer_head on success or NULL in case of failure.
* Return buffer_head on success or an ERR_PTR in case of failure.
*/
struct buffer_head *
ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
......@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
/* Returns 0 on success, 1 on error */
/* Returns 0 on success, -errno on error */
int ext4_wait_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
struct buffer_head *bh)
{
......
......@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int ext4_validate_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
* Read the inode allocation bitmap for a given block_group, reading
* into the specified slot in the superblock's bitmap cache.
*
* Return buffer_head of bitmap on success or NULL.
* Return buffer_head of bitmap on success, or an ERR_PTR on error.
*/
static struct buffer_head *
ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment