Commit 90a88643 authored by Paulo Zanoni's avatar Paulo Zanoni Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: set FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES workaround

Commit 1544d9d5 added a workaround
inside haswell_init_clock_gating and mentioned it is "a workaround for
early silicon revisions and should be removed later". This workaround
is documented in bit 31 of PRI_CTL. I asked Arthur and he mentioned
that setting FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES replaces that workaround for the
newer machines. So use the new one.

Also notice that there's still another workaround for PRI_CTL that
involves WM_DBG, but it's not the one we're reverting. And notice that
we were previously setting WM_DBG_DISALLOW_MULTIPIPE_LP which disables
the LP watermarks when more than one pipe is used, and we really don't
want this because we need the LP watermarks if we want to reach deeper
PC states.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Add a comment for the w/a name Ville dug out of Bspec.]
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 3e1f7266
......@@ -3711,6 +3711,9 @@
# define CHICKEN3_DGMG_REQ_OUT_FIX_DISABLE (1 << 5)
# define CHICKEN3_DGMG_DONE_FIX_DISABLE (1 << 2)
#define CHICKEN_PAR1_1 0x42080
#define FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES (1 << 14)
#define DISP_ARB_CTL 0x45000
#define DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING (1<<13)
#define DISP_FBC_WM_DIS (1<<15)
......
......@@ -4172,14 +4172,9 @@ static void haswell_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
/* WaSwitchSolVfFArbitrationPriority:hsw */
I915_WRITE(GAM_ECOCHK, I915_READ(GAM_ECOCHK) | HSW_ECOCHK_ARB_PRIO_SOL);
/* XXX: This is a workaround for early silicon revisions and should be
* removed later.
*/
I915_WRITE(WM_DBG,
I915_READ(WM_DBG) |
WM_DBG_DISALLOW_MULTIPLE_LP |
WM_DBG_DISALLOW_SPRITE |
WM_DBG_DISALLOW_MAXFIFO);
/* WaRsPkgCStateDisplayPMReq:hsw */
I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_PAR1_1,
I915_READ(CHICKEN_PAR1_1) | FORCE_ARB_IDLE_PLANES);
lpt_init_clock_gating(dev);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment