Commit 92eb5f0c authored by Dave Airlie's avatar Dave Airlie

Merge tag 'drm-amdkfd-next-fixes-2018-01-15' of...

Merge tag 'drm-amdkfd-next-fixes-2018-01-15' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux into drm-next

- fix NULL pointer dereference
- fix compiler warning on large define values
- remove unnecessary call to execute_queues_cpsch

* tag 'drm-amdkfd-next-fixes-2018-01-15' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux:
  drm/amdkfd: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences
  drm/amdkfd: add ull suffix to 64bit defines
  drm/amdkfd: don't always call execute_queues_cpsch()
  drm/amdkfd: Fix return value 0 when execute_queues_cpsch fails
parents 4a6cc7a4 2e3dca53
......@@ -1013,13 +1013,13 @@ static int destroy_queue_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm,
list_del(&q->list);
qpd->queue_count--;
if (q->properties.is_active)
if (q->properties.is_active) {
dqm->queue_count--;
retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm,
retval = execute_queues_cpsch(dqm,
KFD_UNMAP_QUEUES_FILTER_DYNAMIC_QUEUES, 0);
if (retval == -ETIME)
qpd->reset_wavefronts = true;
if (retval == -ETIME)
qpd->reset_wavefronts = true;
}
mqd->uninit_mqd(mqd, q->mqd, q->mqd_mem_obj);
......@@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static int destroy_queue_cpsch(struct device_queue_manager *dqm,
mutex_unlock(&dqm->lock);
return 0;
return retval;
failed:
failed_try_destroy_debugged_queue:
......
......@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@
#define KFD_SYSFS_FILE_MODE 0444
#define KFD_MMAP_DOORBELL_MASK 0x8000000000000
#define KFD_MMAP_EVENTS_MASK 0x4000000000000
#define KFD_MMAP_RESERVED_MEM_MASK 0x2000000000000
#define KFD_MMAP_DOORBELL_MASK 0x8000000000000ull
#define KFD_MMAP_EVENTS_MASK 0x4000000000000ull
#define KFD_MMAP_RESERVED_MEM_MASK 0x2000000000000ull
/*
* When working with cp scheduler we should assign the HIQ manually or via
......
......@@ -461,7 +461,8 @@ int kfd_bind_processes_to_device(struct kfd_dev *dev)
hash_for_each_rcu(kfd_processes_table, temp, p, kfd_processes) {
mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
if (pdd->bound != PDD_BOUND_SUSPENDED) {
if (WARN_ON(!pdd) || pdd->bound != PDD_BOUND_SUSPENDED) {
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
continue;
}
......@@ -501,6 +502,11 @@ void kfd_unbind_processes_from_device(struct kfd_dev *dev)
mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
if (WARN_ON(!pdd)) {
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
continue;
}
if (pdd->bound == PDD_BOUND)
pdd->bound = PDD_BOUND_SUSPENDED;
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment