Commit 93b07e7b authored by Axel Lin's avatar Axel Lin Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: tps6507x: Avoid duplicating the same mapping table for LDO2 and VDCDCx

The voltage mapping table for LDO2 is exactly the same as VDCDCx.
Thus we can use one mapping table for both LDO2 and VDCDCx instead of
duplicating the mapping table.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
parent f03c4a57
......@@ -70,24 +70,8 @@ static const unsigned int LDO1_VSEL_table[] = {
2800000, 3000000, 3100000, 3300000,
};
static const unsigned int LDO2_VSEL_table[] = {
725000, 750000, 775000, 800000,
825000, 850000, 875000, 900000,
925000, 950000, 975000, 1000000,
1025000, 1050000, 1075000, 1100000,
1125000, 1150000, 1175000, 1200000,
1225000, 1250000, 1275000, 1300000,
1325000, 1350000, 1375000, 1400000,
1425000, 1450000, 1475000, 1500000,
1550000, 1600000, 1650000, 1700000,
1750000, 1800000, 1850000, 1900000,
1950000, 2000000, 2050000, 2100000,
2150000, 2200000, 2250000, 2300000,
2350000, 2400000, 2450000, 2500000,
2550000, 2600000, 2650000, 2700000,
2750000, 2800000, 2850000, 2900000,
3000000, 3100000, 3200000, 3300000,
};
/* The voltage mapping table for LDO2 is the same as VDCDCx */
#define LDO2_VSEL_table VDCDCx_VSEL_table
struct tps_info {
const char *name;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment