Commit 97806dfb authored by Vasily Gorbik's avatar Vasily Gorbik

s390/unwind: make reuse_sp default when unwinding pt_regs

Currently unwinder yields 2 entries when pt_regs are met:
sp="address of pt_regs itself" ip=pt_regs->psw
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip="r14 from stack frame pointed by pt_regs->gprs[15]"

And neither of those 2 states (combination of sp and ip) ever happened.

reuse_sp has been introduced by commit a1d863ac ("s390/unwind: fix
mixing regs and sp"). reuse_sp=true makes unwinder keen to produce the
following result, when pt_regs are given (as an arg to unwind_start):
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip=pt_regs->psw
sp=pt_regs->gprs[15] ip="r14 from stack frame pointed by pt_regs->gprs[15]"

The first state is an actual state in which a task was when pt_regs were
collected. The second state is marked unreliable and is for debugging
purposes to cover the case when a task has been interrupted in between
stack frame allocation and writing back_chain - in this case r14 might
show an actual caller.

Make unwinder behaviour enabled via reuse_sp=true default and drop the
special case handling.
Reviewed-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
parent 67f55934
......@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct unwind_state {
struct task_struct *task;
struct pt_regs *regs;
unsigned long sp, ip;
bool reuse_sp;
int graph_idx;
bool reliable;
bool error;
......
......@@ -46,16 +46,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
regs = state->regs;
if (unlikely(regs)) {
if (state->reuse_sp) {
sp = state->sp;
state->reuse_sp = false;
} else {
sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->gprs[15]);
if (unlikely(outside_of_stack(state, sp))) {
if (!update_stack_info(state, sp))
goto out_err;
}
}
sp = state->sp;
sf = (struct stack_frame *) sp;
ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(sf->gprs[8]);
reliable = false;
......@@ -81,6 +72,11 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
if (READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->psw.mask) & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
goto out_stop;
ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->psw.addr);
sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->gprs[15]);
if (unlikely(outside_of_stack(state, sp))) {
if (!update_stack_info(state, sp))
goto out_err;
}
reliable = true;
}
}
......@@ -107,7 +103,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
{
struct stack_info *info = &state->stack_info;
unsigned long *mask = &state->stack_mask;
bool reliable, reuse_sp;
bool reliable;
struct stack_frame *sf;
unsigned long ip;
......@@ -134,12 +130,10 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
if (regs) {
ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->psw.addr);
reliable = true;
reuse_sp = true;
} else {
sf = (struct stack_frame *) sp;
ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(sf->gprs[8]);
reliable = false;
reuse_sp = false;
}
ip = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(state->task, &state->graph_idx, ip, NULL);
......@@ -148,6 +142,5 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
state->sp = sp;
state->ip = ip;
state->reliable = reliable;
state->reuse_sp = reuse_sp;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__unwind_start);
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment