Commit 9a6b06c8 authored by Petr Mladek's avatar Petr Mladek Committed by Linus Torvalds

kthread: allow to modify delayed kthread work

There are situations when we need to modify the delay of a delayed kthread
work. For example, when the work depends on an event and the initial delay
means a timeout. Then we want to queue the work immediately when the event
happens.

This patch implements kthread_mod_delayed_work() as inspired workqueues.
It cancels the timer, removes the work from any worker list and queues it
again with the given timeout.

A very special case is when the work is being canceled at the same time.
It might happen because of the regular kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync()
or by another kthread_mod_delayed_work(). In this case, we do nothing and
let the other operation win. This should not normally happen as the caller
is supposed to synchronize these operations a reasonable way.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470754545-17632-11-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.comSigned-off-by: default avatarPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 37be45d4
......@@ -168,6 +168,10 @@ bool kthread_queue_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
struct kthread_delayed_work *dwork,
unsigned long delay);
bool kthread_mod_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
struct kthread_delayed_work *dwork,
unsigned long delay);
void kthread_flush_work(struct kthread_work *work);
void kthread_flush_worker(struct kthread_worker *worker);
......
......@@ -976,6 +976,59 @@ static bool __kthread_cancel_work(struct kthread_work *work, bool is_dwork,
return false;
}
/**
* kthread_mod_delayed_work - modify delay of or queue a kthread delayed work
* @worker: kthread worker to use
* @dwork: kthread delayed work to queue
* @delay: number of jiffies to wait before queuing
*
* If @dwork is idle, equivalent to kthread_queue_delayed_work(). Otherwise,
* modify @dwork's timer so that it expires after @delay. If @delay is zero,
* @work is guaranteed to be queued immediately.
*
* Return: %true if @dwork was pending and its timer was modified,
* %false otherwise.
*
* A special case is when the work is being canceled in parallel.
* It might be caused either by the real kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync()
* or yet another kthread_mod_delayed_work() call. We let the other command
* win and return %false here. The caller is supposed to synchronize these
* operations a reasonable way.
*
* This function is safe to call from any context including IRQ handler.
* See __kthread_cancel_work() and kthread_delayed_work_timer_fn()
* for details.
*/
bool kthread_mod_delayed_work(struct kthread_worker *worker,
struct kthread_delayed_work *dwork,
unsigned long delay)
{
struct kthread_work *work = &dwork->work;
unsigned long flags;
int ret = false;
spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->lock, flags);
/* Do not bother with canceling when never queued. */
if (!work->worker)
goto fast_queue;
/* Work must not be used with >1 worker, see kthread_queue_work() */
WARN_ON_ONCE(work->worker != worker);
/* Do not fight with another command that is canceling this work. */
if (work->canceling)
goto out;
ret = __kthread_cancel_work(work, true, &flags);
fast_queue:
__kthread_queue_delayed_work(worker, dwork, delay);
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&worker->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_mod_delayed_work);
static bool __kthread_cancel_work_sync(struct kthread_work *work, bool is_dwork)
{
struct kthread_worker *worker = work->worker;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment