drm/i915: only one interrupt per batchbuffer is not enough!
Previously I thought that one interrupt per batchbuffer should be enough. Now tedious benchmarking showed this to be wrong. Therefore track whether any commands have been isssued with a future seqno (like pipelined fencing changes or flushes). If this is the case emit a request before issueing the batchbuffer. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment