Commit a731ebe6 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/fair: Fix wake_affine_llc() balancing rules

Chris Wilson reported that the SMT balance rules got the +1 on the
wrong side, resulting in a bias towards the current LLC; which the
load-balancer would then try and undo.
Reported-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 90001d67 ("sched/fair: Fix wake_affine() for !NUMA_BALANCING")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170906105131.gqjmaextmn3u6tj2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 24e700e2
......@@ -5435,7 +5435,7 @@ wake_affine_llc(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
return false;
/* if this cache has capacity, come here */
if (this_stats.has_capacity && this_stats.nr_running < prev_stats.nr_running+1)
if (this_stats.has_capacity && this_stats.nr_running+1 < prev_stats.nr_running)
return true;
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment