Commit ae8547b0 authored by Hans Reiser's avatar Hans Reiser Committed by Artem Bityutskiy

VFS: move inode_lock into sync_sb_inodes

This patch makes 'sync_sb_inodes()' lock 'inode_lock', rather
than expect that the caller will do this.

This change was previously done by Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
and sat in the -mm tree.
Signed-off-by: default avatarArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
parent bce7f793
...@@ -424,8 +424,6 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc) ...@@ -424,8 +424,6 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
* WB_SYNC_HOLD is a hack for sys_sync(): reattach the inode to sb->s_dirty so * WB_SYNC_HOLD is a hack for sys_sync(): reattach the inode to sb->s_dirty so
* that it can be located for waiting on in __writeback_single_inode(). * that it can be located for waiting on in __writeback_single_inode().
* *
* Called under inode_lock.
*
* If `bdi' is non-zero then we're being asked to writeback a specific queue. * If `bdi' is non-zero then we're being asked to writeback a specific queue.
* This function assumes that the blockdev superblock's inodes are backed by * This function assumes that the blockdev superblock's inodes are backed by
* a variety of queues, so all inodes are searched. For other superblocks, * a variety of queues, so all inodes are searched. For other superblocks,
...@@ -446,6 +444,7 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc) ...@@ -446,6 +444,7 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{ {
const unsigned long start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */ const unsigned long start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&sb->s_io)) if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&sb->s_io))
queue_io(sb, wbc->older_than_this); queue_io(sb, wbc->older_than_this);
...@@ -524,6 +523,7 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc) ...@@ -524,6 +523,7 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io)) if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
wbc->more_io = 1; wbc->more_io = 1;
} }
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */ return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */
} }
...@@ -565,11 +565,8 @@ writeback_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc) ...@@ -565,11 +565,8 @@ writeback_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc)
* be unmounted by the time it is released. * be unmounted by the time it is released.
*/ */
if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) { if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
if (sb->s_root) { if (sb->s_root)
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
sync_sb_inodes(sb, wbc); sync_sb_inodes(sb, wbc);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
}
up_read(&sb->s_umount); up_read(&sb->s_umount);
} }
spin_lock(&sb_lock); spin_lock(&sb_lock);
...@@ -607,9 +604,7 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb, int wait) ...@@ -607,9 +604,7 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
(inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused) + (inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused) +
nr_dirty + nr_unstable; nr_dirty + nr_unstable;
wbc.nr_to_write += wbc.nr_to_write / 2; /* Bit more for luck */ wbc.nr_to_write += wbc.nr_to_write / 2; /* Bit more for luck */
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
sync_sb_inodes(sb, &wbc); sync_sb_inodes(sb, &wbc);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
} }
/* /*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment