Commit ba5378b6 authored by Jeff Layton's avatar Jeff Layton Committed by J. Bruce Fields

nfsd: fix setting of NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED in nfsd4_open

In the NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS case, we should only mark it confirmed
if the nfs4_check_open_reclaim check succeeds.

In the NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH and NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV
cases, I see no point in declaring the openowner confirmed when the
operation is going to fail anyway, and doing so might allow the client
to game things such that it wouldn't need to confirm a subsequent open
with the same owner.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent 931ee56c
......@@ -430,12 +430,12 @@ nfsd4_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
goto out;
break;
case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS:
open->op_openowner->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
status = nfs4_check_open_reclaim(&open->op_clientid,
cstate->minorversion,
nn);
if (status)
goto out;
open->op_openowner->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_FH:
case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH:
status = do_open_fhandle(rqstp, cstate, open);
......@@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ nfsd4_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
break;
case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH:
case NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV:
open->op_openowner->oo_flags |= NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED;
dprintk("NFSD: unsupported OPEN claim type %d\n",
open->op_claim_type);
status = nfserr_notsupp;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment