Commit bb08f76d authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

rcu: Remove list_for_each_continue_rcu()

The list_for_each_continue_rcu() macro is no longer used, so this commit
removes it.  The list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() macro should be
used instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent 878d7439
......@@ -271,15 +271,14 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
The same cautions apply to call_rcu_bh() and call_rcu_sched().
9. All RCU list-traversal primitives, which include
rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(),
list_for_each_continue_rcu(), and list_for_each_safe_rcu(),
must be either within an RCU read-side critical section or
must be protected by appropriate update-side locks. RCU
read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock()
and rcu_read_unlock(), or by similar primitives such as
rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), in which case
the matching rcu_dereference() primitive must be used in order
to keep lockdep happy, in this case, rcu_dereference_bh().
rcu_dereference(), list_for_each_entry_rcu(), and
list_for_each_safe_rcu(), must be either within an RCU read-side
critical section or must be protected by appropriate update-side
locks. RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by
rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), or by similar primitives
such as rcu_read_lock_bh() and rcu_read_unlock_bh(), in which
case the matching rcu_dereference() primitive must be used in
order to keep lockdep happy, in this case, rcu_dereference_bh().
The reason that it is permissible to use RCU list-traversal
primitives when the update-side lock is held is that doing so
......
......@@ -789,9 +789,7 @@ RCU list traversal:
list_for_each_entry_rcu
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu
hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu
list_for_each_continue_rcu (to be deprecated in favor of new
list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu)
list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu
RCU pointer/list update:
......
......@@ -286,23 +286,6 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
&pos->member != (head); \
pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
/**
* list_for_each_continue_rcu
* @pos: the &struct list_head to use as a loop cursor.
* @head: the head for your list.
*
* Iterate over an rcu-protected list, continuing after current point.
*
* This list-traversal primitive may safely run concurrently with
* the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu()
* as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
*/
#define list_for_each_continue_rcu(pos, head) \
for ((pos) = rcu_dereference_raw(list_next_rcu(pos)); \
(pos) != (head); \
(pos) = rcu_dereference_raw(list_next_rcu(pos)))
/**
* list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu - continue iteration over list of given type
* @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment