Commit be48ea74 authored by Paul Walmsley's avatar Paul Walmsley Committed by Russell King

[ARM] OMAP3 powerdomains: remove RET from SGX power states list

The SGX device on OMAP3 does not support retention, so remove RET from the
list of possible SGX power states.  Problem debugged by Richard Woodruff
<r-woodruff2@ti.com>.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
parent 46e0ccf8
......@@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ static struct powerdomain dss_pwrdm = {
},
};
/*
* Although the 34XX TRM Rev K Table 4-371 notes that retention is a
* possible SGX powerstate, the SGX device itself does not support
* retention.
*/
static struct powerdomain sgx_pwrdm = {
.name = "sgx_pwrdm",
.prcm_offs = OMAP3430ES2_SGX_MOD,
......@@ -243,7 +248,7 @@ static struct powerdomain sgx_pwrdm = {
.wkdep_srcs = gfx_sgx_wkdeps,
.sleepdep_srcs = cam_gfx_sleepdeps,
/* XXX This is accurate for 3430 SGX, but what about GFX? */
.pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_RET_ON,
.pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
.pwrsts_logic_ret = PWRDM_POWER_RET,
.banks = 1,
.pwrsts_mem_ret = {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment