[PATCH] USB usbfs: missing lock in proc_getdriver
Hi Oliver, > I expect it to rarely matter, but it might matter now and then. It's > just a question of hygiene. If you are using a temporary buffer I'd > like to see it used to full advantage. So either drop the lock or do > a direct copy. I'd prefer the first option your patch implemented. I agree. Greg, please consider applying the updated patch: Protect against driver binding changes while reading the driver name.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment