Commit c0ac76d9 authored by Fan Yong's avatar Fan Yong Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

staging/lustre/scrub: OI scrub on OST

Main part of original patch in Lustre tree
(http://review.whamcloud.com/6669) changes server code and
is unneeded by client. The patch only picks up common
functions and data structures change.

Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3335
Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/6669Signed-off-by: default avatarFan Yong <fan.yong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Zhuravlev <alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 211b3168
......@@ -321,8 +321,11 @@ static inline int range_compare_loc(const struct lu_seq_range *r1,
* xattr.
*/
enum lma_compat {
LMAC_HSM = 0x00000001,
LMAC_SOM = 0x00000002,
LMAC_HSM = 0x00000001,
LMAC_SOM = 0x00000002,
LMAC_NOT_IN_OI = 0x00000004, /* the object does NOT need OI mapping */
LMAC_FID_ON_OST = 0x00000008, /* For OST-object, its OI mapping is
* under /O/<seq>/d<x>. */
};
/**
......
......@@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ int obd_alloc_fail(const void *ptr, const char *name, const char *type,
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_SCRUB_FATAL 0x192
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_FID_MAPPING 0x193
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_LMA_INCOMPAT 0x194
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_COMPAT_INVALID_ENTRY 0x195
#define OBD_FAIL_OST 0x200
#define OBD_FAIL_OST_CONNECT_NET 0x201
......
......@@ -431,6 +431,10 @@ void lustre_assert_wire_constants(void)
(unsigned)LMAC_HSM);
LASSERTF(LMAC_SOM == 0x00000002UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
(unsigned)LMAC_SOM);
LASSERTF(LMAC_NOT_IN_OI == 0x00000004UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
(unsigned)LMAC_NOT_IN_OI);
LASSERTF(LMAC_FID_ON_OST == 0x00000008UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
(unsigned)LMAC_FID_ON_OST);
LASSERTF(OBJ_CREATE == 1, "found %lld\n",
(long long)OBJ_CREATE);
LASSERTF(OBJ_DESTROY == 2, "found %lld\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment