Commit c5e991ee authored by Stephane Eranian's avatar Stephane Eranian Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf/x86: Add list of register names

This patch adds a way to locate a register identifier (PERF_X86_REG_*)
based on its name, e.g., AX.

This will be used by a subsequent patch to improved flexibility of perf
record.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441039273-16260-3-git-send-email-eranian@google.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent fc36f948
......@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ libperf-y += header.o
libperf-y += tsc.o
libperf-y += pmu.o
libperf-y += kvm-stat.o
libperf-y += perf_regs.o
libperf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
......
#include "../../perf.h"
#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
#define REG(n, b) { .name = #n, .mask = 1ULL << (b) }
#define REG_END { .name = NULL }
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
REG(AX, PERF_REG_X86_AX),
REG(BX, PERF_REG_X86_BX),
REG(CX, PERF_REG_X86_CX),
REG(DX, PERF_REG_X86_DX),
REG(SI, PERF_REG_X86_SI),
REG(DI, PERF_REG_X86_DI),
REG(BP, PERF_REG_X86_BP),
REG(SP, PERF_REG_X86_SP),
REG(IP, PERF_REG_X86_IP),
REG(FLAGS, PERF_REG_X86_FLAGS),
REG(CS, PERF_REG_X86_CS),
REG(SS, PERF_REG_X86_SS),
#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT
REG(R8, PERF_REG_X86_R8),
REG(R9, PERF_REG_X86_R9),
REG(R10, PERF_REG_X86_R10),
REG(R11, PERF_REG_X86_R11),
REG(R12, PERF_REG_X86_R12),
REG(R13, PERF_REG_X86_R13),
REG(R14, PERF_REG_X86_R14),
REG(R15, PERF_REG_X86_R15),
#endif
REG_END
};
......@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@
struct regs_dump;
struct sample_reg {
const char *name;
uint64_t mask;
};
extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
#include <perf_regs.h>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment