Commit cee58483 authored by John Stultz's avatar John Stultz Committed by Linus Torvalds

time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into timespec_valid_strict

Andreas Bombe reported that the added ktime_t overflow checking added to
timespec_valid in commit 4e8b1452 ("time: Improve sanity checking of
timekeeping inputs") was causing problems with X.org because it caused
timeouts larger then KTIME_T to be invalid.

Previously, these large timeouts would be clamped to KTIME_MAX and would
never expire, which is valid.

This patch splits the ktime_t overflow checking into a new
timespec_valid_strict function, and converts the timekeeping codes
internal checking to use this more strict function.
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarAndreas Bombe <aeb@debian.org>
Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 7a611e69
......@@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ static inline bool timespec_valid(const struct timespec *ts)
/* Can't have more nanoseconds then a second */
if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
return false;
return true;
}
static inline bool timespec_valid_strict(const struct timespec *ts)
{
if (!timespec_valid(ts))
return false;
/* Disallow values that could overflow ktime_t */
if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
return false;
......
......@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
struct timespec ts_delta, xt;
unsigned long flags;
if (!timespec_valid(tv))
if (!timespec_valid_strict(tv))
return -EINVAL;
write_seqlock_irqsave(&tk->lock, flags);
......@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
/* Make sure the proposed value is valid */
tmp = timespec_add(tk_xtime(tk), *ts);
if (!timespec_valid(&tmp)) {
if (!timespec_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto error;
}
......@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
struct timespec now, boot, tmp;
read_persistent_clock(&now);
if (!timespec_valid(&now)) {
if (!timespec_valid_strict(&now)) {
pr_warn("WARNING: Persistent clock returned invalid value!\n"
" Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
now.tv_sec = 0;
......@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
}
read_boot_clock(&boot);
if (!timespec_valid(&boot)) {
if (!timespec_valid_strict(&boot)) {
pr_warn("WARNING: Boot clock returned invalid value!\n"
" Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
boot.tv_sec = 0;
......@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static struct timespec timekeeping_suspend_time;
static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timekeeper *tk,
struct timespec *delta)
{
if (!timespec_valid(delta)) {
if (!timespec_valid_strict(delta)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime: Invalid "
"sleep delta value!\n");
return;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment