Commit d244d0e1 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

x86/traps: Document do_spurious_interrupt_bug()

Add a comment which explains why this empty handler for a reserved vector
exists.
Requested-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200225220216.624165786@linutronix.de
parent e039dd81
......@@ -862,6 +862,25 @@ do_simd_coprocessor_error(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
dotraplinkage void
do_spurious_interrupt_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
{
/*
* This addresses a Pentium Pro Erratum:
*
* PROBLEM: If the APIC subsystem is configured in mixed mode with
* Virtual Wire mode implemented through the local APIC, an
* interrupt vector of 0Fh (Intel reserved encoding) may be
* generated by the local APIC (Int 15). This vector may be
* generated upon receipt of a spurious interrupt (an interrupt
* which is removed before the system receives the INTA sequence)
* instead of the programmed 8259 spurious interrupt vector.
*
* IMPLICATION: The spurious interrupt vector programmed in the
* 8259 is normally handled by an operating system's spurious
* interrupt handler. However, a vector of 0Fh is unknown to some
* operating systems, which would crash if this erratum occurred.
*
* In theory this could be limited to 32bit, but the handler is not
* hurting and who knows which other CPUs suffer from this.
*/
}
dotraplinkage void
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment