Commit e005715e authored by Derek Basehore's avatar Derek Basehore Committed by Linus Torvalds

drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c: don't disable hpet emulation on suspend

There's a bug where rtc alarms are ignored after the rtc cmos suspends
but before the system finishes suspend.  Since hpet emulation is
disabled and it still handles the interrupts, a wake event is never
registered which is done from the rtc layer.

This patch reverts commit d1b2efa8 ("rtc: disable hpet emulation on
suspend") which disabled hpet emulation.  To fix the problem mentioned
in that commit, hpet_rtc_timer_init() is called directly on resume.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDerek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent a5ef73f0
...@@ -804,9 +804,8 @@ static int cmos_suspend(struct device *dev) ...@@ -804,9 +804,8 @@ static int cmos_suspend(struct device *dev)
mask = RTC_IRQMASK; mask = RTC_IRQMASK;
tmp &= ~mask; tmp &= ~mask;
CMOS_WRITE(tmp, RTC_CONTROL); CMOS_WRITE(tmp, RTC_CONTROL);
hpet_mask_rtc_irq_bit(mask);
/* shut down hpet emulation - we don't need it for alarm */
hpet_mask_rtc_irq_bit(RTC_PIE|RTC_AIE|RTC_UIE);
cmos_checkintr(cmos, tmp); cmos_checkintr(cmos, tmp);
} }
spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock); spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
...@@ -870,6 +869,7 @@ static int cmos_resume(struct device *dev) ...@@ -870,6 +869,7 @@ static int cmos_resume(struct device *dev)
rtc_update_irq(cmos->rtc, 1, mask); rtc_update_irq(cmos->rtc, 1, mask);
tmp &= ~RTC_AIE; tmp &= ~RTC_AIE;
hpet_mask_rtc_irq_bit(RTC_AIE); hpet_mask_rtc_irq_bit(RTC_AIE);
hpet_rtc_timer_init();
} while (mask & RTC_AIE); } while (mask & RTC_AIE);
spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock); spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment