Commit e260999c authored by Axel Lin's avatar Axel Lin Committed by Liam Girdwood

regulator: wm831x-ldo - fix the logic to set REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE and REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY modes

Problem description in current implementation:
When setting REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE mode, current implementation set
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit of ctrl_reg (which is wrong, it should clear the bit).
But due to a missing break statement for case REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE, the code
fall through to case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY and then clear
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit. So it still looks OK when checking the status
by wm831x_gp_ldo_get_mode().

When setting REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY mode, it just does not work.
wm831x_gp_ldo_get_mode() will still return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE because
the accordingly WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit is clear.

Correct behavior should be:
Clear WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit of ctrl_reg for REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE mode.
Set WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit of ctrl_reg for REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY mode.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
parent 49990e6e
......@@ -215,8 +215,7 @@ static int wm831x_gp_ldo_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
case REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE:
ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, ctrl_reg,
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE,
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE);
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
......@@ -225,10 +224,12 @@ static int wm831x_gp_ldo_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
WM831X_LDO1_ON_MODE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
break;
case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY:
ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, ctrl_reg,
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE, 0);
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE,
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment