Commit f232142c authored by J. Bruce Fields's avatar J. Bruce Fields Committed by Trond Myklebust

NLM: Clean up nlmsvc_grant_reply locking

 Slightly simpler logic here makes it more trivial to verify that the up's
 and down's are balanced here.  Break out an assignment from a conditional
 while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
parent fb459f45
......@@ -637,11 +637,12 @@ nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status
file->f_count++;
down(&file->f_sema);
if ((block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie,&rqstp->rq_addr)) != NULL) {
block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie, &rqstp->rq_addr);
if (block) {
if (status == NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD) {
/* Try again in a couple of seconds */
nlmsvc_insert_block(block, 10 * HZ);
block = NULL;
up(&file->f_sema);
} else {
/* Lock is now held by client, or has been rejected.
* In both cases, the block should be removed. */
......@@ -652,8 +653,6 @@ nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status
nlmsvc_delete_block(block, 1);
}
}
if (!block)
up(&file->f_sema);
nlm_release_file(file);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment