Commit f260fe7b authored by Mika Kuoppala's avatar Mika Kuoppala Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Don't accumulate hangcheck score on forward progress

If the actual head has progressed forward inside a batch (request),
don't accumulate hangcheck score.

As the hangcheck score in increased only by acthd jumping backwards,
the result is that we only declare an active batch as stuck if it is
trapped inside a loop. Or that the looping will dominate the batch
progression so that it overcomes the bonus that forward progress gives.

v2: Improved commit message (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
[danvet: s/active_loop/active (loop)/ as requested by Chris.]
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 02c9f7e3
......@@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ static const char *hangcheck_action_to_str(enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action a)
return "wait";
case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE:
return "active";
case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE_LOOP:
return "active (loop)";
case HANGCHECK_KICK:
return "kick";
case HANGCHECK_HUNG:
......
......@@ -3189,8 +3189,14 @@ ring_stuck(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u64 acthd)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
u32 tmp;
if (ring->hangcheck.acthd != acthd)
return HANGCHECK_ACTIVE;
if (acthd != ring->hangcheck.acthd) {
if (acthd > ring->hangcheck.max_acthd) {
ring->hangcheck.max_acthd = acthd;
return HANGCHECK_ACTIVE;
}
return HANGCHECK_ACTIVE_LOOP;
}
if (IS_GEN2(dev))
return HANGCHECK_HUNG;
......@@ -3301,8 +3307,9 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
switch (ring->hangcheck.action) {
case HANGCHECK_IDLE:
case HANGCHECK_WAIT:
break;
case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE:
break;
case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE_LOOP:
ring->hangcheck.score += BUSY;
break;
case HANGCHECK_KICK:
......@@ -3322,6 +3329,8 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
*/
if (ring->hangcheck.score > 0)
ring->hangcheck.score--;
ring->hangcheck.acthd = ring->hangcheck.max_acthd = 0;
}
ring->hangcheck.seqno = seqno;
......
......@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action {
HANGCHECK_IDLE = 0,
HANGCHECK_WAIT,
HANGCHECK_ACTIVE,
HANGCHECK_ACTIVE_LOOP,
HANGCHECK_KICK,
HANGCHECK_HUNG,
};
......@@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action {
struct intel_ring_hangcheck {
u64 acthd;
u64 max_acthd;
u32 seqno;
int score;
enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action action;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment