Commit f60deecb authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva

scsi: lpfc: lpfc_hbadisc: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with a
"fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114976 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114977 ("Missing break in switch")
Reviewed-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
parent bf9598bd
......@@ -4667,9 +4667,11 @@ lpfc_check_sli_ndlp(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
case CMD_GEN_REQUEST64_CR:
if (iocb->context_un.ndlp == ndlp)
return 1;
/* fall through */
case CMD_ELS_REQUEST64_CR:
if (icmd->un.elsreq64.remoteID == ndlp->nlp_DID)
return 1;
/* fall through */
case CMD_XMIT_ELS_RSP64_CX:
if (iocb->context1 == (uint8_t *) ndlp)
return 1;
......@@ -5856,7 +5858,7 @@ lpfc_disc_timeout_handler(struct lpfc_vport *vport)
case LPFC_LINK_UP:
lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport);
/* Drop thru */
/* fall through */
case LPFC_LINK_UNKNOWN:
case LPFC_WARM_START:
case LPFC_INIT_START:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment