Commit f6db44df authored by Yinghai Lu's avatar Yinghai Lu Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86: fix typo in filter_cpuid_features()

Impact: fix wrong disabling of cpu features

an amd system got this strange output:

 CPU: CPU feature monitor disabled due to lack of CPUID level 0x5

but in /proc/cpuinfo I have:

 cpuid level	: 5

on intel system:

 CPU: CPU feature monitor disabled due to lack of CPUID level 0x5
 CPU: CPU feature dca disabled due to lack of CPUID level 0x9

but in /proc/cpuinfo i have:

 cpuid level     : 11

Tt turns out there is a typo, and we should use level member in df.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent b38b0665
......@@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ static void __cpuinit filter_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, bool warn)
* signs here...
*/
if (cpu_has(c, df->feature) &&
((s32)df->feature < 0 ?
(u32)df->feature > (u32)c->extended_cpuid_level :
(s32)df->feature > (s32)c->cpuid_level)) {
((s32)df->level < 0 ?
(u32)df->level > (u32)c->extended_cpuid_level :
(s32)df->level > (s32)c->cpuid_level)) {
clear_cpu_cap(c, df->feature);
if (warn)
printk(KERN_WARNING
......@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void __cpuinit filter_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, bool warn)
df->level);
}
}
}
}
/*
* Naming convention should be: <Name> [(<Codename>)]
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment