There are two literal blocks there. Fix the markups, in order
to produce the right html output and solve those warnings:

	./drivers/base/core.c:4218: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
	./drivers/base/core.c:4222: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
	./drivers/base/core.c:4223: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.

Fixes: a787e540 ("driver core: add device probe log helper")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Fix this warning:

	./block/bio.c:1098: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.

The thing is that *iter is not a valid markup.

That seems to be a typo:
	*iter -> @iter
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There are some warnings there:
	./include/kunit/test.h:90: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'kunit_resource'
	./include/kunit/test.h:353: warning: Function parameter or member 'res' not described in 'kunit_add_resource'
	./include/kunit/test.h:367: warning: Function parameter or member 'res' not described in 'kunit_add_named_resource'
	./include/kunit/test.h:367: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'kunit_add_named_resource'
	./include/kunit/test.h:367: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'kunit_add_named_resource'
	./include/kunit/test.h:367: warning: Excess function parameter 'name_data' description in 'kunit_add_named_resource'

Address them, ensuring that all non-private arguments will
be properly described. With that regards, at struct kunit_resource,
the free argument is described as user-provided. So, this
doesn't seem to belong to the "private" part of the struct.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Using "@bio's parent" causes the following waring:
	./block/bio.c:10: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.

The main problem here is that this would be converted into:

	**bio**'s parent

By kernel-doc, which is not a valid notation. It would be
possible to use, instead, this kernel-doc markup:

	``bio's`` parent

Yet, here, is probably simpler to just use an altenative language:

	the parent of @bio
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

As reported:

	Documentation/powerpc/syscall64-abi.rst:53: WARNING: Malformed table.
	Text in column margin in table line 2.

	=========== ============= ========================================
	--- For the sc instruction, differences with the ELF ABI ---
	r0          Volatile      (System call number.)

This table requires a different notation to be valid.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The hamradio docs were moved to a different dir.
Update its location accordingly.

Fixes: 14474950 ("docs: networking: move z8530 to the hw driver section")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The location of ltpc.rst changed. Update it at Kconfig.

Fixes: 4daedf7a ("docs: networking: move AppleTalk / LocalTalk drivers to the hw driver section")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There were several files converted to yaml, but the .txt file
is still referenced somewhere else.

Update the references for them to point to the right file.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

chanseset b3a7bb1851c8 ("docs: get rid of :c:type explicit declarations for structs")
removed several :c:type: markups, except by one.

Now, Sphinx 3.x complains about it:

	.../Documentation/core-api/boot-time-mm:26: ../mm/memblock.c:51: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'struct\nmemblock_type'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected identifier in nested name, got keyword: struct [error at 6]
	  struct
	memblock_type
	  ------^

As, on Sphinx 3.x, the right markup is c:struct:`foo`.

So, let's remove it, relying on automarkup.py to convert it.
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There are several functions at math64.h that are also
defined at div64.c. As both are included at kernel-api.rst,
Sphinx 3.x complains about symbol duplication:

	./lib/math/div64.c:73: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'div_s64_rem'.
	./lib/math/div64.c:104: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'div64_u64_rem'.
	./lib/math/div64.c:144: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'div64_u64'.
	./lib/math/div64.c:172: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'div64_s64'.

In order to avoid Sphinx warnings about duplication, change the kernel-doc
markups to just comments at math64.h.
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Changeset 129134e5 ("media: media/v4l2: remove V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT flag")
reverted an uAPI flag, but it kept some left-overs at the documentation.

Drop them too. This should solve this warning:

	Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/buffer.rst:692: WARNING: The "flat-table" directive is empty; content required.

	.. flat-table::
	    :header-rows:  0
	    :stub-columns: 0
	    :widths:       3 1 4

Fixes: 129134e5 ("media: media/v4l2: remove V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT flag")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

As warned by Sphinx 2.4.4:
	.../Documentation/translations/zh_CN/arm64/amu.rst:7: WARNING: Title overline too short.

Increase its size.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

This is already documented at device_link.rst, causing this
warning, due to a broken cross-reference:

	.../Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/infrastructure'.
	Declaration is 'device_link_state'.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

After the build fix patches, it is believed that the output
with Sphinx 3.x won't be a problem. Still, the C domain
support was re-written, and this can have caused hidden
issues.

So, let's keep the warning, changing it to a lighter
warning text.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Sphinx C parser for the C domain is now more pedantic when
trying to identify the function types. That prevents scope
macros to be used as type defines.

Yet, since 3.0.2, it is possible to provide it a list of
such macros. Add them, in order to solve several Sphinx 3.x
warnings.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

pci_device_id is already documented at pci.rst:

	./Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'PCI/pci'.
	Declaration is 'pci_device_id'.

The kstrtol and kstrtoul are already at kernel-api:

	./Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'kstrtoul'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'kstrtol'.

And the printk is already defined at printk-basics:

	./Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/printk-basics'.
	Declaration is 'printk'.

So, exclude those identifiers from basirs.rst.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Sphinx 3.x doesn't allow expressions using :c:func markup:

	./Documentation/driver-api/mei/mei.rst:41: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'close(int fd)'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 5]
	  close(int fd)
	  -----^

So, convert it into a :c:expr.
Acked-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There's a missing "`", causing this warning:
	./Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst:404: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'cpu_to_be32p(), che prende un puntatore\nad un tipo, e ritorna il valore convertito. L\'altra variante per\nla famiglia di conversioni "in-situ", come :c:func:`cpu_to_be32s'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 14]
	  cpu_to_be32p(), che prende un puntatore
	ad un tipo, e ritorna il valore convertito. L'altra variante per
	la famiglia di conversioni "in-situ", come :c:func:`cpu_to_be32s
	  --------------^
Acked-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The C domain parser of Sphinx3 expects just function names
for :c:func: markups:

	./Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst:413: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'device_may_wakeup(dev)'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 17]
	  device_may_wakeup(dev)
	  -----------------^
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

As reported by Sphinx:

	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1147: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_oa_wait_unlocked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1169: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_oa_poll_wait'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1189: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_oa_read'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2669: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_oa_stream_enable'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2734: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_oa_stream_disable'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2820: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_oa_stream_init'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3010: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_read'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3098: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_poll_locked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3129: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_poll'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3152: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_enable_locked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3181: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_disable_locked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3273: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_ioctl'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3296: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_destroy_locked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3321: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_release'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3379: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3534: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'read_properties_unlocked'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3717: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_open_ioctl'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3760: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_register'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3789: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_unregister'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4009: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_add_config_ioctl'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4162: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_remove_config_ioctl'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4260: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_init'.
	./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4423: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
	Declaration is 'i915_perf_fini'.

With Sphinx 3, C declarations can't be duplicated anymore,
so let's exclude those from the other internals found on
i915_perf.c file.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Those are already documented at:

	Documentation/driver-api/firmware/request_firmware.rst

Including it twice is causing lots of warnings:

	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'request_firmware'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'firmware_request_nowarn'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'request_firmware_direct'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'firmware_request_platform'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'firmware_request_cache'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'request_firmware_into_buf'.
	./Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/firmware/request_firmware'.
	Declaration is 'request_firmware_nowait'.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The usage of :c:type: to reference to a struct member is wrong,
as pointed by Sphinx 3:

	./Documentation/driver-api/libata.rst:511: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'qc->complete_fn'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 2]
	  qc->complete_fn
	  --^

Instead, let's use :c:expr: for such purpose.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Which Sphinx 3, :c:type:  can't be used anymore for structs,
as this should be used only for typedefs.

Rely on automarkup.py for struct references.

This file has an special case, though: it uses the tag also
to point to an array. Let's use, instead, :c:expr: for such
purpose, as it should do the right thing.

This should fix this warning:

	./Documentation/dev-tools/kgdb.rst:875: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'kdb_poll_funcs[]'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 14]
	  kdb_poll_funcs[]
	  --------------^
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Those macros are not doing the right thing with Sphinx 3,
causing parse errors:

	./Documentation/driver-api/fpga/fpga-mgr.rst:104: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'fpga_manager->state'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 12]
	  fpga_manager->state
	  ------------^
	./Documentation/driver-api/fpga/fpga-programming.rst:18: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'fpga_region->info'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 11]
	  fpga_region->info
	  -----------^
	./Documentation/driver-api/fpga/fpga-region.rst:62: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'fpga_region->bridge_list'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 11]
	  fpga_region->bridge_list
	  -----------^
	./Documentation/driver-api/fpga/fpga-region.rst:62: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'fpga_region->get_bridges'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 11]
	  fpga_region->get_bridges
	  -----------^

Replace them by :c:expr:, with does what's desired.
Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Some such markups are invalid, as reported by Sphinx:

	./Documentation/sound/kernel-api/writing-an-alsa-driver.rst:3317: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'snd_rawmidi_transmit*'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 20]
	  snd_rawmidi_transmit*
	  --------------------^
	./Documentation/sound/kernel-api/writing-an-alsa-driver.rst:3917: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'copy_from/to_user'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 9]
	  copy_from/to_user
	  ---------^

The first case seems to be better replaced by a literal.

For the second one, let's generate cross-references, by
spliting it in two.
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The :c:type macros are not used properly there, as reported
by Sphinx 3:

	./Documentation/block/blk-mq.rst:112: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'hctx->dispatch'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 4]
	  hctx->dispatch
	  ----^

Also, they won't be generating any cross references.

So, replace them by a literal markup.
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

the :c:type shouldn't be used with structs with Sphinx 3,
as the C domain there uses .. c:struct for structs.

As we have the automarkup extension, let's just get rid of
all :c:type as a whole, as those will be automagically
marked as such.

This solves a bunch of warnings with Sphinx 3, like those:

	.../Documentation/sound/kernel-api/writing-an-alsa-driver.rst:490: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'calling snd_card_free'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 8]
	  calling snd_card_free
	  --------^
	.../Documentation/sound/kernel-api/writing-an-alsa-driver.rst:3328: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'snd_rawmidi_transmit*'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 20]
	  snd_rawmidi_transmit*
	  --------------------^
	.../Documentation/sound/kernel-api/writing-an-alsa-driver.rst:3928: WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'copy_from/to_user'
	Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 9]
	  copy_from/to_user
	  ---------^
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There's no need to use macros to use :c:type on this file,
as automarkup.py should do this automatically.

Also, this breaks compatibility with Sphinx 3.x, as there,
structs should be declared using .. c:struct.

So, get rid of them.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The :c:type: tag has problems with Sphinx 3.x, as structs
there should be declared with c:struct.

So, remove them, relying at automarkup.py extension to
convert them into cross-references.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There is currently a problem with kernel-doc tags from blk.c:

	.../Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-blk:239: ./fs/pstore/blk.c:175: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'admin-guide/pstore-blk'.
	Declaration is 'register_pstore_device'.
	.../Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-blk:239: ./fs/pstore/blk.c:432: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'admin-guide/pstore-blk'.
	Declaration is 'register_pstore_blk'.
	.../Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-blk:242: ./include/linux/pstore_blk.h:43: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'admin-guide/pstore-blk'.
	Declaration is 'pstore_device_info'.

Basically, the internal parts is shown with :export:, instead
of :internal:. Yet, there are some other exported docs that
aren't at the document, because they lack :identifiers:.

So, instead, let's just use :export: at the kAPI part of
the documentation.
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Those are already defined at kernel-api.rst, as part of the
synchronization primitives chapter.

This solves several Sphinx 3 warnings, like:

	.../Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'rcu_idle_enter'.
	.../Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'rcu_idle_exit'.
	.../Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'rcu_is_watching'.
	.../Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'call_rcu'.
	.../Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'core-api/kernel-api'.
	Declaration is 'synchronize_rcu'.
	...
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The infrastructure.rst file already includes the external
symbols from drivers/base/core.c.

Duplicating 3 functions there causes namespace collisions:

	Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/infrastructure'.
	Declaration is 'device_link_state'.
	Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/infrastructure'.
	Declaration is 'device_link_add'.
	Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/infrastructure'.
	Declaration is 'device_link_del'.
	Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'driver-api/infrastructure'.
	Declaration is 'device_link_remove'.

So, drop the reference, adding just a mention to the functions
associated with device_link.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

This is already included at scsi.rst. So, remove the duplication,
in order to avoid Sphinx warnings.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

As there's already a rst file with workqueue markups, containing
part of them, move the other definitions, in order to avoid
warnings with Sphinx.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The sound API is documented on two different parts:
under Documentation/driver-api/sound.rst and under
Documentation/sound/kernel-api/alsa-driver-api.rst.

The alsa-driver-api.rst seems more complete, and APIs
are split per type. There's just one missing kernel-doc
markup there.

Add it and drop the duplicated one.
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

This is already included at genericirq.rst. Adding it twice
causes C namespace duplication:

	.../Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:237: ../kernel/irq/manage.c:100: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'genericirq'.
	Declaration is 'synchronize_hardirq'.
	.../Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:237: ../kernel/irq/manage.c:128: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'genericirq'.
	Declaration is 'synchronize_irq'.
	.../Documentation/core-api/kernel-api:237: ../kernel/irq/manage.c:443: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'genericirq'.
	Declaration is 'irq_set_affinity_notifier'.
	...
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Currently, kernel/irq/chip.c is included twice, one for
export functions, and then for internal ones. However, as
the :export:  and :internal: tags are missing, they ended
being included twice.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There are some warnings produced with Sphinx 3.x:

	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:29: WARNING: Error in declarator or parameters
	Invalid C declaration: Expecting "(" in parameters. [error at 7]
	  int sd = socket(PF_IEEE802154, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
	  -------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:134: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 81]
	  void ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 lqi):
	  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:139: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 95]
	  void ieee802154_xmit_complete(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb, bool ifs_handling):
	  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:158: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 35]
	  int start(struct ieee802154_hw *hw):
	  -----------------------------------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:162: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 35]
	  void stop(struct ieee802154_hw *hw):
	  -----------------------------------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:166: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 61]
	  int xmit_async(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb):
	  -------------------------------------------------------------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:171: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 43]
	  int ed(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 *level):
	  -------------------------------------------^
	Documentation/networking/ieee802154.rst:176: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 62]
	  int set_channel(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, u8 page, u8 channel):
	  --------------------------------------------------------------^

Caused by some bad c:function: prototypes. Fix them.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

The C domain functions there collide with the English ones,
due to namespace collision, generating lots of warnings with
Sphinx 3.x:

	./include/linux/mutex.h:121: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking'.
	Declaration is 'mutex_init'.
	./include/linux/mutex.h:152: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking'.
	Declaration is 'mutex_is_locked'.
	./include/linux/mutex.h:226: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking'.
	Declaration is 'mutex_trylock_recursive'.
	./kernel/locking/mutex.c:281: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking'.
	Declaration is 'mutex_lock'.
	...

Add a namespace tag there, in order to prevent that.
Acked-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

There are some c-domain tags that are wrong. While this won't
cause problems with Sphinx < 3.0, this cause troubles with
newer versions, as the C parser won't recognize the contents
of the tag, and will drop it from the output.

Let's just place them at literal blocks.
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>