- 04 Oct, 2013 4 commits
-
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev, can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents. Fix this by zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
The current implementation of worker threads in Btrfs has races in worker stopping code, which cause all kinds of panics and lockups when running btrfs/011 xfstest in a loop. The problem is that btrfs_stop_workers is unsynchronized with respect to check_idle_worker, check_busy_worker and __btrfs_start_workers. E.g., check_idle_worker race flow: btrfs_stop_workers(): check_idle_worker(aworker): - grabs the lock - splices the idle list into the working list - removes the first worker from the working list - releases the lock to wait for its kthread's completion - grabs the lock - if aworker is on the working list, moves aworker from the working list to the idle list - releases the lock - grabs the lock - puts the worker - removes the second worker from the working list ...... btrfs_stop_workers returns, aworker is on the idle list FS is umounted, memory is freed ...... aworker is waken up, fireworks ensue With this applied, I wasn't able to trigger the problem in 48 hours, whereas previously I could reliably reproduce at least one of these races within an hour. Reported-by:David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
The crash[1] is found by xfstests/generic/208 with "-o compress", it's not reproduced everytime, but it does panic. The bug is quite interesting, it's actually introduced by a recent commit (573aecaf, Btrfs: actually limit the size of delalloc range). Btrfs implements delay allocation, so during writeback, we (1) get a page A and lock it (2) search the state tree for delalloc bytes and lock all pages within the range (3) process the delalloc range, including find disk space and create ordered extent and so on. (4) submit the page A. It runs well in normal cases, but if we're in a racy case, eg. buffered compressed writes and aio-dio writes, sometimes we may fail to lock all pages in the 'delalloc' range, in which case, we need to fall back to search the state tree again with a smaller range limit(max_bytes = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset). The mentioned commit has a side effect, that is, in the fallback case, we can find delalloc bytes before the index of the page we already have locked, so we're in the case of (delalloc_end <= *start) and return with (found > 0). This ends with not locking delalloc pages but making ->writepage still process them, and the crash happens. This fixes it by just thinking that we find nothing and returning to caller as the caller knows how to deal with it properly. [1]: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2170! [...] CPU: 2 PID: 11755 Comm: btrfs-delalloc- Tainted: G O 3.11.0+ #8 [...] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810f5093>] [<ffffffff810f5093>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1e/0x83 [...] [ 4934.248731] Stack: [ 4934.248731] ffff8801477e5dc8 ffffea00049b9f00 ffff8801869f9ce8 ffffffffa02b841a [ 4934.248731] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000fff 0000000000000620 [ 4934.248731] ffff88018db59c78 ffffea0005da8d40 ffffffffa02ff860 00000001810016c0 [ 4934.248731] Call Trace: [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffffa02b841a>] extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io+0xcf/0xf5 [btrfs] [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffffa02a8889>] compress_file_range+0x1dc/0x4cb [btrfs] [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffff8104f7af>] ? detach_if_pending+0x22/0x4b [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffffa02a8bad>] async_cow_start+0x35/0x53 [btrfs] [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffffa02c694b>] worker_loop+0x14b/0x48c [btrfs] [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffffa02c6800>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x25c/0x25c [btrfs] [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffff810608f5>] kthread+0x8d/0x95 [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffff81060868>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43 [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffff814fe09c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 4934.248731] [<ffffffff81060868>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43 [ 4934.248731] Code: ff 85 c0 0f 94 c0 0f b6 c0 59 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 89 fb e8 2c de 00 00 49 89 c4 48 8b 03 a8 01 75 02 <0f> 0b 4d 85 e4 74 52 49 8b 84 24 80 00 00 00 f6 40 20 01 75 44 [ 4934.248731] RIP [<ffffffff810f5093>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1e/0x83 [ 4934.248731] RSP <ffff8801869f9c48> [ 4934.280307] ---[ end trace 36f06d3f8750236a ]--- Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If we crash with a log, remount and recover that log, and then crash before we can commit another transaction we will get transid verify errors on the next mount. This is because we were not zero'ing out the log when we committed the transaction after recovery. This is ok as long as we commit another transaction at some point in the future, but if you abort or something else goes wrong you can end up in this weird state because the recovery stuff says that the tree log should have a generation+1 of the super generation, which won't be the case of the transaction that was started for recovery. Fix this by removing the check and _always_ zero out the log portion of the super when we commit a transaction. This fixes the transid verify issues I was seeing with my force errors tests. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Sep, 2013 26 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
Users have been complaining of the uuid tree stuff warning that there is no uuid root when trying to do snapshot operations. This is because if you mount -o ro we will not create the uuid tree. But then if you mount -o rw,remount we will still not create it and then any subsequent snapshot/subvol operations you try to do will fail gloriously. Fix this by creating the uuid_root on remount rw if it was not already there. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Mark Fasheh authored
btrfs_ioctl_file_extent_same() uses __put_user_unaligned() to copy some data back to it's argument struct. Unfortunately, not all architectures provide __put_user_unaligned(), so compiles break on them if btrfs is selected. Instead, just copy the whole struct in / out at the start and end of operations, respectively. Signed-off-by:
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Guangyu Sun authored
Commit 2bc55652 (Btrfs: don't update atime on RO subvolumes) ensures that the access time of an inode is not updated when the inode lives in a read-only subvolume. However, if a directory on a read-only subvolume is accessed, the atime is updated. This results in a write operation to a read-only subvolume. I believe that access times should never be updated on read-only subvolumes. To reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/dm-3 (...) # mount /dev/dm-3 /mnt # btrfs subvol create /mnt/sub Create subvolume '/mnt/sub' # mkdir /mnt/sub/dir # echo "abc" > /mnt/sub/dir/file # btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/sub /mnt/rosnap Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sub' in '/mnt/rosnap' # stat /mnt/rosnap/dir File: `/mnt/rosnap/dir' Size: 8 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 16h/22d Inode: 257 Links: 1 Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: 2013-09-11 07:21:49.389157126 -0400 Modify: 2013-09-11 07:22:02.330156079 -0400 Change: 2013-09-11 07:22:02.330156079 -0400 # ls /mnt/rosnap/dir file # stat /mnt/rosnap/dir File: `/mnt/rosnap/dir' Size: 8 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 16h/22d Inode: 257 Links: 1 Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: 2013-09-11 07:22:56.797151670 -0400 Modify: 2013-09-11 07:22:02.330156079 -0400 Change: 2013-09-11 07:22:02.330156079 -0400 Reported-by:
Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Guangyu Sun <guangyu.sun@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Frank Holton authored
The kernel log entries for device label %s and device fsid %pU are missing the btrfs: prefix. Add those here. Signed-off-by:
Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
It's still possible to flip the filesystem into RW mode after it's remounted RO due to an abort. There are lots of places that check for the superblock error bit and will not write data, but we should not let the filesystem appear read-write. Signed-off-by:
-
chandan authored
This patch makes it possible to set BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID as the default subvolume by passing a subvolume id of 0. Signed-off-by:
chandan <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
In btrfs_sync_file(), if the call to btrfs_log_dentry_safe() returns a negative error (for e.g. -ENOMEM via btrfs_log_inode()), we would return without ending/freeing the transaction. Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
The BUG() was replaced by btrfs_error() and return -EIO with the patch "get rid of one BUG() in write_all_supers()", but the missing mutex_unlock() was overlooked. The 0-DAY kernel build service from Intel reported the missing unlock which was found by the coccinelle tool: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3422:2-8: preceding lock on line 3374 Signed-off-by:Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We don't do the iput when we fail to allocate our delayed delalloc work in __start_delalloc_inodes, fix this. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This isn't used for anything anymore, just remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Forever ago I made the worst case calculator say that we could potentially split into 3 blocks for every level on the way down, which isn't right. If we split we're only going to get two new blocks, the one we originally cow'ed and the new one we're going to split. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This reverts commit 70afa399. It is causing performance issues and wasn't actually correct. There were problems with the way we flushed delalloc and that was the real cause of the early enospc. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Various people have hit a deadlock when running btrfs/011. This is because when replacing nocow extents we will take the i_mutex to make sure nobody messes with the file while we are replacing the extent. The problem is we are already holding a transaction open, which is a locking inversion, so instead we need to save these inodes we find and then process them outside of the transaction. Further we can't just lock the inode and assume we are good to go. We need to lock the extent range and then read back the extent cache for the inode to make sure the extent really still points at the physical block we want. If it doesn't we don't have to copy it. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
So if we have dir_index items in the log that means we also have the inode item as well, which means that the inode's i_size is correct. However when we process dir_index'es we call btrfs_add_link() which will increase the directory's i_size for the new entry. To fix this we need to just set the dir items i_size to 0, and then as we find dir_index items we adjust the i_size. btrfs_add_link() will do it for new entries, and if the entry already exists we can just add the name_len to the i_size ourselves. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported a bug where his log would not replay because he was getting -EEXIST back. This was because he had a file moved into a directory that was logged. What happens is the file had a lower inode number, and so it is processed first when replaying the log, and so we add the inode ref in for the directory it was moved to. But then we process the directories DIR_INDEX item and try to add the inode ref for that inode and it fails because we already added it when we replayed the inode. To solve this problem we need to just process any DIR_INDEX items we have in the log first so this all is taken care of, and then we can replay the rest of the items. With this patch my reproducer can remount the file system properly instead of erroring out. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Liu introduced a local copy of the last log commit for an inode to make sure we actually log an inode even if a log commit has already taken place. In order to make sure we didn't relog the same inode multiple times he set this local copy to the current trans when we log the inode, because usually we log the inode and then sync the log. The exception to this is during rename, we will relog an inode if the name changed and it is already in the log. The problem with this is then we go to sync the inode, and our check to see if the inode has already been logged is tripped and we don't sync the log. To fix this we need to _also_ check against the roots last log commit, because it could be less than what is in our local copy of the log commit. This fixes a bug where we rename a file into a directory and then fsync the directory and then on remount the directory is no longer there. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If you just create a directory and then fsync that directory and then pull the power plug you will come back up and the directory will not be there. That is because we won't actually create directories if we've logged files inside of them since they will be created on replay, but in this check we will set our logged_trans of our current directory if it happens to be a directory, making us think it doesn't need to be logged. Fix the logic to only do this to parent directories. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
So forever we have had this thing to limit the amount of delalloc pages we'll setup to be written out to 128mb. This is because we have to lock all the pages in this range, so anything above this gets a bit unweildly, and also without a limit we'll happily allocate gigantic chunks of disk space. Turns out our check for this wasn't quite right, we wouldn't actually limit the chunk we wanted to write out, we'd just stop looking for more space after we went over the limit. So if you do a giant 20gb dd on my box with lots of ram I could get 2gig extents. This is fine normally, except when you go to relocate these extents and we can't find enough space to relocate these moster extents, since we have to be able to allocate exactly the same sized extent to move it around. So fix this by actually enforcing the limit. With this patch I'm no longer seeing giant 1.5gb extents. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
By the current code, if the requested size is very large, and all the extents in the free space cache are small, we will waste lots of the cpu time to cut the requested size in half and search the cache again and again until it gets down to the size the allocator can return. In fact, we can know the max extent size in the cache after the first search, so we needn't cut the size in half repeatedly, and just use the max extent size directly. This way can save lots of cpu time and make the performance grow up when there are only fragments in the free space cache. According to my test, if there are only 4KB free space extents in the fs, and the total size of those extents are 256MB, we can reduce the execute time of the following test from 5.4s to 1.4s. dd if=/dev/zero of=<testfile> bs=1MB count=1 oflag=sync Changelog v2 -> v3: - fix the problem that we skip the block group with the space which is less than we need. Changelog v1 -> v2: - address the problem that we return a wrong start position when searching the free space in a bitmap. Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
We want to know if there are debugging features compiled in, this may affect performance. The message is printed before the sanity checks. (This commit message is a copy of David Sterba's commit message when he introduced btrfs_print_info()). Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
Instead of removing the current inode from the red black tree and then add the new one, just use the red black tree replace operation, which is more efficient. Signed-off-by:
Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
If replace was suspended by the umount, replace target device is added to the fs_devices->alloc_list during a later mount. This is obviously wrong. ->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace is supposed to guard against that, but ->is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace is (and can only ever be) initialized *after* everything is opened and fs_devices lists are populated. Fix this by checking the devid instead: for replace targets it's always equal to BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just move on to the next extent. So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Linux 3.11
-
- 02 Sep, 2013 4 commits
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsiLinus Torvalds authored
Pull SCSI fix from James Bottomley: "This is a bug fix for the pm80xx driver. It turns out that when the new hardware support was added in 3.10 the IO command size was kept at the old hard coded value. This means that the driver attaches to some new cards and then simply hangs the system" * tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi: [SCSI] pm80xx: fix Adaptec 71605H hang
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tipLinus Torvalds authored
Pull x86 boot fix from Peter Anvin: "A single very small boot fix for very large memory systems (> 0.5T)" * 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/mm: Fix boot crash with DEBUG_PAGE_ALLOC=y and more than 512G RAM
-
git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dmaLinus Torvalds authored
Pull slave-dma fix from Vinod Koul: "A fix for resolving TI_EDMA driver's build error in allmodconfig to have filter function built in"" * 'fixes' of git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma: dma/Kconfig: TI_EDMA needs to be boolean
-
- 01 Sep, 2013 6 commits
-
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
When the binary search returns 0 (exact match), the target key will necessarily be at slot 0 of all nodes below the current one, so in this case the binary search is not needed because it will always return 0, and we waste time doing it, holding node locks for longer than necessary, etc. Below follow histograms with the times spent on the current approach of doing a binary search when the previous binary search returned 0, and times for the new approach, which directly picks the first item/child node in the leaf/node. Current approach: Count: 6682 Range: 35.000 - 8370.000; Mean: 85.837; Median: 75.000; Stddev: 106.429 Percentiles: 90th: 124.000; 95th: 145.000; 99th: 206.000 35.000 - 61.080: 1235 ################ 61.080 - 106.053: 4207 ##################################################### 106.053 - 183.606: 1122 ############## 183.606 - 317.341: 111 # 317.341 - 547.959: 6 | 547.959 - 8370.000: 1 | Approach proposed by this patch: Count: 6682 Range: 6.000 - 135.000; Mean: 16.690; Median: 16.000; Stddev: 7.160 Percentiles: 90th: 23.000; 95th: 27.000; 99th: 40.000 6.000 - 8.418: 58 # 8.418 - 11.670: 1149 ######################### 11.670 - 16.046: 2418 ##################################################### 16.046 - 21.934: 2098 ############################################## 21.934 - 29.854: 744 ################ 29.854 - 40.511: 154 ### 40.511 - 54.848: 41 # 54.848 - 74.136: 5 | 74.136 - 100.087: 9 | 100.087 - 135.000: 6 | These samples were captured during a run of the btrfs tests 001, 002 and 004 in the xfstests, with a leaf/node size of 4Kb. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We only need an async starter if we can't make a GFP_NOFS allocation in our current path. This is the case for the endio stuff since it happens in IRQ context, but things like the caching thread workers and the delalloc flushers we can easily make this allocation and start threads right away. Also change the worker count for the caching thread pool. Traditionally we limited this to 2 since we took read locks while caching, but nowadays we do this lockless so there's no reason to limit the number of caching threads. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This fixes a problem where if we fail a truncate we will leave the i_size set where we wanted to truncate to instead of where we were able to truncate to. Fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items do the disk_i_size update as it removes extents, that way it will always be consistent with where its extents are. Then if the truncate fails at all we can update the in-ram i_size with what we have on disk and delete the orphan item. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
If there's an ongoing transaction when the uuid scan kthread attempts to create one, the kthread will block, waiting for that transaction to finish while it's keeping locks on the tree root, and in turn the existing transaction is waiting for those locks to be free. The stack trace reported by the kernel follows. [36700.671601] INFO: task btrfs-uuid:15480 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [36700.671602] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [36700.671602] btrfs-uuid D 0000000000000000 0 15480 2 0x00000000 [36700.671604] ffff880710bd5b88 0000000000000046 ffff8803d36ba850 0000000000030000 [36700.671605] ffff8806d76dc530 ffff880710bd5fd8 ffff880710bd5fd8 ffff880710bd5fd8 [36700.671607] ffff8808098ac530 ffff8806d76dc530 ffff880710bd5b98 ffff8805e4508e40 [36700.671608] Call Trace: [36700.671610] [<ffffffff816f36b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [36700.671620] [<ffffffffa05a3bdf>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs] [36700.671623] [<ffffffff81066760>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [36700.671629] [<ffffffffa05a5b06>] start_transaction+0x3d6/0x530 [btrfs] [36700.671636] [<ffffffffa05bb1f4>] ? btrfs_get_token_32+0x64/0xf0 [btrfs] [36700.671642] [<ffffffffa05a5fbb>] btrfs_start_transaction+0x1b/0x20 [btrfs] [36700.671649] [<ffffffffa05c8a81>] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x211/0x3d0 [btrfs] [36700.671655] [<ffffffffa05c8870>] ? __btrfs_open_devices+0x2a0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [36700.671657] [<ffffffff81065fa0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [36700.671659] [<ffffffff81065ee0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [36700.671661] [<ffffffff816fcd1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [36700.671662] [<ffffffff81065ee0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [36700.671663] INFO: task btrfs:15481 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [36700.671664] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [36700.671665] btrfs D 0000000000000000 0 15481 15212 0x00000004 [36700.671666] ffff880248cbf4c8 0000000000000086 ffff8803d36ba700 ffff8801dbd5c280 [36700.671668] ffff880807815c40 ffff880248cbffd8 ffff880248cbffd8 ffff880248cbffd8 [36700.671669] ffff8805e86a0000 ffff880807815c40 ffff880248cbf4d8 ffff8801dbd5c280 [36700.671670] Call Trace: [36700.671672] [<ffffffff816f36b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [36700.671679] [<ffffffffa05d9b0d>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x6d/0x230 [btrfs] [36700.671680] [<ffffffff81066760>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [36700.671685] [<ffffffffa0582829>] btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0xb00 [btrfs] [36700.671691] [<ffffffffa05bd9de>] ? btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent+0x5e/0xb0 [btrfs] [36700.671698] [<ffffffffa05e3e54>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8c4/0xa80 [btrfs] [36700.671704] [<ffffffffa05e4362>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0xb2/0xf0 [btrfs] [36700.671710] [<ffffffffa05c4441>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs] [36700.671716] [<ffffffffa0594c82>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x562/0x650 [btrfs] [36700.671723] [<ffffffffa0610092>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x171/0x24b [btrfs] [36700.671729] [<ffffffffa05a4dde>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4fe/0xa10 [btrfs] [36700.671735] [<ffffffffa0610af3>] create_subvol+0x5c0/0x636 [btrfs] [36700.671742] [<ffffffffa05d49ff>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.60+0x33f/0x3f0 [btrfs] [36700.671747] [<ffffffffa05d4bf2>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x142/0x190 [btrfs] [36700.671752] [<ffffffffa05d4c6c>] ? btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2c/0x80 [btrfs] [36700.671757] [<ffffffffa05d4c9e>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x5e/0x80 [btrfs] [36700.671759] [<ffffffff8113a764>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x84/0x920 [36700.671764] [<ffffffffa05d87eb>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf0b/0x1d00 [btrfs] [36700.671766] [<ffffffff8113c120>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x210/0x310 [36700.671768] [<ffffffff816f83a4>] ? __do_page_fault+0x284/0x4e0 [36700.671770] [<ffffffff81180aa6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x550 [36700.671772] [<ffffffff81170fe3>] ? __sb_end_write+0x33/0x70 [36700.671774] [<ffffffff81180ff1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [36700.671775] [<ffffffff816fcdc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
AFAICT chunk 0 is no longer special, and so it should be restriped just like every other chunk. One reason for this change is us refusing the relocation can lead to filesystems that can only be mounted ro, and never rw -- see the bugzilla [1] for details. The other reason is that device removal code is already doing this: it will happily relocate chunk 0 is part of shrinking the device. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60594Reported-by:
Xavier Bassery <xavier@bartica.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
Signed-off-by:
-
