1. 22 May, 2012 33 commits
  2. 20 May, 2012 7 commits
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md/raid10: split out interpretation of layout to separate function. · deb200d0
      NeilBrown authored
      We will soon be interpreting the layout (and chunksize etc) from
      multiple places to support reshape.  So split it out into separate
      function.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      deb200d0
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md/raid10: Introduce 'prev' geometry to support reshape. · f8c9e74f
      NeilBrown authored
      When RAID10 supports reshape it will need a 'previous' and a 'current'
      geometry, so introduce that here.
      Use the 'prev' geometry when before the reshape_position, and the
      current 'geo' when beyond it.  At other times, use both as
      appropriate.
      
      For now, both are identical (And reshape_position is never set).
      
      When we use the 'prev' geometry, we must use the old data_offset.
      When we use the current (And a reshape is happening) we must use
      the new_data_offset.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      f8c9e74f
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md: use resync_max_sectors for reshape as well as resync. · c804cdec
      NeilBrown authored
      Some resync type operations need to act on the address space of the
      device, others on the address space of the array.
      
      This only affects RAID10, so it sets resync_max_sectors to the array
      size (it defaults to the device size), and that is currently used for
      resync only.  However reshape of a RAID10 must be done against the
      array size, not device size, so change code to use resync_max_sectors
      for both the resync and the reshape cases.
      This does not affect RAID5 or RAID1, just RAID10.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      c804cdec
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md: teach sync_page_io about new_data_offset. · 1fdd6fc9
      NeilBrown authored
      Some code in raid1 and raid10 use sync_page_io to
      read/write pages when responding to read errors.
      As we will shortly support changing data_offset for
      raid10, this function must understand new_data_offset.
      
      So add that understanding.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      1fdd6fc9
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md/raid10: collect some geometry fields into a dedicated structure. · 5cf00fcd
      NeilBrown authored
      We will shortly be adding reshape support for RAID10 which will
      require it having 2 concurrent geometries (before and after).
      To make that easier, collect most geometry fields into 'struct geom'
      and access them from there.  Then we will more easily be able to add
      a second set of fields.
      
      Note that 'copies' is not in this struct and so cannot be changed.
      There is little need to change this number and doing so is a lot
      more difficult as it requires reallocating more things.
      So leave it out for now.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      5cf00fcd
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md/raid5: allow for change in data_offset while managing a reshape. · b5254dd5
      NeilBrown authored
      The important issue here is incorporating the different in data_offset
      into calculations concerning when we might need to over-write data
      that is still thought to be valid.
      
      To this end we find the minimum offset difference across all devices
      and add that where appropriate.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      b5254dd5
    • NeilBrown's avatar
      md/raid5: Use correct data_offset for all IO. · 05616be5
      NeilBrown authored
      As there can now be two different data_offsets - an 'old' and
      a 'new' - we need to carefully choose between them.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      05616be5