- 14 Sep, 2020 34 commits
-
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Add a bunch of test-cases for multiple subflow xmit: create multiple subflows simulating different links condition via netem and verify that the msk is able to use completely the aggregated bandwidth. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
That is needed to let the subflows announce promptly when new space is available in the receive buffer. tcp_cleanup_rbuf() is currently a static function, drop the scope modifier and add a declaration in the TCP header. Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Update the scheduler to less trivial heuristic: cache the last used subflow, and try to send on it a reasonably long burst of data. When the burst or the subflow send space is exhausted, pick the subflow with the lower ratio between write space and send buffer - that is, the subflow with the greater relative amount of free space. v1 -> v2: - fix 32 bit build breakage due to 64bits div - fix checkpath issues (uint64_t -> u64) Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Currently the 'backup' attribute of local endpoint is ignored. Let's use it for the MP_JOIN handshake Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
So that can be accessed easily from the subflow creation helper. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Add a bunch of MPTCP mibs related to MPTCP OoO data processing. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
There is no need to use the tcp_read_sock(), we can simply drop the skb. Additionally try to look at the next buffer for in order data. This both simplifies the code and avoid unneeded indirect calls. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Add an RB-tree to cope with OoO (at MPTCP level) data. __mptcp_move_skb() insert into the RB tree "future" data, eventually coalescing skb as allowed by the MPTCP DSN. To simplify sequence accounting, move the DSN inside the cb. After successfully enqueuing in sequence data, check if we can use any data from the RB tree. Additionally move the data_fin check after spooling data from the OoO tree, otherwise we could miss shutdown events. The RB tree code is copied as verbatim as possible from tcp_data_queue_ofo(), with a few simplifications due to the fact that MPTCP doesn't need to cope with sacks. All bugs here are added by me. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Factor-out existing code, will be re-used by the next patch. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Let the msk sendbuf track the size of the larger subflow's send window, so that we ensure mptcp_sendmsg() does not exceed MPTCP-level send window. The update is performed just before try to send any data. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
This is a prerequisite to allow receiving data from multiple subflows without re-injection. Instead of dropping the OoO - "future" data in subflow_check_data_avail(), call into __mptcp_move_skbs() and let the msk drop that. To avoid code duplication factor out the mptcp_subflow_discard_data() helper. Note that __mptcp_move_skbs() can now find multiple subflows with data avail (comprising to-be-discarded data), so must update the byte counter incrementally. v1 -> v2: - fix checkpatch issues (unsigned -> unsigned int) Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
This simplify mptcp_subflow_data_available() and will made follow-up patches simpler. Additionally remove the unneeded checks on subflow copied_seq: we always whole skbs out of subflows. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Paolo Abeni authored
Currently, when checking for the 'msk is writable' condition, we look at the individual subflows write space. That works well while we send data via a single subflow, but will not as soon as we will enable concurrent xmit on multiple subflows. With this change msk becomes writable when the following conditions hold: - the socket has some free write space - there is at least a subflow with write free space Additionally we need to set the NOSPACE bit on all subflows before blocking. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
David S. Miller authored
Allen Pais says: ==================== ethernet: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup API Commit 12cc923f ("tasklet: Introduce new initialization API")' introduced a new tasklet initialization API. This series converts all the crypto modules to use the new tasklet_setup() API This series is based on v5.9-rc5 v3: fix subject prefix use backpointer instead of fragile priv to netdev. v2: fix kdoc reported by Jakub Kicinski. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Allen Pais authored
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup() and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly. Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 Sep, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag. It has been compile tested. When memory is allocated in 'tulip_init_one()' GFP_KERNEL can be used because it is a probe function and no lock is taken in the between. @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE + DMA_TO_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE + DMA_FROM_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_NONE + DMA_NONE @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; @@ - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag. It has been compile tested. When memory is allocated in 'de_alloc_rings()' GFP_KERNEL can be used because it is only called from 'de_open()' which is a '.ndo_open' function. Such functions are synchronized using the rtnl_lock() semaphore and no lock is taken in the between. @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE + DMA_TO_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE + DMA_FROM_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_NONE + DMA_NONE @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; @@ - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag. It has been compile tested. When memory is allocated in 'dmfe_init_one()' GFP_KERNEL can be used because it is a probe function and no lock is taken in the between. @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE + DMA_TO_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE + DMA_FROM_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_NONE + DMA_NONE @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; @@ - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag. It has been compile tested. When memory is allocated in 'uli526x_init_one()' GFP_KERNEL can be used because it is a probe function and no lock is taken in the between. @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE + DMA_TO_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE + DMA_FROM_DEVICE @@ @@ - PCI_DMA_NONE + DMA_NONE @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3; @@ - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; @@ - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Russell King authored
Richard Cochran points out that SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS should be set when the skbuff is queued for timestamping. Add this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
'w89c840_open()' is incorrectly reported in a debug message. Use __func__ instead. While at it, fix some style issue in the same function. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-