- 17 Jun, 2020 4 commits
-
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fsLinus Torvalds authored
Pull AFS fixes from David Howells: "I've managed to get xfstests kind of working with afs. Here are a set of patches that fix most of the bugs found. There are a number of primary issues: - Incorrect handling of mtime and non-handling of ctime. It might be argued, that the latter isn't a bug since the AFS protocol doesn't support ctime, but I should probably still update it locally. - Shared-write mmap, truncate and writeback bugs. This includes not changing i_size under the callback lock, overwriting local i_size with the reply from the server after a partial writeback, not limiting the writeback from an mmapped page to EOF. - Checks for an abort code indicating that the primary vnode in an operation was deleted by a third-party are done in the wrong place. - Silly rename bugs. This includes an incomplete conversion to the new operation handling, duplicate nlink handling, nlink changing not being done inside the callback lock and insufficient handling of third-party conflicting directory changes. And some secondary ones: - The UAEOVERFLOW abort code should map to EOVERFLOW not EREMOTEIO. - Remove a couple of unused or incompletely used bits. - Remove a couple of redundant success checks. These seem to fix all the data-corruption bugs found by ./check -afs -g quick along with the obvious silly rename bugs and time bugs. There are still some test failures, but they seem to fall into two classes: firstly, the authentication/security model is different to the standard UNIX model and permission is arbitrated by the server and cached locally; and secondly, there are a number of features that AFS does not support (such as mknod). But in these cases, the tests themselves need to be adapted or skipped. Using the in-kernel afs client with xfstests also found a bug in the AuriStor AFS server that has been fixed for a future release" * tag 'afs-fixes-20200616' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs: afs: Fix silly rename afs: afs_vnode_commit_status() doesn't need to check the RPC error afs: Fix use of afs_check_for_remote_deletion() afs: Remove afs_operation::abort_code afs: Fix yfs_fs_fetch_status() to honour vnode selector afs: Remove yfs_fs_fetch_file_status() as it's not used afs: Fix the mapping of the UAEOVERFLOW abort code afs: Fix truncation issues and mmap writeback size afs: Concoct ctimes afs: Fix EOF corruption afs: afs_write_end() should change i_size under the right lock afs: Fix non-setting of mtime when writing into mmap
-
Randy Dunlap authored
Remove SH-5 documentation index entries following the removal of SH-5 source code. Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/mm/tlb-sh5.c Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/mm/tlb-sh5.c Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/include/asm/tlb_64.h Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/include/asm/tlb_64.h Fixes: 3b69e8b4 ("Merge tag 'sh-for-5.8' of git://git.libc.org/linux-sh") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Linus Torvalds authored
Merge tag 'flex-array-conversions-5.8-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux Pull flexible-array member conversions from Gustavo A. R. Silva: "Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members. Notice that all of these patches have been baking in linux-next for two development cycles now. There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. C99 introduced “flexible array members”, which lacks a numeric size for the array declaration entirely: struct something { size_t count; struct foo items[]; }; This is the way the kernel expects dynamically sized trailing elements to be declared. It allows the compiler to generate errors when the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which helps to prevent some kind of undefined behavior[3] bugs from being inadvertently introduced to the codebase. It also allows the compiler to correctly analyze array sizes (via sizeof(), CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, and CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS). For instance, there is no mechanism that warns us that the following application of the sizeof() operator to a zero-length array always results in zero: struct something { size_t count; struct foo items[0]; }; struct something *instance; instance = kmalloc(struct_size(instance, items, count), GFP_KERNEL); instance->count = count; size = sizeof(instance->items) * instance->count; memcpy(instance->items, source, size); At the last line of code above, size turns out to be zero, when one might have thought it represents the total size in bytes of the dynamic memory recently allocated for the trailing array items. Here are a couple examples of this issue[4][5]. Instead, flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof() operator may not be applied[6], so any misuse of such operators will be immediately noticed at build time. The cleanest and least error-prone way to implement this is through the use of a flexible array member: struct something { size_t count; struct foo items[]; }; struct something *instance; instance = kmalloc(struct_size(instance, items, count), GFP_KERNEL); instance->count = count; size = sizeof(instance->items[0]) * instance->count; memcpy(instance->items, source, size); instead" [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") [4] commit f2cd32a4 ("rndis_wlan: Remove logically dead code") [5] commit ab91c2a8 ("tpm: eventlog: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member") [6] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html * tag 'flex-array-conversions-5.8-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (41 commits) w1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array tracing/probe: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array soc: ti: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array tifm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array dmaengine: tegra-apb: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Squashfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array ASoC: SOF: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array ima: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array sctp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array phy: samsung: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array RxRPC: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array rapidio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array media: pwc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array firmware: pcdp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array oprofile: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array block: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array tools/testing/nvdimm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array libata: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array kprobes: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array ...
-
Arvind Sankar authored
The purgatory Makefile removes -fstack-protector options if they were configured in, but does not currently add -fno-stack-protector. If gcc was configured with the --enable-default-ssp configure option, this results in the stack protector still being enabled for the purgatory (absent distro-specific specs files that might disable it again for freestanding compilations), if the main kernel is being compiled with stack protection enabled (if it's disabled for the main kernel, the top-level Makefile will add -fno-stack-protector). This will break the build since commit e4160b2e ("x86/purgatory: Fail the build if purgatory.ro has missing symbols") and prior to that would have caused runtime failure when trying to use kexec. Explicitly add -fno-stack-protector to avoid this, as done in other Makefiles that need to disable the stack protector. Reported-by: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 Jun, 2020 36 commits
-
-
David Howells authored
Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means: (1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest grumbling. (2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and rename. The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further, ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted. However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we just removed a link from. The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the FS.Rename RPC op. (3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode. (4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we actually deleted the file or not. (5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as 0, not 1. Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests. Fixes: e49c7b2f ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfdLinus Torvalds authored
Pull MFD fix from Lee Jones: "Fix NULL pointer dereference in mt6360 driver" * tag 'mfd-fixes-5.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd: mfd: mt6360: Fix register driver NULL pointer by adding driver name
-
David Howells authored
afs_vnode_commit_status() is only ever called if op->error is 0, so remove the op->error checks from the function. Fixes: e49c7b2f ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
David Howells authored
afs_check_for_remote_deletion() checks to see if error ENOENT is returned by the server in response to an operation and, if so, marks the primary vnode as having been deleted as the FID is no longer valid. However, it's being called from the operation success functions, where no abort has happened - and if an inline abort is recorded, it's handled by afs_vnode_commit_status(). Fix this by actually calling the operation aborted method if provided and having that point to afs_check_for_remote_deletion(). Fixes: e49c7b2f ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
David Howells authored
Remove afs_operation::abort_code as it's read but never set. Use ac.abort_code instead. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
David Howells authored
Fix yfs_fs_fetch_status() to honour the vnode selector in op->fetch_status.which as does afs_fs_fetch_status() that allows afs_do_lookup() to use this as an alternative to the InlineBulkStatus RPC call if not implemented by the server. This doesn't matter in the current code as YFS servers always implement InlineBulkStatus, but a subsequent will call it on YFS servers too in some circumstances. Fixes: e49c7b2f ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
David Howells authored
Remove yfs_fs_fetch_file_status() as it's no longer used. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
Gene Chen authored
The driver name was accidentally removed when .probe() by was replaced by .probe_new() during an early patch review. [ 121.243012] EAX: c2a8bc64 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 [ 121.243012] ESI: c2a8bc79 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e54bdea8 ESP: e54bdea0 [ 121.243012] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 121.243012] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 02ec3000 CR4: 000006b0 [ 121.243012] Call Trace: [ 121.243012] kset_find_obj+0x3d/0xc0 [ 121.243012] driver_find+0x16/0x40 [ 121.243012] driver_register+0x49/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? i2c_for_each_dev+0x39/0x50 [ 121.243012] ? __process_new_adapter+0x20/0x20 [ 121.243012] ? cht_wc_driver_init+0x11/0x11 [ 121.243012] i2c_register_driver+0x30/0x80 [ 121.243012] ? intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x16/0x16 [ 121.243012] mt6360_pmu_driver_init+0xf/0x11 [ 121.243012] do_one_initcall+0x33/0x1a0 [ 121.243012] ? parse_args+0x1eb/0x3d0 [ 121.243012] ? __might_sleep+0x31/0x90 [ 121.243012] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x10a/0x17f [ 121.243012] kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x17f [ 121.243012] ? rest_init+0x110/0x110 [ 121.243012] kernel_init+0xb/0x100 [ 121.243012] ? schedule_tail_wrapper+0x9/0xc [ 121.243012] ret_from_fork+0x19/0x24 [ 121.243012] Modules linked in: [ 121.243012] CR2: 0000000000000000 [ 121.243012] random: get_random_bytes called from init_oops_id+0x3a/0x40 with crng_init=0 [ 121.243012] ---[ end trace 38a803400f1a2bee ]--- [ 121.243012] EIP: strcmp+0x11/0x30 Fixes: 7edd3634 ("mfd: Add support for PMIC MT6360") Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <gene_chen@richtek.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org> [Lee: Taking the opportunity to fix the compatible string too 's/_/-/'] Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
-