- 02 Apr, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Chris Down authored
The write side of this is xchg()/smp_mb(), so that's all good. Just a few sites missing a READ_ONCE. Signed-off-by:
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bbec2c3d822217334855c8877a9d28b2a6d395fb.1584034301.git.chris@chrisdown.nameSigned-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Chris Down authored
This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value to be propagated. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Down authored
This can be set concurrently with reads, which may cause the wrong value to be propagated. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Down authored
This one is a bit more nuanced because we have memcg_max_mutex, which is mostly just used for enforcing invariants, but we still need to READ_ONCE since (despite its name) it doesn't really protect memory.max access. On write (page_counter_set_max() and memory_max_write()) we use xchg(), which uses smp_mb(), so that's already fine. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Down authored
A mem_cgroup's high attribute can be concurrently set at the same time as we are trying to read it -- for example, if we are in memory_high_write at the same time as we are trying to do high reclaim. Signed-off-by:
-
Vincenzo Frascino authored
mem_cgroup_id_get_many() is currently used only when MMU or MEMCG_SWAP configuration options are enabled. Having them disabled triggers the following warning at compile time: linux/mm/memcontrol.c:4797:13: warning: `mem_cgroup_id_get_many' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static void mem_cgroup_id_get_many(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n) Make mem_cgroup_id_get_many() __maybe_unused to address the issue. Signed-off-by:
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by:
-
Shakeel Butt authored
Currently multiple locations in memcg code, css_tryget_online() is being used. However it doesn't matter whether the cgroup is online for the callers. Online used to matter when we had reparenting on offlining and we needed a way to prevent new ones from showing up. The failure case for couple of these css_tryget_online usage is to fallback to root_mem_cgroup which kind of make bypassing the memcg limits possible for some workloads. For example creating an inotify group in a subcontainer and then deleting that container after moving the process to a different container will make all the event objects allocated for that group to the root_mem_cgroup. So, using css_tryget_online() is dangerous for such cases. Two locations still use the online version. The swapin of offlined memcg's pages and the memcg kmem cache creation. The kmem cache indeed needs the online version as the kernel does the reparenting of memcg kmem caches. For the swapin case, it has been left for later as the fallback is not really that concerning. With swap accounting enabled, if the memcg of the swapped out page is not online then the memcg extracted from the given 'mm' will be charged and if 'mm' is NULL then root memcg will be charged. However I could not find a code path where the given 'mm' will be NULL for swap-in case. Signed-off-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Weiner authored
Right now, the effective protection of any given cgroup is capped by its own explicit memory.low setting, regardless of what the parent says. The reasons for this are mostly historical and ease of implementation: to make delegation of memory.low safe, effective protection is the min() of all memory.low up the tree. Unfortunately, this limitation makes it impossible to protect an entire subtree from another without forcing the user to make explicit protection allocations all the way to the leaf cgroups - something that is highly undesirable in real life scenarios. Consider memory in a data center host. At the cgroup top level, we have a distinction between system management software and the actual workload the system is executing. Both branches are further subdivided into individual services, job components etc. We want to protect the workload as a whole from the system management software, but that doesn't mean we want to protect and prioritize individual workload wrt each other. Their memory demand can vary over time, and we'd want the VM to simply cache the hottest data within the workload subtree. Yet, the current memory.low limitations force us to allocate a fixed amount of protection to each workload component in order to get protection from system management software in general. This results in very inefficient resource distribution. Another concern with mandating downward allocation is that, as the complexity of the cgroup tree grows, it gets harder for the lower levels to be informed about decisions made at the host-level. Consider a container inside a namespace that in turn creates its own nested tree of cgroups to run multiple workloads. It'd be extremely difficult to configure memory.low parameters in those leaf cgroups that on one hand balance pressure among siblings as the container desires, while also reflecting the host-level protection from e.g. rpm upgrades, that lie beyond one or more delegation and namespacing points in the tree. It's highly unusual from a cgroup interface POV that nested levels have to be aware of and reflect decisions made at higher levels for them to be effective. To enable such use cases and scale configurability for complex trees, this patch implements a resource inheritance model for memory that is similar to how the CPU and the IO controller implement work-conserving resource allocations: a share of a resource allocated to a subree always applies to the entire subtree recursively, while allowing, but not mandating, children to further specify distribution rules. That means that if protection is explicitly allocated among siblings, those configured shares are being followed during page reclaim just like they are now. However, if the memory.low set at a higher level is not fully claimed by the children in that subtree, the "floating" remainder is applied to each cgroup in the tree in proportion to its size. Since reclaim pressure is applied in proportion to size as well, each child in that tree gets the same boost, and the effect is neutral among siblings - with respect to each other, they behave as if no memory control was enabled at all, and the VM simply balances the memory demands optimally within the subtree. But collectively those cgroups enjoy a boost over the cgroups in neighboring trees. E.g. a leaf cgroup with a memory.low setting of 0 no longer means that it's not getting a share of the hierarchically assigned resource, just that it doesn't claim a fixed amount of it to protect from its siblings. This allows us to recursively protect one subtree (workload) from another (system management), while letting subgroups compete freely among each other - without having to assign fixed shares to each leaf, and without nested groups having to echo higher-level settings. The floating protection composes naturally with fixed protection. Consider the following example tree: A A: low = 2G / \ A1: low = 1G A1 A2 A2: low = 0G As outside pressure is applied to this tree, A1 will enjoy a fixed protection from A2 of 1G, but the remaining, unclaimed 1G from A is split evenly among A1 and A2, coming out to 1.5G and 0.5G. There is a slight risk of regressing theoretical setups where the top-level cgroups don't know about the true budgeting and set bogusly high "bypass" values that are meaningfully allocated down the tree. Such setups would rely on unclaimed protection to be discarded, and distributing it would change the intended behavior. Be safe and hide the new behavior behind a mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'. Signed-off-by:Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by:
-
Johannes Weiner authored
The effective protection of any given cgroup is a somewhat complicated construct that depends on the ancestor's configuration, siblings' configurations, as well as current memory utilization in all these groups. It's done this way to satisfy hierarchical delegation requirements while also making the configuration semantics flexible and expressive in complex real life scenarios. Unfortunately, all the rules and requirements are sparsely documented, and the code is a little too clever in merging different scenarios into a single min() expression. This makes it hard to reason about the implementation and avoid breaking semantics when making changes to it. This patch documents each semantic rule individually and splits out the handling of the overcommit case from the regular case. Michal Koutný also points out that the points of equilibrium as described in the existing example scenarios aren't actually accurate. Delete these examples for now to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Weiner authored
Patch series "mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protection", v3. The current memory.low (and memory.min) semantics require protection to be assigned to a cgroup in an untinterrupted chain from the top-level cgroup all the way to the leaf. In practice, we want to protect entire cgroup subtrees from each other (system management software vs. workload), but we would like the VM to balance memory optimally *within* each subtree, without having to make explicit weight allocations among individual components. The current semantics make that impossible. They also introduce unmanageable complexity into more advanced resource trees. For example: host root `- system.slice `- rpm upgrades `- logging `- workload.slice `- a container `- system.slice `- workload.slice `- job A `- component 1 `- component 2 `- job B At a host-level perspective, we would like to protect the outer workload.slice subtree as a whole from rpm upgrades, logging etc. But for that to be effective, right now we'd have to propagate it down through the container, the inner workload.slice, into the job cgroup and ultimately the component cgroups where memory is actually, physically allocated. This may cross several tree delegation points and namespace boundaries, which make such a setup near impossible. CPU and IO on the other hand are already distributed recursively. The user would simply configure allowances at the host level, and they would apply to the entire subtree without any downward propagation. To enable the above-mentioned usecases and bring memory in line with other resource controllers, this patch series extends memory.low/min such that settings apply recursively to the entire subtree. Users can still assign explicit shares in subgroups, but if they don't, any ancestral protection will be distributed such that children compete freely amongst each other - as if no memory control were enabled inside the subtree - but enjoy protection from neighboring trees. In the above example, the user would then be able to configure shares of CPU, IO and memory at the host level to comprehensively protect and isolate the workload.slice as a whole from system.slice activity. Patch #1 fixes an existing bug that can give a cgroup tree more protection than it should receive as per ancestor configuration. Patch #2 simplifies and documents the existing code to make it easier to reason about the changes in the next patch. Patch #3 finally implements recursive memory protection semantics. Because of a risk of regressing legacy setups, the new semantics are hidden behind a cgroup2 mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'. More details in patch #3. This patch (of 3): When memory.low is overcommitted - i.e. the children claim more protection than their shared ancestor grants them - the allowance is distributed in proportion to how much each sibling uses their own declared protection: low_usage = min(memory.low, memory.current) elow = parent_elow * (low_usage / siblings_low_usage) However, siblings_low_usage is not the sum of all low_usages. It sums up the usages of *only those cgroups that are within their memory.low* That means that low_usage can be *bigger* than siblings_low_usage, and consequently the total protection afforded to the children can be bigger than what the ancestor grants the subtree. Consider three groups where two are in excess of their protection: A/memory.low = 10G A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 8G siblings_low_usage = 8G (only A3 contributes) A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 12.5G -> 10G A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(8G) = 10.0G (the 12.5G are capped to the explicit memory.low setting of 10G) With that, the sum of all awarded protection below A is 30G, when A only grants 10G for the entire subtree. What does this mean in practice? A1 and A2 would still be in excess of their 10G allowance and would be reclaimed, whereas A3 would not. As they eventually drop below their protection setting, they would be counted in siblings_low_usage again and the error would right itself. When reclaim was applied in a binary fashion (cgroup is reclaimed when it's above its protection, otherwise it's skipped) this would actually work out just fine. However, since 1bc63fb1 ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection"), reclaim pressure is scaled to how much a cgroup is above its protection. As a result this calculation error unduly skews pressure away from A1 and A2 toward the rest of the system. But why did we do it like this in the first place? The reasoning behind exempting groups in excess from siblings_low_usage was to go after them first during reclaim in an overcommitted subtree: A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 4G A/A1/memory.low = 3G, memory.current = 2G A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2G siblings_low_usage = 2G (only A1 contributes) A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(2G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 2G A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G While the children combined are overcomitting A and are technically both at fault, A2 is actively declaring unprotected memory and we would like to reclaim that first. However, while this sounds like a noble goal on the face of it, it doesn't make much difference in actual memory distribution: Because A is overcommitted, reclaim will not stop once A2 gets pushed back to within its allowance; we'll have to reclaim A1 either way. The end result is still that protection is distributed proportionally, with A1 getting 3/4 (1.5G) and A2 getting 1/4 (0.5G) of A's allowance. [ If A weren't overcommitted, it wouldn't make a difference since each cgroup would just get the protection it declares: A/memory.low = 2G, memory.current = 3G A/A1/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 1G A/A2/memory.low = 1G, memory.current = 2G With the current calculation: siblings_low_usage = 1G (only A1 contributes) A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(1G) = 2G -> 1G Including excess groups in siblings_low_usage: siblings_low_usage = 2G A1/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G A2/elow = parent_elow(2G) * low_usage(1G) / siblings_low_usage(2G) = 1G -> 1G ] Simplify the calculation and fix the proportional reclaim bug by including excess cgroups in siblings_low_usage. After this patch, the effective memory.low distribution from the example above would be as follows: A/memory.low = 10G A/A1/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A2/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 20G A/A3/memory.low = 10G, memory.current = 8G siblings_low_usage = 28G A1/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G A2/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(10G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 3.5G A3/elow = parent_elow(10G) * low_usage(8G) / siblings_low_usage(28G) = 2.8G Fixes: 1bc63fb1 ("mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection") Fixes: 23067153 ("mm: memory.low hierarchical behavior") Signed-off-by: -
Roman Gushchin authored
Drop the _memcg suffix from (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge functions. It's shorter and more obvious. These are the most basic functions which are just (un)charging the given cgroup with the given amount of pages. Also fix up the corresponding comments. Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
There are many places in memcg_charge_slab() and memcg_uncharge_slab() which are calculating the number of pages to charge, css references to grab etc depending on the order of the slab page. Let's simplify the code by calculating it once and caching in the local variable. Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
These functions are charging the given number of kernel pages to the given memory cgroup. The number doesn't have to be a power of two. Let's make them to take the unsigned int nr_pages as an argument instead of the page order. It makes them look consistent with the corresponding uncharge functions and functions like: mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, nr_pages). Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Rename (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page() to better reflect what they are actually doing: 1) call __memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg() to actually charge or uncharge the current memcg 2) set or clear the PageKmemcg flag Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Drop the unused page argument and put the memcg pointer at the first place. This make the function consistent with its peers: __memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg(), memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(), etc. Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Patch series "mm: memcg: kmem API cleanup", v2. This patchset aims to clean up the kernel memory charging API. It doesn't bring any functional changes, just removes unused arguments, renames some functions and fixes some comments. Currently it's not obvious which functions are most basic (memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg()) and which are based on them (memcg_kmem_(un)charge()). The patchset renames these functions and removes unused arguments: TL;DR: was: memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(page, gfp, order, memcg) memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg(memcg, nr_pages) memcg_kmem_charge(page, gfp, order) memcg_kmem_uncharge(page, order) now: memcg_kmem_charge(memcg, gfp, nr_pages) memcg_kmem_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages) memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order) memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(page, order) This patch (of 6): The first argument of memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() and __memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() is the page pointer and it's not used. Let's drop it. Memcg pointer is passed as the last argument. Move it to the first place for consistency with other memcg functions, e.g. __memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg() or try_charge(). Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Sometimes we need to get a memcg pointer from a charged kernel object. The right way to get it depends on whether it's a proper slab object or it's backed by raw pages (e.g. it's a vmalloc alloction). In the first case the kmem_cache->memcg_params.memcg indirection should be used; in other cases it's just page->mem_cgroup. To simplify this task and hide the implementation details let's use the mem_cgroup_from_obj() helper, which takes a pointer to any kernel object and returns a valid memcg pointer or NULL. Passing a kernel address rather than a pointer to a page will allow to use this helper for per-object (rather than per-page) tracked objects in the future. The caller is still responsible to ensure that the returned memcg isn't going away underneath: take the rcu read lock, cgroup mutex etc; depending on the context. mem_cgroup_from_kmem() defined in mm/list_lru.c is now obsolete and can be removed. Signed-off-by:
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117203609.3146239-1-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kirill Tkhai authored
The shrinker_map may be touched from any cpu (e.g., a bit there may be set by a task running everywhere) but kswapd is always bound to specific node. So allocate shrinker_map from the related NUMA node to respect its NUMA locality. Also, this follows generic way we use for allocation of memcg's per-node data. Signed-off-by:
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Yafang Shao authored
When I manually set default n to MEMCG_KMEM in init/Kconfig, bellow error occurs, mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_start': mm/slab_common.c:1530:30: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named 'kmem_caches' return seq_list_start(&memcg->kmem_caches, *pos); ^ mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_next': mm/slab_common.c:1537:32: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named 'kmem_caches' return seq_list_next(p, &memcg->kmem_caches, pos); ^ mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_show': mm/slab_common.c:1551:16: error: 'struct mem_cgroup' has no member named 'kmem_caches' if (p == memcg->kmem_caches.next) ^ CC arch/x86/xen/smp.o mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_start': mm/slab_common.c:1531:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ mm/slab_common.c: In function 'memcg_slab_next': mm/slab_common.c:1538:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ That's because kmem_caches is defined only when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is set, while memcg_slab_start() will use it no matter CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is defined or not. By the way, the reason I mannuly undefined CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is to verify whether my some other code change is still stable when CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not set. Unfortunately, the existing code has been already unstable since v4.11. Fixes: bc2791f8 ("slab: link memcg kmem_caches on their associated memory cgroup") Signed-off-by: -
Wei Yang authored
add_to_swap_cache() and delete_from_swap_cache() are counterparts, while currently they use different ways to count pages. It doesn't break anything because we only have two sizes for PageAnon, but this is confusing and not good practice. This patch corrects it by making both functions use hpage_nr_pages(). Signed-off-by:
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200315012920.2687-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yang Shi authored
Memory barrier is needed after setting LRU bit, but smp_mb() is too strong. Some architectures, i.e. x86, imply memory barrier with atomic operations, so replacing it with smp_mb__after_atomic() sounds better, which is nop on strong ordered machines, and full memory barriers on others. With this change the vm-scalability cases would perform better on x86, I saw total 6% improvement with this patch and previous inline fix. The test data (lru-file-readtwice throughput) against v5.6-rc4: mainline w/ inline fix w/ both (adding this) 150MB 154MB 159MB Fixes: 9c4e6b1a ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs") Signed-off-by:
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by:
-
Yang Shi authored
When backporting commit 9c4e6b1a ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs") to our 4.9 kernel, our test bench noticed around 10% down with a couple of vm-scalability's test cases (lru-file-readonce, lru-file-readtwice and lru-file-mmap-read). I didn't see that much down on my VM (32c-64g-2nodes). It might be caused by the test configuration, which is 32c-256g with NUMA disabled and the tests were run in root memcg, so the tests actually stress only one inactive and active lru. It sounds not very usual in mordern production environment. That commit did two major changes: 1. Call page_evictable() 2. Use smp_mb to force the PG_lru set visible It looks they contribute the most overhead. The page_evictable() is a function which does function prologue and epilogue, and that was used by page reclaim path only. However, lru add is a very hot path, so it sounds better to make it inline. However, it calls page_mapping() which is not inlined either, but the disassemble shows it doesn't do push and pop operations and it sounds not very straightforward to inline it. Other than this, it sounds smp_mb() is not necessary for x86 since SetPageLRU is atomic which enforces memory barrier already, replace it with smp_mb__after_atomic() in the following patch. With the two fixes applied, the tests can get back around 5% on that test bench and get back normal on my VM. Since the test bench configuration is not that usual and I also saw around 6% up on the latest upstream, so it sounds good enough IMHO. The below is test data (lru-file-readtwice throughput) against the v5.6-rc4: mainline w/ inline fix 150MB 154MB With this patch the throughput gets 2.67% up. The data with using smp_mb__after_atomic() is showed in the following patch. Shakeel Butt did the below test: On a real machine with limiting the 'dd' on a single node and reading 100 GiB sparse file (less than a single node). Just ran a single instance to not cause the lru lock contention. The cmdline used is "dd if=file-100GiB of=/dev/null bs=4k". Ran the cmd 10 times with drop_caches in between and measured the time it took. Without patch: 56.64143 +- 0.672 sec With patches: 56.10 +- 0.21 sec [akpm@linux-foundation.org: move page_evictable() to internal.h] Fixes: 9c4e6b1a ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs") Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
Currently we use a tmp pointer, pentry, to transfer and reset swap cache slot, which is a little redundant. Swap cache slot stores the entry value directly, assign and reset it by value would be straight forward. Also this patch merges the else and if, since this is the only case we refill and repeat swap cache. Signed-off-by:
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200311055352.50574-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by:
-
Qian Cai authored
si->inuse_pages could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, write to 0xffff98b00ebd04dc of 4 bytes by task 82262 on cpu 92: swap_range_free+0xbe/0x230 swap_range_free at mm/swapfile.c:719 swapcache_free_entries+0x1be/0x250 free_swap_slot+0x1c8/0x220 __swap_entry_free.constprop.19+0xa3/0xb0 free_swap_and_cache+0x53/0xa0 unmap_page_range+0x7e0/0x1ce0 unmap_single_vma+0xcd/0x170 unmap_vmas+0x18b/0x220 exit_mmap+0xee/0x220 mmput+0xe7/0x240 do_exit+0x598/0xfd0 do_group_exit+0x8b/0x180 get_signal+0x293/0x13d0 do_signal+0x37/0x5d0 prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1b7/0x2c0 ret_from_intr+0x32/0x42 read to 0xffff98b00ebd04dc of 4 bytes by task 82499 on cpu 46: try_to_unuse+0x86b/0xc80 try_to_unuse at mm/swapfile.c:2185 __x64_sys_swapoff+0x372/0xd40 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe The plain reads in try_to_unuse() are outside si->lock critical section which result in data races that could be dangerous to be used in a loop. Fix them by adding READ_ONCE(). Signed-off-by:
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
__pagevec_lru_add() is only used in mm directory now. Remove the export symbol. Signed-off-by:
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chen Wandun authored
The -EEXIST returned by __swap_duplicate means there is a swap cache instead -EBUSY Signed-off-by:
Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Pingfan Liu authored
FOLL_LONGTERM is a special case of FOLL_PIN. It suggests a pin which is going to be given to hardware and can't move. It would truncate CMA permanently and should be excluded. In gup slow path, where __gup_longterm_locked->check_and_migrate_cma_pages() handles FOLL_LONGTERM, but in fast path, there lacks such a check, which means a possible leak of CMA page to longterm pinned. Place a check in try_grab_compound_head() in the fast path to fix the leak, and if FOLL_LONGTERM happens on CMA, it will fall back to slow path to migrate the page. Some note about the check: Huge page's subpages have the same migrate type due to either allocation from a free_list[] or alloc_contig_range() with param MIGRATE_MOVABLE. So it is enough to check on a single subpage by is_migrate_cma_page(subpage) Signed-off-by:
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584876733-17405-3-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Pingfan Liu authored
To better reflect the held state of pages and make code self-explaining, rename nr as nr_pinned. Signed-off-by:
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1584876733-17405-2-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Claudio Imbrenda authored
With the introduction of protected KVM guests on s390 there is now a concept of inaccessible pages. These pages need to be made accessible before the host can access them. While cpu accesses will trigger a fault that can be resolved, I/O accesses will just fail. We need to add a callback into architecture code for places that will do I/O, namely when writeback is started or when a page reference is taken. This is not only to enable paging, file backing etc, it is also necessary to protect the host against a malicious user space. For example a bad QEMU could simply start direct I/O on such protected memory. We do not want userspace to be able to trigger I/O errors and thus the logic is "whenever somebody accesses that page (gup) or does I/O, make sure that this page can be accessed". When the guest tries to access that page we will wait in the page fault handler for writeback to have finished and for the page_ref to be the expected value. On s390x the function is not supposed to fail, so it is ok to use a WARN_ON on failure. If we ever need some more finegrained handling we can tackle this when we know the details. Signed-off-by:
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by:
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306132537.783769-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
As part of pin_user_pages() and related API calls, pages are "dma-pinned". For the case of compound pages of order > 1, the per-page accounting of dma pins is accomplished via the 3rd struct page in the compound page. In order to support debugging of any pin_user_pages()- related problems, enhance dump_page() so as to report the pin count in that case. Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst is also updated accordingly. Signed-off-by:
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211001536.1027652-13-jhubbard@nvidia.comSigned-off-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) authored
There was no protection against a corrupted struct page having an implausible compound_head(). Sanity check that a compound page has a head within reach of the maximum allocatable page (this will need to be adjusted if one of the plans to allocate 1GB pages comes to fruition). In addition, - Print the mapping pointer using %p insted of %px. The actual value of the pointer can be read out of the raw page dump and using %p gives a chance to correlate it with an earlier printk of the mapping pointer - Print the mapping pointer from the head page, not the tail page (the tail ->mapping pointer may be in use for other purposes, eg part of a list_head) - Print the order of the page for compound pages - Dump the raw head page as well as the raw page - Print the refcount from the head page, not the tail page Suggested-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
It's good to have basic unit test coverage of the new FOLL_PIN behavior. Fortunately, the gup_benchmark unit test is extremely fast (a few milliseconds), so adding it the the run_vmtests suite is going to cause no noticeable change in running time. So, add two new invocations to run_vmtests: 1) Run gup_benchmark with normal get_user_pages(). 2) Run gup_benchmark with pin_user_pages(). This is much like the first call, except that it sets FOLL_PIN. Running these two in quick succession also provide a visual comparison of the running times, which is convenient. The new invocations are fairly early in the run_vmtests script, because with test suites, it's usually preferable to put the shorter, faster tests first, all other things being equal. Signed-off-by:
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211001536.1027652-11-jhubbard@nvidia.comSigned-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
Up until now, gup_benchmark supported testing of the following kernel functions: * get_user_pages(): via the '-U' command line option * get_user_pages_longterm(): via the '-L' command line option * get_user_pages_fast(): as the default (no options required) Add test coverage for the new corresponding pin_*() functions: * pin_user_pages_fast(): via the '-a' command line option * pin_user_pages(): via the '-b' command line option Also, add an option for clarity: '-u' for what is now (still) the default choice: get_user_pages_fast(). Also, for the commands that set FOLL_PIN, verify that the pages really are dma-pinned, via the new is_dma_pinned() routine. Those commands are: PIN_FAST_BENCHMARK : calls pin_user_pages_fast() PIN_BENCHMARK : calls pin_user_pages() In between the calls to pin_*() and unpin_user_pages(), check each page: if page_maybe_dma_pinned() returns false, then WARN and return. Do this outside of the benchmark timestamps, so that it doesn't affect reported times. Signed-off-by: -
John Hubbard authored
Now that pages are "DMA-pinned" via pin_user_page*(), and unpinned via unpin_user_pages*(), we need some visibility into whether all of this is working correctly. Add two new fields to /proc/vmstat: nr_foll_pin_acquired nr_foll_pin_released These are documented in Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst. They represent the number of pages (since boot time) that have been pinned ("nr_foll_pin_acquired") and unpinned ("nr_foll_pin_released"), via pin_user_pages*() and unpin_user_pages*(). In the absence of long-running DMA or RDMA operations that hold pages pinned, the above two fields will normally be equal to each other. Also: update Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst, to remove an earlier (now confirmed untrue) claim about a performance problem with /proc/vmstat. Also: update Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst to rename the new /proc/vmstat entries, to the names listed here. Signed-off-by:Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
For huge pages (and in fact, any compound page), the GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS scheme tends to overflow too easily, each tail page increments the head page->_refcount by GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS (1024). That limits the number of huge pages that can be pinned. This patch removes that limitation, by using an exact form of pin counting for compound pages of order > 1. The "order > 1" is required because this approach uses the 3rd struct page in the compound page, and order 1 compound pages only have two pages, so that won't work there. A new struct page field, hpage_pinned_refcount, has been added, replacing a padding field in the union (so no new space is used). This enhancement also has a useful side effect: huge pages and compound pages (of order > 1) do not suffer from the "potential false positives" problem that is discussed in the page_dma_pinned() comment block. That is because these compound pages have extra space for tracking things, so they get exact pin counts instead of overloading page->_refcount. Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst is updated accordingly. Suggested-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
Add tracking of pages that were pinned via FOLL_PIN. This tracking is implemented via overloading of page->_refcount: pins are added by adding GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS (1024) to the refcount. This provides a fuzzy indication of pinning, and it can have false positives (and that's OK). Please see the pre-existing Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst for details. As mentioned in pin_user_pages.rst, callers who effectively set FOLL_PIN (typically via pin_user_pages*()) are required to ultimately free such pages via unpin_user_page(). Please also note the limitation, discussed in pin_user_pages.rst under the "TODO: for 1GB and larger huge pages" section. (That limitation will be removed in a following patch.) The effect of a FOLL_PIN flag is similar to that of FOLL_GET, and may be thought of as "FOLL_GET for DIO and/or RDMA use". Pages that have been pinned via FOLL_PIN are identifiable via a new function call: bool page_maybe_dma_pinned(struct page *page); What to do in response to encountering such a page, is left to later patchsets. There is discussion about this in [1], [2], [3], and [4]. This also changes a BUG_ON(), to a WARN_ON(), in follow_page_mask(). [1] Some slow progress on get_user_pages() (Apr 2, 2019): https://lwn.net/Articles/784574/ [2] DMA and get_user_pages() (LPC: Dec 12, 2018): https://lwn.net/Articles/774411/ [3] The trouble with get_user_pages() (Apr 30, 2018): https://lwn.net/Articles/753027/ [4] LWN kernel index: get_user_pages(): https://lwn.net/Kernel/Index/#Memory_management-get_user_pages [jhubbard@nvidia.com: add kerneldoc] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200307021157.235726-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com [imbrenda@linux.ibm.com: if pin fails, we need to unpin, a simple put_page will not be enough] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306132537.783769-2-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix put_compound_head defined but not used] Suggested-by:Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
Internal to mm/gup.c, require that get_user_pages_fast() and __get_user_pages_fast() identify themselves, by setting FOLL_GET. This is required in order to be able to make decisions based on "FOLL_PIN, or FOLL_GET, or both or neither are set", in upcoming patches. Signed-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
In preparation for an upcoming patch, send gup flags args to two more routines: put_compound_head(), and undo_dev_pagemap(). Signed-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
An upcoming patch requires subtracting a large chunk of refcounts from a page, and checking what the resulting refcount is. This is a little different than the usual "check for zero refcount" that many of the page ref functions already do. However, it is similar to a few other routines that (like this one) are generally useful for things such as 1-based refcounting. Add page_ref_sub_return(), that subtracts a chunk of refcounts atomically, and returns an atomic snapshot of the result. Signed-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
A subsequent patch requires access to gup flags, so pass the flags argument through to the __gup_device_* functions. Also placate checkpatch.pl by shortening a nearby line. Signed-off-by:
-
