- 06 Feb, 2003 40 commits
-
-
David Jeffery authored
This small patch does 2 things. It reworks the firmware/driver versioning messages to make them more understandable, and it fixes one case where the 64bit addressing changes caused error/success to not be properly reported to the serveraid tools.
-
David Jeffery authored
This large patch adds support for using 64bit addressing. Special thanks goes to Mike Anderson who did the initial versions of this patch.
-
David Jeffery authored
This large patch reworks much of the adapter initialization code. It splits the scsi initialization code from the pci initialization. It adds support for working with some future cards. It also removes the use of multiple pci_driver registrations and instead does its own adapter ordering.
-
David Jeffery authored
This small patch fixes the length of the IPS_ENQ struct. It was too short which can cause the adapter to write beyond the the end of the struct during driver initialization and corrupt part of memory.
-
http://linux-scsi.bkbits.net/scsi-for-linus-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
James Bottomley authored
into raven.il.steeleye.com:/home/jejb/BK/scsi-for-linus-2.5
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
I just couldn't see the mess anymore.. Nuke the ifdefs and use sane variable names. Some more small nitpicks but no behaviour changes at all.
-
Rusty Russell authored
From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com> Here are some help texts from 2.4.21-pre3 Configure.help which are needed in 2.5.59 drivers/scsi/Kconfig. Steven
-
Rusty Russell authored
From: Marcus Alanen <maalanen@ra.abo.fi> Remove check_region in favour of request_region. Free resources properly on error path. Horribly subtle ioremap/iounmap lurks here I think, in qla1280_pci_config(), which the below patch should take care of. I'm wondering if there couldn't / shouldn't be a better way to allocate resources. Obviously lots of drivers have broken error paths. Is this even necessary? Marcus # # create_patch: qla1280_release_on_error_path-2002-12-08-A.patch # Date: Sun Dec 8 22:32:33 EET 2002 #
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
It isn't used anywhere anymore
-
http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpiLinus Torvalds authored
into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Andy Grover authored
-
Randy Dunlap authored
The Stanford Checker found a memleak.
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/vojtech/x86-64Linus Torvalds authored
into home.transmeta.com:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Vojtech Pavlik authored
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> Fix "h_buffer_credits<0" assert failure during truncate. The bug occurs when the "i_blocks" count in the file's inode overflows past 2^31. That works fine most of the time, because i_blocks is an unsigned long, and should go up to 2^32; but there's a place in truncate where ext3 calculates the size of the next transaction chunk for the delete, and that mistakenly uses a signed long instead. Because the huge i_blocks gets cast to a negative value, ext3 does not reserve enough credits for the transaction and the above error results. This is usually only possible on filesystems corrupted for other reasons, but it is reproducible if you create a single, non-sparse file larger than 1TB on ext3 and then try to delete it.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from Manfred Spraul. Fixes a bug which was exposed by Zwane's hotplug CPU work. The cache_cache.array pointer is initially given a temp bootstrap area, which is later converted over to the final value after the CPU is brought up. But if slab is enhanced to permit cancellation of a CPU bringup, this pointer ends up pointing at stale memory. So reinitialise it by hand when kmem_cache_init() is run.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> This enables spinlock debuggng on uniprocessor builds, under CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK. The reason I want this is that one day we'll need to pull out the debugging support from the timer code which detects uninitialised timers. And once that has gone, uniprocessor developers and testers have no way of detecting uninitialised timers - there will be mysterious deadlocks on SMP machines. And there will surely be more uninitialised timers The patch also removes the last pieces of the support for including <asm/spinlock.h> directly. Doesn't work since (IIRC) 2.3.x
-
Andrew Morton authored
- Not everyone uses 160-column xterms. - Coding style consistency
-
Andrew Morton authored
If you attempt to perform a relocating 4k-aligned mremap and the new address for the map lands on top of a hugepage VMA, do_mremap() will attempt to perform a 4k-aligned unmap inside the hugetlb VMA. The hugetlb layer goes BUG. Fix that by trapping the poorly-aligned unmap attempt in do_munmap(). do_remap() will then fall through without having done anything to the place where it tests for a hugetlb VMA. It would be neater to perform these checks on entry to do_mremap(), but that would incur another VMA lookup. Also, if you attempt to perform a 4k-aligned and/or sized munmap() inside a hugepage VMA the same BUG happens. This patch fixes that too. This all means that an mremap attempt against a hugetlb area will fail, but only after having unmapped the source pages. That's a bit messy, but supporting hugetlb mremap doesn't seem worth it, and completely disallowing it will add overhead to normal mremaps.
-
Andrew Morton authored
This function is quite wrong - has an "=" where it should have a "-" and confuses PAGE_SIZE and HPAGE_SIZE in its address and file offset arithmetic.
-
Andrew Morton authored
- whitespace - remove unneeded spinlocking no-op.
-
Andrew Morton authored
If the underlying mapping was truncated and someone references the now-unmapped memory the kernel will enter handle_mm_fault() and will start instantiating PAGE_SIZE pte's inside the hugepage VMA. Everything goes generally pear-shaped. So trap this in handle_mm_fault(). It adds no overhead to non-hugepage builds. Another possible fix would be to not unmap the huge pages at all in truncate - just anonymise them. But I think we want full ftruncate semantics for hugepages for management purposes.
-
Andrew Morton authored
If someone maps a hugetlbfs file, then truncates it, then references the part of the mapping outside the truncation point, they take a pagefault and we end up hitting hugetlb_nopage(). We want to prevent this from ever happening. This patch just makes sure that all architectures have a goes-BUG hugetlb_nopage() to trap it.
-
Andrew Morton authored
- Remove quota code. - Remove extraneous copy-n-paste code from truncate: that's only for physically-backed filesystems. - Whitespace changes.
-
Andrew Morton authored
We're expanding hugetlbfs i_size in the wrong place. If someone attempts to mmap more pages than are available, i_size is updated to reflect the attempted mapping size. So set i_size only when pages are successfully added to the mapping. i_size handling at truncate time is still a bit wrong - if the mapping has pages at (say) page offset 100-200 and the mappng is truncated to (say) page offset 50, i_size should be set to zero. But it is instead set to 50*HPAGE_SIZE. That's harmless.
-
Andrew Morton authored
- Opening a hugetlbfs file O_TRUNC calls the generic vmtruncate() functions and nukes the kernel. Give S_ISREG hugetlbfs files a inode_operations, and hence a setattr which know how to handle these files. - Don't permit the user to truncate hugetlbfs files to sizes which are not a multiple of HPAGE_SIZE. - We don't support expanding in ftruncate(), so remove that code.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Having to specify the mapping address is a pain. Give hugetlbfs files a file_operations.get_unmapped_area(). The implementation is in hugetlbfs rather than in arch code because it's probably common to several architectures. If the architecture has special needs it can define HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA and go it alone. Just like HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA.
-
Andrew Morton authored
The odd thing about hugetlb is that it maintains its own freelist of pages. And it has to do that, else it would trivially run out of pages due to buddy fragmetation. So we we don't want callers of put_page() to be passing those pages to __free_pages_ok() on the final put(). So hugetlb installs a destructor in the compound pages to point at free_huge_page(), which knows how to put these pages back onto the free list. Also, don't mark hugepages as all PageReserved any more. That's preenting callers from doing proper refcounting. Any code which does a user pagetable walk and hits part of a hugepage will now handle it transparently.
-
Andrew Morton authored
We currently have a problem when things like ptrace, futexes and direct-io try to pin user pages. If the user's address is in a huge page we're elevting the refcount of a constituent 4k page, not the head page of the high-order allocation unit. To solve this, a generic way of handling higher-order pages has been implemented: - A higher-order page is called a "compound page". Chose this because "huge page", "large page", "super page", etc all seem to mean different things to different people. - The first (controlling) 4k page of a compound page is referred to as the "head" page. - The remaining pages are tail pages. All pages have PG_compound set. All pages have their lru.next pointing at the head page (even the head page has this). The head page's lru.prev, if non-zero, holds the address of the compound page's put_page() function. The order of the allocation is stored in the first tail page's lru.prev. This is only for debug at present. This usage means that zero-order pages may not be compound. The above relationships are established for _all_ higher-order pages in the page allocator. Which has some cost, but not much - another atomic op during fork(), mainly. This functionality is only enabled if CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, although it could be turned on permanently. There's a little extra cost in get_page/put_page. These changes do not preclude adding compound pages to the LRU in the future - we can add a new page flag to the head page and then move all the additional data to the first tail page's lru.next, lru.prev, list.next, list.prev, index, private, etc.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Seems that nobody has tested direct IO into hugetlb pages yet. The VFS gets upset about running set_page_dirty() against a non-uptodate page. So give hugetlbfs inodes a private no-op ->set_page_dirty() to isolate them from all that.
-
Andrew Morton authored
There are several places in which the return value from pte_chain_alloc() is not being checked, and one place in which a GFP_KERNEL allocatiopn is happening inside spinlock.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> The loop driver's loop over elements of bi_io_vec is in lo_send and lo_receive: iterating that same transfer bi_vcnt times at the level above is, er, excessive. (And no need to increment bi_idx here.)
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from rwhron@earthlink.net Micro-optimization of default_idle from -aa. current_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok is only false for some old 386/486 pcs.
-
Andrew Morton authored
ia32 and others can determine a page's hugeness by inspecting the pmd's value directly. No need to perform a VMA lookup against the user's virtual address. This patch ifdef's away the VMA-based implementation of hugepage-aware-follow_page for ia32 and replaces it with a pmd-based implementation. The intent is that architectures will implement one or the other. So the architecture either: 1: Implements hugepage_vma()/follow_huge_addr(), and stubs out pmd_huge()/follow_huge_pmd() or 2: Implements pmd_huge()/follow_huge_pmd(), and stubs out hugepage_vma()/follow_huge_addr()
-
Andrew Morton authored
Using a futex in a large page causes a kernel lockup in __pin_page() - because __pin_page's page revalidation uses follow_page(), and follow_page() doesn't work for hugepages. The patch fixes up follow_page() to return the appropriate 4k page for hugepages. This incurs a vma lookup for each follow_page(), which is considerable overhead in some situations. We only _need_ to do this if the architecture cannot determin a page's hugeness from the contents of the PMD. So this patch is a "reference" implementation for, say, PPC BAT-based hugepages.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> Hello All, We were looking at the performance impact of the IRQ routing from the 2.5.52 Linux kernel. This email includes some of our findings about the way the interrupts are getting moved in the 2.5.52 kernel. Also there is discussion and a patch for a new implementation. Let me know what you think at nitin.a.kamble@intel.com Current implementation: ====================== We have found that the existing implementation works well on IA32 SMP systems with light load of interrupts. Also we noticed that it is not working that well under heavy interrupt load conditions on these SMP systems. The observations are: * Interrupt load of each IRQ is getting balanced on CPUs independent of load of other IRQs. Also the current implementation moves the IRQs randomly. This works well when the interrupt load is light. But we start seeing imbalance of interrupt load with existence of multiple heavy interrupt sources. Frequently multiple heavily loaded IRQs gets moved to a single CPU while other CPUs stay very lightly loaded. To achieve a good interrupts load balance, it is important to consider the load of all the interrupts together. This further can be explained with an example of 4 CPUs and 4 heavy interrupt sources. With the existing random movement approach, the chance of each of these heavy interrupt sources moving to separate CPUs is: (4/4)*(3/4)*(2/4)*(1/4) = 3/16. It means 13/16 = 81.25% of the time the situation is, some CPUs are very lightly loaded and some are loaded with multiple heavy interrupts. This causes the interrupt load imbalance and results in less performance. In a case of 2 CPUs and 2 heavily loaded interrupt sources, this imbalance happens 1/2 = 50% of the times. This issue becomes more and more severe with increasing number of heavy interrupt sources. * Another interesting observation is: We cannot see the imbalance of the interrupt load from /proc/interrupts. (/proc/interrupts shows the cumulative load of interrupts on all CPUs.) If the interrupt load is imbalanced and this imbalance is getting rotated among CPUs continuously, then /proc/interrupts will still show that the interrupt load is going to processors very evenly. Currently at the frequency (HZ/50) at which IRQs are moved across CPUs, it is not possible to see any interrupt load imbalance happening. * We have also found that, in certain cases the static IRQ binding performs better than the existing kernel distribution of interrupt load. The reason is, in a well-balanced interrupt load situations, these interrupts are unnecessarily getting frequently moved across CPUs. This adds an extra overhead; also it takes off the CPU cache warmth benefits. This came out from the performance measurements done on a 4-way HT (8 logical processors) Pentium 4 Xeon system running 8 copies of netperf. The 4 NICs in the system taking different IRQs generated sizable interrupt load with the help of connected clients. Here the netperf transactions/sec throughput numbers observed are: IRQs nicely manually bound to CPUs: 56.20K The current kernel implementation of IRQ movement: 50.05K ----------------------- The static binding of IRQs has performed 12.28% better than the current IRQ movement implemented in the kernel. * The current implementation does not distinguish siblings from the HT (Hyper-Threading(tm)) enabled CPUs. It will be beneficial to balance the interrupt load with respect to processor packages first, and then among logical CPUs inside processor packages. For example if we have 2 heavy interrupt sources and 2 processor packages (4 logical CPUs); Assigning both the heavy interrupt sources in different processor packages is better, it will use different execution resources from the different processor packages. New revised implementation: ========================== We also have been working on a new implementation. The following points are in main focus. * At any moment heavily loaded IRQs are distributed to different CPUs to achieve as much balance as possible. * Lightly loaded interrupt sources are ignored from the load balancing, as they do not cause considerable imbalance. * When the heavy interrupt sources are balanced, they are not moved around. This also helps in keeping the CPU caches warm. * It has been made HT aware. While distributing the load, the load on a processor package to which the logical CPUs belong to is also considered. * In the situations of few (lesser than num_cpus) heavy interrupt sources, it is not possible to balance them evenly. In such case the existing code has been reused to move the interrupts. The randomness from the original code has been removed. * The time interval for redistribution has been made flexible. It varies as the system interrupt load changes. * A new kernel_thread is introduced to do the load balancing calculations for all the interrupt sources. It keeps the balanace_maps ready for interrupt handlers, keeping the overhead in the interrupt handling to minimum. * It allows the disabling of the IRQ distribution from the boot loader command line, if anybody wants to do it for any reason. * The algorithm also takes into account the static binding of interrupts to CPUs that user imposes from the /proc/irq/{n}/smp_affinity interface. Throughput numbers with the netperf setup for the new implementation: Current kernel IRQ balance implementation: 50.02K transactions/sec The new IRQ balance implementation: 56.01K transactions/sec --------------------- The performance improvement on P4 Xeon of 11.9% is observed. The new IRQ balance implementation also shows little performance improvement on P6 (Pentium II, III) systems. On a P6 system the netperf throughput numbers are: Current kernel IRQ balance implementation: 36.96K transactions/sec The new IRQ balance implementation: 37.65K transactions/sec --------------------- Here the performance improvement on P6 system of about 2% is observed. --------------------- Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> did some testing of this patch on a quad P4: I got a chance to run the NetBench benchmark with your patch on 2.5.54-mjb2 kernel. NetBench measures SMB/CIFS performance by using several SMB clients (in this case 44 Windows 2000 systems), sending SMB requests to a Linux server running Samba 2.2.3a+sendfile. Result is in throughput, Mbps. Generally the network traffic on the server is 60% recv, 40% tx. I believe we have very similar systems. Mine is a 4 x 1.6 GHz, 1 MB L3 P4 Xeon with 4 GB DDR memory (3.2 GB/sec I believe). The chipset is "Summit". I also have more than one Intel e1000 adapters. I decided to run a few configurations, first with just one adapter, with and without HT support in the kernel (acpi=off), then add another adapter and test again with/without HT. Here are the results: 4P, no HT, 1 x e1000, no kirq: 1214 Mbps, 4% idle 4P, no HT, 1 x e1000, kirq: 1223 Mbps, 4% idle, +0.74% I suppose we didn't see much of an improvement here because we never run into the situation where more than one interrupt with a high rate is routed to a single CPU on irq_balance. 4P, HT, 1 x e1000, no kirq: 1214 Mbps, 25% idle 4P, HT, 1 x e1000, kirq: 1220 Mbps, 30% idle, +0.49% Again, not much of a difference just yet, but lots of idle time. We may have reached the limit at which one logical CPU can process interrupts for an e1000 adapter. There are other things I can probably do to help this, like int delay, and NAPI, which I will get to eventually. 4P, HT, 2 x e1000, no kirq: 1269 Mbps, 23% idle 4P, HT, 2 x e1000, kirq: 1329 Mbps, 18% idle +4.7% OK, almost 5% better! Probably has to do with a couple of things; the fact that your code does not route two different interrupts to the same core/different logical cpus (quite obvious by looking at /proc/interrupts), and that more than one interrupt does not go to the same cpu if possible. I suspect irq_balance did some of those [bad] things some of the time, and we observed a bottleneck in int processing that was lower than with kirq. I don't think all of the idle time is because of a int processing bottleneck. I'm just not sure what it is yet :) Hopefully something will become obvious to me... Overall I like the way it works, and I believe it can be tweaked to work with NUMA when necessary. I hope to have access to a specweb system on a NUMA box soon, so we can verify that.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> there's a SMP race condition between __sync_single_inode (or __sync_one on 2.4.20) and __mark_inode_dirty. __mark_inode_dirty doesn't take inode spinlock. As we know -- unless you take a spinlock or use barrier, processor can change order of instructions. CPU 1 modify inode (but modifications are in cpu-local buffer and do not go to bus) calls __mark_inode_dirty it sees I_DIRTY and exits immediatelly CPU 2 takes spinlock calls __sync_single_inode inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY writes the inode (but does not see modifications by CPU 1 yet) CPU 1 flushes its write buffer to the bus inode is already written, clean, modifications done by CPU1 are lost The easiest fix would be to move the test inside spinlock in __mark_inode_dirty; if you do not want to suffer from performance loss, use the attached patches that use memory barriers to ensure ordering of reads and writes.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from "Stephen D. Smalley" <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil> This patch restores the LSM hook calls in sendfile to 2.5.59. The hook was previously added as of 2.5.29 but the hook calls in sendfile were subsequently lost as a result of the sendfile rewrite as of 2.5.30.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Patch from Roger Gammans <roger@computer-surgery.co.uk> Adds lots of API documentation to the JBD layer.
-