- 01 Sep, 2013 40 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
We only need an async starter if we can't make a GFP_NOFS allocation in our current path. This is the case for the endio stuff since it happens in IRQ context, but things like the caching thread workers and the delalloc flushers we can easily make this allocation and start threads right away. Also change the worker count for the caching thread pool. Traditionally we limited this to 2 since we took read locks while caching, but nowadays we do this lockless so there's no reason to limit the number of caching threads. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
This fixes a problem where if we fail a truncate we will leave the i_size set where we wanted to truncate to instead of where we were able to truncate to. Fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items do the disk_i_size update as it removes extents, that way it will always be consistent with where its extents are. Then if the truncate fails at all we can update the in-ram i_size with what we have on disk and delete the orphan item. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
If there's an ongoing transaction when the uuid scan kthread attempts to create one, the kthread will block, waiting for that transaction to finish while it's keeping locks on the tree root, and in turn the existing transaction is waiting for those locks to be free. The stack trace reported by the kernel follows. [36700.671601] INFO: task btrfs-uuid:15480 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [36700.671602] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [36700.671602] btrfs-uuid D 0000000000000000 0 15480 2 0x00000000 [36700.671604] ffff880710bd5b88 0000000000000046 ffff8803d36ba850 0000000000030000 [36700.671605] ffff8806d76dc530 ffff880710bd5fd8 ffff880710bd5fd8 ffff880710bd5fd8 [36700.671607] ffff8808098ac530 ffff8806d76dc530 ffff880710bd5b98 ffff8805e4508e40 [36700.671608] Call Trace: [36700.671610] [<ffffffff816f36b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [36700.671620] [<ffffffffa05a3bdf>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs] [36700.671623] [<ffffffff81066760>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [36700.671629] [<ffffffffa05a5b06>] start_transaction+0x3d6/0x530 [btrfs] [36700.671636] [<ffffffffa05bb1f4>] ? btrfs_get_token_32+0x64/0xf0 [btrfs] [36700.671642] [<ffffffffa05a5fbb>] btrfs_start_transaction+0x1b/0x20 [btrfs] [36700.671649] [<ffffffffa05c8a81>] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x211/0x3d0 [btrfs] [36700.671655] [<ffffffffa05c8870>] ? __btrfs_open_devices+0x2a0/0x2a0 [btrfs] [36700.671657] [<ffffffff81065fa0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [36700.671659] [<ffffffff81065ee0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [36700.671661] [<ffffffff816fcd1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [36700.671662] [<ffffffff81065ee0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [36700.671663] INFO: task btrfs:15481 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [36700.671664] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [36700.671665] btrfs D 0000000000000000 0 15481 15212 0x00000004 [36700.671666] ffff880248cbf4c8 0000000000000086 ffff8803d36ba700 ffff8801dbd5c280 [36700.671668] ffff880807815c40 ffff880248cbffd8 ffff880248cbffd8 ffff880248cbffd8 [36700.671669] ffff8805e86a0000 ffff880807815c40 ffff880248cbf4d8 ffff8801dbd5c280 [36700.671670] Call Trace: [36700.671672] [<ffffffff816f36b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 [36700.671679] [<ffffffffa05d9b0d>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x6d/0x230 [btrfs] [36700.671680] [<ffffffff81066760>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 [36700.671685] [<ffffffffa0582829>] btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0xb00 [btrfs] [36700.671691] [<ffffffffa05bd9de>] ? btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent+0x5e/0xb0 [btrfs] [36700.671698] [<ffffffffa05e3e54>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8c4/0xa80 [btrfs] [36700.671704] [<ffffffffa05e4362>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0xb2/0xf0 [btrfs] [36700.671710] [<ffffffffa05c4441>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs] [36700.671716] [<ffffffffa0594c82>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x562/0x650 [btrfs] [36700.671723] [<ffffffffa0610092>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x171/0x24b [btrfs] [36700.671729] [<ffffffffa05a4dde>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4fe/0xa10 [btrfs] [36700.671735] [<ffffffffa0610af3>] create_subvol+0x5c0/0x636 [btrfs] [36700.671742] [<ffffffffa05d49ff>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.60+0x33f/0x3f0 [btrfs] [36700.671747] [<ffffffffa05d4bf2>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x142/0x190 [btrfs] [36700.671752] [<ffffffffa05d4c6c>] ? btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2c/0x80 [btrfs] [36700.671757] [<ffffffffa05d4c9e>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x5e/0x80 [btrfs] [36700.671759] [<ffffffff8113a764>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x84/0x920 [36700.671764] [<ffffffffa05d87eb>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf0b/0x1d00 [btrfs] [36700.671766] [<ffffffff8113c120>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x210/0x310 [36700.671768] [<ffffffff816f83a4>] ? __do_page_fault+0x284/0x4e0 [36700.671770] [<ffffffff81180aa6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x550 [36700.671772] [<ffffffff81170fe3>] ? __sb_end_write+0x33/0x70 [36700.671774] [<ffffffff81180ff1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [36700.671775] [<ffffffff816fcdc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by:
Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
AFAICT chunk 0 is no longer special, and so it should be restriped just like every other chunk. One reason for this change is us refusing the relocation can lead to filesystems that can only be mounted ro, and never rw -- see the bugzilla [1] for details. The other reason is that device removal code is already doing this: it will happily relocate chunk 0 is part of shrinking the device. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60594Reported-by:
Xavier Bassery <xavier@bartica.org> Signed-off-by:
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
To get name of the file from a pathname let's use kbasename() helper. It allows to simplify code a bit. Signed-off-by:
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
now threads can return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_EXCL_RUN_IN_PROGRESS as defined in btrfs.h for the dev excl operation error in the FS, which means with this kernel would stop logging (almost an user error) into the /var/log/messages v2: accepts Josef' comment Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We currently have this problem where you can truncate pages that have not yet been written for an ordered extent. We do this because the truncate will be coming behind to clean us up anyway so what's the harm right? Well if truncate fails for whatever reason we leave an orphan item around for the file to be cleaned up later. But if the user goes and truncates up the file and tries to read from the area that had been discarded previously they will get a csum error because we never actually wrote that data out. This patch fixes this by allowing us to either discard the ordered extent completely, by which I mean we just free up the space we had allocated and not add the file extent, or adjust the length of the file extent we write. We do this by setting the length we truncated down to in the ordered extent, and then we set the file extent length and ram bytes to this length. The total disk space stays unchanged since we may be compressed and we can't just chop off the disk space, but at least this way the file extent only points to the valid data. Then when the file extent is free'd the extent and csums will be freed normally. This patch is needed for the next series which will give us more graceful recovery of failed truncates. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
All of these are logic checks to make sure we're not breaking anything, so convert them over to ASSERT(). Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
One of the complaints we get a lot is how many BUG_ON()'s we have. So to help with this I'm introducing a kconfig option to enable/disable a new ASSERT() mechanism much like what XFS does. This will allow us developers to still get our nice panics but allow users/distros to compile them out. With this we can go through and convert any BUG_ON()'s that we have to catch actual programming mistakes to the new ASSERT() and then fix everybody else to return errors. This will also allow developers to leave sanity checks in their new code to make sure we don't trip over problems while testing stuff and vetting new features. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I noticed that if I tried to mount a file system with -o degraded after having done it once already we would fail to mount. This is because the fs_devices->missing count was getting bumped everytime we mounted, but not getting reset whenever we unmounted. To fix this we just drop the missing count as we're closing devices to make sure this doesn't happen. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs() is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do it again in three more places. Signed-off-by:
Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
Mitch Harder noticed that the patch 3c64a1ab mentioned in the subject line was causing a kernel BUG() on snapshot deletion. The patch was wrong. It did not handle cached roots correctly. The check for root_refs == 0 was removed everywhere where btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() had been used to retrieve the root, because this check was already dealt with in btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name(). But in the case when the root was found in the cache, there was no such check. This patch adds the missing check in the case where the root is found in the cache. Reported-by:
Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
The second round uses btrfs_error() and return -EIO, the first round can handle write errors the same way. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
struct __prelim_ref is allocated and freed frequently when walking backref tree, using slab allocater can not only speed up allocating but also detect memory leaks. Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by:
Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Currently, only add_delayed_refs have to allocate with GFP_ATOMIC, So just pass arg 'gfp_t' to decide which allocation mode. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
The handler for the ioctl BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO was reading the number of devices before acquiring the device list mutex. This could lead to inconsistent results because the update of the device list and the number of devices counter (amongst other counters related to the device list) are updated in volumes.c while holding the device list mutex - except for 2 places, one was volumes.c:btrfs_prepare_sprout() and the other was volumes.c:device_list_add(). For example, if we have 2 devices, with IDs 1 and 2 and then add a new device, with ID 3, and while adding the device is in progress an BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl arrives, it could return a number of devices of 2 and a max dev id of 3. This would be incorrect. Also, this ioctl handler was reading the fsid while it can be updated concurrently. This can happen when while a new device is being added and the current filesystem is in seeding mode. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb1 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2 $ btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdb1 $ mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test $ btrfs device add /dev/sdb2 /mnt/test If during the last step a BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl was requested, it could read an fsid that was never valid (some bits part of the old fsid and others part of the new fsid). Also, it could read a number of devices that doesn't match the number of devices in the list and the max device id, as explained before. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
This change fixes an issue when removing a device and writing all super blocks run simultaneously. Here's the steps necessary for the issue to happen: 1) disk-io.c:write_all_supers() gets a number of N devices from the super_copy, so it will not panic if it fails to write super blocks for N - 1 devices; 2) Then it tries to acquire the device_list_mutex, but blocks because volumes.c:btrfs_rm_device() got it first; 3) btrfs_rm_device() removes the device from the list, then unlocks the mutex and after the unlock it updates the number of devices in super_copy to N - 1. 4) write_all_supers() finally acquires the mutex, iterates over all the devices in the list and gets N - 1 errors, that is, it failed to write super blocks to all the devices; 5) Because write_all_supers() thinks there are a total of N devices, it considers N - 1 errors to be ok, and therefore won't panic. So this change just makes sure that write_all_supers() reads the number of devices from super_copy after it acquires the device_list_mutex. Conversely, it changes btrfs_rm_device() to update the number of devices in super_copy before it releases the device list mutex. The code path to add a new device (volumes.c:btrfs_init_new_device), already has the right behaviour: it updates the number of devices in super_copy while holding the device_list_mutex. The only code path that doesn't lock the device list mutex before updating the number of devices in the super copy is disk-io.c:next_root_backup(), called by open_ctree() during mount time where concurrency issues can't happen. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user was reporting weird warnings from btrfs_put_delayed_ref() and I noticed that we were doing this list_del_init() on our head ref outside of delayed_refs->lock. This is a problem if we have people still on the list, we could end up modifying old pointers and such. Fix this by removing us from the list before we do our run_delayed_ref on our head ref. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We were unconditionally clearing our runtime flag on the inode on error when trying to insert an orphan item. This is wrong in the case of -EEXIST since we obviously have an orphan item. This was causing us to not do the correct cleanup of our orphan items which caused issues on cleanup. This happens because currently when truncate fails we just leave the orphan item on there so it can be cleaned up, so if we go to remove the file later we will hit this issue. What we do for truncate isn't right either, but we shouldn't screw this sort of thing up on error either, so fix this and then I'll fix truncate in a different patch. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Send was just sending everything it found, even if the extent was a hole. This is unpleasant for users, so just skip holes when we are sending. This will also skip sending prealloc extents since the send spec doesn't have a prealloc command. Eventually we will add a prealloc command and rev the send version so we can send down the prealloc info. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
The name buffer is not terminated by a '\0' character, therefore it needs to be printed with %.*s and use the length of the buffer. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
Signed-off-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
sector_t may be either "u64" (always 64 bit) or "unsigned long" (32 or 64 bit). Casting it to "unsigned long" will truncate it on 32-bit platforms where CONFIG_LBDAF=y. Cast to "unsigned long long" and format using "ll" instead. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE is "unsigned long" everywhere, so there's no need to cast it to "unsigned long". Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
Internally, btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned long, but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
Internally, btrfs_header_fsid() calculates an unsigned long, but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
Internally, btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned long, but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
All callers of btrfs_device_fsid() cast its return type to unsigned long. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
All callers of btrfs_device_uuid() cast its return type to unsigned long. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
mirror_num is always "int", hence don't cast it to "unsigned long long" and format it as a 64-bit number. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
PAGE_SIZE is "unsigned long" everywhere, so there's no need to cast it to "unsigned long long" and format it as a 64-bit number. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need a cast to print it. Signed-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
This issue is simple to reproduce and observe if kmemleak is enabled. Two simple ways to reproduce it: ** 1 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs balance start /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs ** 2 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ touch /mnt/btrfs/foobar $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/foobar $ umount /mnt/btrfs After a while, kmemleak reports the leak: $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak unreferenced object 0xffff880402b13e00 (size 128): comm "btrfs", pid 19621, jiffies 4341648183 (age 70057.844s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 fc c6 b1 04 88 ff ff 04 00 04 00 ad 4e ad de .............N.. backtrace: [<ffffffff817275a6>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50 [<ffffffff8117832b>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xeb/0x1d0 [<ffffffffa04db499>] btrfs_alloc_block_rsv+0x39/0x70 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04f8bad>] btrfs_orphan_add+0x13d/0x1b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04e2b13>] btrfs_remove_block_group+0x143/0x500 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0518158>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.63+0x618/0x790 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa051bc27>] btrfs_balance+0x8f7/0xe90 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa05240a0>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x250/0x550 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa05269ca>] btrfs_ioctl+0xdfa/0x25f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8119c936>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570 [<ffffffff8119cea1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [<ffffffff81750242>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff This affects btrfs-next, revision be8e3cd00d7293dd177e3f8a4a1645ce09ca3acb (Btrfs: separate out tests into their own directory). Signed-off-by: -
Ilya Dryomov authored
It turns out we don't properly rollback in-core btrfs_device state on umount. We zero out ->bdev, ->in_fs_metadata and that's about it. In particular, we don't zero out ->generation, and this can lead to us refusing a mount -- a non-NULL fs_devices->latest_bdev is essential, but btrfs_close_extra_devices will happily assign NULL to ->latest_bdev if the first device on the dev_list happens to be missing and consequently has no bdev attached. This happens because since commit a6b0d5c8 btrfs_close_extra_devices adjusts ->latest_bdev, and in doing that, relies on the ->generation. Fix this, and possibly other problems, by zeroing out everything except for what device_list_add sets, so that a mount right after insmod and 'btrfs dev scan' is no different from any later mount in this respect. Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
In the spirit of btrfs_alloc_device, add a helper for allocating and doing some common initialization of btrfs_fs_devices struct. Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
Currently btrfs_device is allocated ad-hoc in a few different places, and as a result not all fields are initialized properly. In particular, readahead state is only initialized in device_list_add (at scan time), and not in btrfs_init_new_device (when the new device is added with 'btrfs dev add'). Fix this by adding an allocation helper and switch everybody but __btrfs_close_devices to it. (__btrfs_close_devices is dealt with in a later commit.) Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
find_next_devid() knows which root to search, so it should take an fs_info instead of an arbitrary root. Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
If you start the replace procedure on a read only filesystem, at the end the procedure fails to write the updated dev_items to the chunk tree. The problem is that this error is not indicated except for a WARN_ON(). If the user now thinks that everything was done as expected and destroys the source device (with mkfs or with a hammer). The next mount fails with "failed to read chunk root" and the filesystem is gone. This commit adds code to fail the attempt to start the replace procedure if the filesystem is mounted read-only. Signed-off-by:
-
