Commits · 535f7ef2ab7dbfbcfe732ee7634faca21417a777 · nexedi / linux

28 Sep, 2020 31 commits

KVM: VMX: Move IRQ invocation to assembly subroutine · 535f7ef2

Sean Christopherson authored Sep 15, 2020

Move the asm blob that invokes the appropriate IRQ handler after VM-Exit
into a proper subroutine.  Unconditionally create a stack frame in the
subroutine so that, as objtool sees things, the function has standard
stack behavior.  The dynamic stack adjustment makes using unwind hints
problematic.
Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200915191505.10355-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

535f7ef2

KVM: x86: Add kvm_x86_ops hook to short circuit emulation · 09e3e2a1

Sean Christopherson authored Sep 15, 2020

Replace the existing kvm_x86_ops.need_emulation_on_page_fault() with a
more generic is_emulatable(), and unconditionally call the new function
in x86_emulate_instruction().

KVM will use the generic hook to support multiple security related
technologies that prevent emulation in one way or another. Similar to
the existing AMD #NPF case where emulation of the current instruction is
not possible due to lack of information, AMD's SEV-ES and Intel's SGX
and TDX will introduce scenarios where emulation is impossible due to
the guest's register state being inaccessible. And again similar to the
existing #NPF case, emulation can be initiated by kvm_mmu_page_fault(),
i.e. outside of the control of vendor-specific code.

While the cause and architecturally visible behavior of the various
cases are different, e.g. SGX will inject a #UD, AMD #NPF is a clean
resume or complete shutdown, and SEV-ES and TDX "return" an error, the
impact on the common emulation code is identical: KVM must stop
emulation immediately and resume the guest.

Query is_emulatable() in handle_ud() as well so that the
force_emulation_prefix code doesn't incorrectly modify RIP before
calling emulate_instruction() in the absurdly unlikely scenario that
KVM encounters forced emulation in conjunction with "do not emulate".

Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200915232702.15945-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

09e3e2a1

KVM: SVM: use __GFP_ZERO instead of clear_page() · ae5a2a39

Haiwei Li authored Sep 16, 2020

Use __GFP_ZERO while alloc_page().
Signed-off-by: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20200916083621.5512-1-lihaiwei.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

ae5a2a39

KVM: nVMX: KVM needs to unset "unrestricted guest" VM-execution control in... · bddd82d1

Krish Sadhukhan authored Sep 21, 2020

KVM: nVMX: KVM needs to unset "unrestricted guest" VM-execution control in vmcs02 if vmcs12 doesn't set it

Currently, prepare_vmcs02_early() does not check if the "unrestricted guest"
VM-execution control in vmcs12 is turned off and leaves the corresponding
bit on in vmcs02. Due to this setting, vmentry checks which are supposed to
render the nested guest state as invalid when this VM-execution control is
not set, are passing in hardware.

This patch turns off the "unrestricted guest" VM-execution control in vmcs02
if vmcs12 has turned it off.
Suggested-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <20200921081027.23047-2-krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

bddd82d1

KVM: x86: fix MSR_IA32_TSC read for nested migration · cc5b54dd

Maxim Levitsky authored Sep 21, 2020

MSR reads/writes should always access the L1 state, since the (nested)
hypervisor should intercept all the msrs it wants to adjust, and these
that it doesn't should be read by the guest as if the host had read it.

However IA32_TSC is an exception. Even when not intercepted, guest still
reads the value + TSC offset.
The write however does not take any TSC offset into account.

This is documented in Intel's SDM and seems also to happen on AMD as well.

This creates a problem when userspace wants to read the IA32_TSC value and then
write it. (e.g for migration)

In this case it reads L2 value but write is interpreted as an L1 value.
To fix this make the userspace initiated reads of IA32_TSC return L1 value
as well.

Huge thanks to Dave Gilbert for helping me understand this very confusing
semantic of MSR writes.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200921103805.9102-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

cc5b54dd

KVM: use struct_size() and flex_array_size() helpers in kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev() · 871c433b

Rustam Kovhaev authored Sep 18, 2020

Make use of the struct_size() helper to avoid any potential type
mistakes and protect against potential integer overflows
Make use of the flex_array_size() helper to calculate the size of a
flexible array member within an enclosing structure
Suggested-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rustam Kovhaev <rkovhaev@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20200918120500.954436-1-rkovhaev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>