- 28 Jan, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Hold onto the vm->mutex (to lock the drm_mm) to ensure that the rbtree is stable as we search it for our scratch node. Signed-off-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128183458.3860022-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
Don't confuse the poor developer by writing a negative value as a very large positive, as the flow of requests is already complex enough. Reported-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
The user (e.g. gem_eio) can manipulate the driver into wedging itself, allowing the user to trigger voluminous logging of inconsequential details. If we lift the dump to direct calls to intel_gt_set_wedged(), out of the intel_reset failure handling, we keep the detail logging for what we expect are true HW or test failures without being tricked. Reported-by:
Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127231540.3302516-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
We use the same interrupt mask for each engine, so define it once in a local and reuse. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We always use a deferred bottom-half (either tasklet or irq_work) for processing the response to an interrupt which means we can recombine the GT irq ack+handler into one. This simplicity is important in later patches as we will need to handle and then ack multiple interrupt levels before acking the GT and master interrupts. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We don't want to report errors on the internal contexts to userspace, suppressing their own, so treat them as simulated errors. These mostly arise inside selftests and so are simulated anyway. For the rest, we can rely on the normal debug channels in CI. Signed-off-by:
-
- 27 Jan, 2020 34 commits
-
-
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa authored
Engine context pinned in perf OA was set to same context id as the idle context. Set the context id to an unused value. Clear the sw context id field in lrc descriptor before ORing with ce->tag (Chris) Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/756Signed-off-by:
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Similar to commit ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") we have the same race of trying to pin the context underneath a mutex while allowing the decrement to be atomic outside of that mutex. This leads to the problem where two threads may simultaneously try to pin the context and the second not notice that they needed to repin the context. <2> [198.669621] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c:387! <4> [198.669703] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI <4> [198.669712] CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: gem_exec_create Tainted: G U W 5.5.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_7755+ #1 <4> [198.669723] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017 <4> [198.669776] RIP: 0010:timeline_advance+0x7b/0xe0 [i915] <4> [198.669785] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 10 f1 46 a0 48 c7 c7 70 1b 32 a0 e8 bb dd e7 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 d1 af e7 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 35 ef d8 e0 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c1 48 fa 49 a0 ba 84 01 00 00 48 c7 c6 10 f1 46 a0 48 <4> [198.669803] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004c3a38 EFLAGS: 00010296 <4> [198.669810] RAX: ffff888270b35140 RBX: ffff88826f32ee00 RCX: 0000000000000006 <4> [198.669818] RDX: 00000000000017c5 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009 <4> [198.669826] RBP: ffffc900004c3a64 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 <4> [198.669834] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88826f9b5980 <4> [198.669841] R13: 0000000000000cc0 R14: ffffc900004c3dc0 R15: ffff888253610068 <4> [198.669849] FS: 00007f63e663fe40(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [198.669857] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [198.669864] CR2: 00007f171f8e39a8 CR3: 000000026b1f6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 <4> [198.669872] Call Trace: <4> [198.669924] intel_timeline_get_seqno+0x12/0x40 [i915] <4> [198.669977] __i915_request_create+0x76/0x5a0 [i915] <4> [198.670024] i915_request_create+0x86/0x1c0 [i915] <4> [198.670068] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbf2/0x2500 [i915] <4> [198.670082] ? __lock_acquire+0x460/0x15d0 <4> [198.670128] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x470 [i915] <4> [198.670171] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] <4> [198.670181] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [198.670188] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [198.670233] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] Fixes: 84135022 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin") References: ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
As a safety net, flush the engine verifications and restore the kernel context. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/971Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by:
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3a89bf4c8b312c233e6b219e9c73203608c3eaec.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
The aux ch is used for more than DDC, so let's give it a better name. For maximum ease let's include both the AUX ch identifier and the port identifier (for cases where the VBT has redefined the relationship of the two). Signed-off-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by:
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
To make it easier to figure out what caused a particular debug message let's print out aux->name. v2: Rebase for drm_err() & co. Add some punctuation to the messages (Matt) Signed-off-by: -
Chris Wilson authored
As we use a mutex to serialise the first acquire (as it may be a lengthy operation), but only an atomic decrement for the release, we have to be careful in case a second thread races and completes both acquire/release as the first finishes its acquire. Thread A Thread B i915_active_acquire i915_active_acquire atomic_read() == 0 atomic_read() == 0 mutex_lock() mutex_lock() atomic_read() == 0 ref->active(); atomic_inc() mutex_unlock() atomic_read() == 1 i915_active_release atomic_dec_and_test() -> 0 ref->retire() atomic_inc() -> 1 mutex_unlock() So thread A has acquired the ref->active_count but since the ref was still active at the time, it did not initialise it. By switching the check inside the mutex to an atomic increment only if already active, we close the race. Fixes: c9ad602f ("drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree") Signed-off-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Replace the drm_connector loops with intel_connector loops to streamline the code. Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
We've added more internal things that use modeset locks and thus we need to be prepared for intel_atomic_check() grabbing more locks than what our initial drm_modeset_lock_all_ctx() took. So we're missing the backoff handling here. Also drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state() works against us by clearing state->acquire_ctx in anticipation of drm_atomic_helper_commit_duplicated_state() being used to commit the state. We could probably just reset acquire_ctx back, but instead let's just rewrite the whole thing without using either of those "helpers". There's also no need to add any connectors to the state here since we just want the new watermarks which don't depend on connectors. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
