- 26 Sep, 2013 40 commits
-
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
There are no more devices which require left to register which require a parent. This is part of the ux500 conversion over to Device Tree only booting. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
This is part of the ux500 conversion over to Device Tree only booting, but this stuff haven't been used for years. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
It's time to remove all ATAG support from ux500 and rely solely on Device Tree booting. This patch is part of that endeavour. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
These are now cared for from the Device Tree. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
We still need to utilise the AUXDATA system for the PRCMU to pass through platform data which can not be DT:ed i.e. regulator initialisation values. All we're doing in this patch is changing the comment header to be more accurate. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
MSP no longer requires clock-name bindings, so we need to move them to a more appropriate header indicating that we're still passing DMA related platform data to them. Signed-off-by:
-
Lee Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
-
