- 27 Aug, 2010 16 commits
-
-
Yinghai Lu authored
memblock_memory_size() will return memory size in memblock.memory.region. memblock_free_memory_size() will return free memory size in memblock.memory.region. So We can get exact reseved size in specified range. Set the size right after initmem_init(), because later bootmem API will get area above 16M. (except some fallback). Later after we remove the bootmem, We could call that just before paging_init(). Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
and some functions in e820.c that are not used anymore Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
1.include linux/memblock.h directly. so later could reduce e820.h reference. 2 this patch is done by sed scripts mainly -v2: use MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1UL Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range 2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range 3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range. 4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too. 5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will replace them all 6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care 7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill() so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch() -- corruption_check and mptable_update -v2: Move reserve_brk() early Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range() that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for memblock.memory.region array. and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area() So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area(). -v3: Move find_smp_config early To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable in right place. -v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in memblock.reserved already.. use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later. -v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit active_region for 32bit does include high pages need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped() -v6: Use current_limit instead -v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L -v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries -v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Also let memblock_x86_reserve_range/memblock_x86_free_range could print out name if memblock=debug is specified will also print ther name when reserve_memblock_area/free_memblock_area are called. -v2: according to Ingo, put " if (memblock_debug) " in one place Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
It will return memory size in specified range according to memblock.memory.region Try to share some code with memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range() by passing get_free to __memblock_x86_memory_in_range(). -v2: Ben want _in_range in the name instead of size Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
It will return free memory size in specified range. We can not use memory_size - reserved_size here, because some reserved area may not be in the scope of memblock.memory.region. Use memblock.memory.region subtracting memblock.reserved.region to get free range array. then count size of all free ranges. -v2: Ben insist on using _in_range Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
It can be used to find NODE_DATA for numa. Need to make sure early_node_map[] is filled before it is called, otherwise it will fallback to memblock_find_in_range(), with node range. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
According to node range in early_node_map[] with __memblock_find_in_range to find free range. Will be used by memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() memblock_x86_find_in_range_node will be used to find right buffer for NODE_DATA Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
memblock_x86_register_active_regions() will be used to fill early_node_map, the result will be memblock.memory.region AND numa data memblock_x86_hole_size will be used to find hole size on memblock.memory.region with specified range. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
get_free_all_memory_range is for CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y, and will be called by free_all_memory_core_early(). It will use early_node_map aka active ranges subtract memblock.reserved to get all free range, and those ranges will convert to slab pages. -v4: increase range size Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
They are wrappers for core versions, which take start/end/name instead of base/size. This will make x86 conversion eaasier. could add more debug print out -v2: change get_max_mapped() to memblock.default_alloc_limit according to Michael Ellerman and Ben change to memblock_x86_reserve_range and memblock_x86_free_range according to Michael Ellerman -v3: call check_and_double after reserve/free, so could avoid to use find_memblock_area. Suggested by Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
memblock_x86_to_bootmem() will reserve memblock.reserved.region in bootmem after bootmem is set up. We can use it to with all arches that support memblock later. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
It will be used memblock_x86_to_bootmem converting It is an wrapper for reserve_bootmem, and x86 64bit is using special one. Also clean up that version for x86_64. We don't need to take care of numa path for that, bootmem can handle it how Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
size is returned according free range. Will be used to find free ranges for early_memtest and memory corruption check Do not mess it up with lib/memblock.c yet. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
So we can avoid export memblock_reserved_init_regions() Suggested by Ben. -v2: use __init_memblock attribute Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 05 Aug, 2010 24 commits
-
-
Yinghai Lu authored
This is a wrapper for memblock_find_base() using slightly different arguments (start,end instead of start,size for example) in order to make it easier to convert existing arch/x86 code. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Arch code can define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK in asm/memblock.h, which in turns causes memblock code and data to go respectively into the .init and .initdata sections. This will be used by the x86 architecture. If ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK is defined, the debugfs files to inspect the memblock arrays after boot are not created. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
This should make it easier to catch/debug incorrect use when the CONFIG_ option isn't set. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
And ensure we don't hand out 0 as a valid allocation. We put the low limit at PAGE_SIZE arbitrarily. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
will used by x86 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node and nobootmem replacement Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
Print out the location info in addition to which array is being resized. Also use memblocK_dbg() to put that under control of the memblock_debug flag. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Yinghai Lu authored
This exposes memblock_debug and associated memblock_dbg() macro, along with memblock_can_resize so that x86 can use these when ported to use memblock Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
memblock_alloc_nid() used to fallback to allocating anywhere by using memblock_alloc() as a fallback. However, some of my previous patches limit memblock_alloc() to the region covered by MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE which is not quite what we want for memblock_alloc_try_nid(). So we fix it by explicitely using MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE. Not that so far only sparc uses memblock_alloc_nid() and it hasn't been updated to clamp the accessible zone yet. Thus the temporary "breakage" should have no effect. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
The former is now strict, it will fail if it cannot honor the allocation within the node, while the later implements the previous semantic which falls back to allocating anywhere. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
We now provide a default (weak) implementation of memblock_nid_range() which uses the early_pfn_map[] if CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP is set. Sparc still needs to use its own method due to the way the pages can be scattered between nodes. This implementation is inefficient due to our main algorithm and callback construct wanting to work on an ascending addresses bases while early_pfn_map[] would rather work with nid's (it's unsorted at that stage). But it should work and we can look into improving it subsequently, possibly using arch compile options to chose a different algorithm alltogether. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
To constraint the search of a region between two boundaries, which will be used by the new NUMA aware allocator among others. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Some archs such as ARM want to avoid coalescing accross things such as the lowmem/highmem boundary or similar. This provides the option to control it via an arch callback for which a weak default is provided which always allows coalescing. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
When one of the array gets full, we resize it. After much thinking and a few iterations of that code, I went back to on-demand resizing using the (new) internal memblock_find_base() function, which is pretty much what Yinghai initially proposed, though there some differences in the details. To work this relies on the default alloc limit being set sensibly by the architecture. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Some shuffling is needed for doing array resize so we may as well put some sense into the ordering of the functions in the whole memblock.c file. No code change. Added some comments. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
This will be used by the array resize code and might prove useful to some arch code as well at which point it can be made non-static. Also add comment as to why aligning size is important Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- v2. Fix loss of size alignment v3. Fix result code
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
It's a real PITA to have to search for it in the middle Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
This function will be used to locate a free area to put the new memblock arrays when attempting to resize them. memblock_alloc_region() is gone, the two callsites now call memblock_add_region(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- v2. Fix membase_alloc_nid_region() conversion
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Since we allocate one more than needed, why not do a bit of sanity checking here to ensure we don't walk past the end of the array ? Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
This is in preparation for having resizable arrays. Note that we still allocate one more than needed, this is unchanged from the previous implementation. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Right now, both the "memory" and "reserved" memblock_type structures have a "size" member. It represents the calculated memory size in the former case and is unused in the latter. This moves it out to the main memblock structure instead Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
Benjamin Herrenschmidt authored
Let's not waste space and cycles on archs that don't support >32-bit physical address space. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-