- 23 Feb, 2017 40 commits
-
-
Nicholas Piggin authored
These are no longer used outside mm/filemap.c, so un-export them and make them static where possible. These were exported specifically for NFS use in commit a4796e37 ("MM: export page_wakeup functions"). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170103182234.30141-3-npiggin@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Nicholas Piggin authored
Since commit 4f52b6bb ("NFS: Don't call COMMIT in ->releasepage()"), no tasks wait on PagePrivate. Thus the wake introduced in commit 95905446 ("NFS: avoid deadlocks with loop-back mounted NFS filesystems.") can be removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170103182234.30141-2-npiggin@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
Both mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active and mm_vmscan_lru_isolate have changed so the script needs to be update to reflect those changes Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170105151737.GU21618@dhcp22.suse.czSigned-off-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Acked-by:
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
Currently we have tracepoints for both active and inactive LRU lists reclaim but we do not have any which would tell us why we we decided to age the active list. Without that it is quite hard to diagnose active/inactive lists balancing. Add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low tracepoint to tell us this information. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-8-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive will currently report the number of scanned and reclaimed pages. This doesn't give us an idea how the reclaim went except for the overall effectiveness though. Export and show other counters which will tell us why we couldn't reclaim some pages. - nr_dirty, nr_writeback, nr_congested and nr_immediate tells us how many pages are blocked due to IO - nr_activate tells us how many pages were moved to the active list - nr_ref_keep reports how many pages are kept on the LRU due to references (mostly for the file pages which are about to go for another round through the inactive list) - nr_unmap_fail - how many pages failed to unmap All these are rather low level so they might change in future but the tracepoint is already implementation specific so no tools should be depending on its stability. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-7-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
shrink_page_list returns quite some counters back to its caller. Extract the existing 5 into struct reclaim_stat because this makes the code easier to follow and also allows further counters to be returned. While we are at it, make all of them unsigned rather than unsigned long as we do not really need full 64b for them (we never scan more than SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages at once). This should reduce some stack space. This patch shouldn't introduce any functional change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-6-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
mm_vmscan_lru_isolate currently prints only whether the LRU we isolate from is file or anonymous but we do not know which LRU this is. It is useful to know whether the list is active or inactive, since we are using the same function to isolate pages from both of them and it's hard to distinguish otherwise. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-5-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
mm_vmscan_lru_isolate shows the number of requested, scanned and taken pages. This is mostly OK but on 32b systems the number of scanned pages is quite misleading because it includes both the scanned and skipped pages. Moreover the skipped part is scaled based on the number of taken pages. Let's report the exact numbers without any additional logic and add the number of skipped pages. This should make the reported data much more easier to interpret. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-4-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports the number of - nr_taken is number of isolated pages from the active list - nr_referenced pages which tells us that we are hitting referenced pages which are deactivated. If this is a large part of the reported nr_deactivated pages then we might be hitting into the active list too early because they might be still part of the working set. This might help to debug performance issues. - nr_active pages which tells us how many pages are kept on the active list - mostly exec file backed pages. A high number can indicate that we might be trashing on executables. [mhocko@suse.com: update] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104135244.GJ25453@dhcp22.suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-3-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
Patch series "vm, vmscan: enahance vmscan tracepoints", v2. While debugging [2] I've realized that there is some room for improvements in the tracepoints set we offer currently. I had hard times to make any conclusion from the existing ones. The resulting problem turned out to be active list aging [3] and we are missing at least two tracepoints to debug such a problem. Some existing tracepoints could export more information to see _why_ the reclaim progress cannot be made not only _how much_ we could reclaim. The later could be seen quite reasonably from the vmstat counters already. It can be argued that we are showing too many implementation details in those tracepoints but I consider them way too lowlevel already to be usable by any kernel independent userspace. I would be _really_ surprised if anything but debugging tools have used them. Any feedback is highly appreciated. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161228153032.10821-1-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161215225702.GA27944@boerne.fritz.box [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161223105157.GB23109@dhcp22.suse.cz This patch (of 8): The trace point is not used since 925b7673 ("mm: make per-memcg LRU lists exclusive") so it can be removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-2-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
pmd_trans_unstable does an atomic read on the pmd so it doesn't require the pmd_lock for the same check. This also removes the special assumption that the mmap_sem is hold for writing if prot_numa is not set. userfaultfd will hold the mmap_sem only for reading in change_pte_range like prot_numa, but it will not set prot_numa. This is always a valid micro-optimization regardless of userfaultfd. [kirill@shutemov.name: drop unneeded pmd_trans_unstable(pmd) check after __split_huge_pmd()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170208120421.GE5578@node.shutemov.name Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-43-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Michael Rapoport <RAPOPORT@il.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
This will verify -EINVAL is returned with hugetlbfs/shmem and it'll do a functional test of UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE on anonymous memory. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-42-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
Add test for userfaultfd events used in non-cooperative scenario when the process that monitors the userfaultfd and handles user faults is not the same process that causes the page faults. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-41-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
With future addition of event tests, copy_page will be called with different userfault file descriptors Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-40-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
userfaultfd_open will be needed by the non cooperative selftest. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-39-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
Userland developers asked to be notified immediately by the UFFDIO_API ioctl if shmem missing mode is supported by userfaultfd in the running kernel. This avoids the need to run UFFDIO_REGISTER on a shmem virtual memory range to find out. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-38-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
If the atomic copy_user fails because of a real dangling userland pointer, we won't go back into the shmem method, so when the method returns it must not leave anything charged up, except the page itself. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-37-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
Use the non atomic version of __SetPageUptodate while the page is still private and not visible to lookup operations. Using the non atomic version after the page is already visible to lookups is unsafe as there would be concurrent lock_page operation modifying the page->flags while it runs. This solves a lockup in find_lock_entry with the userfaultfd_shmem selftest. userfaultfd_shm D14296 691 1 0x00000004 Call Trace: schedule+0x3d/0x90 schedule_timeout+0x228/0x420 io_schedule_timeout+0xa4/0x110 __lock_page+0x12d/0x170 find_lock_entry+0xa4/0x190 shmem_getpage_gfp+0xb9/0xc30 shmem_fault+0x70/0x1c0 __do_fault+0x21/0x150 handle_mm_fault+0xec9/0x1490 __do_page_fault+0x20d/0x520 trace_do_page_fault+0x61/0x270 do_async_page_fault+0x19/0x80 async_page_fault+0x25/0x30 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170116180408.12184-2-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
A VM_BUG_ON triggered on the shmem selftest. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-36-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The test verifies that anonymous shared mapping can be used with userfault using the existing testing method. The shared memory area is allocated using mmap(..., MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, ...) and released using madvise(MADV_REMOVE) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-35-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
When userfaultfd hugetlbfs support was originally added, it followed the pattern of anon mappings and did not support any vmas marked VM_SHARED. As such, support was only added for private mappings. Remove this limitation and support shared mappings. The primary functional change required is adding pages to the page cache. More subtle changes are required for huge page reservation handling in error paths. A lengthy comment in the code describes the reservation handling. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: update] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c9c8cafe-baa7-05b4-34ea-1dfa5523a85f@oracle.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487195210-12839-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
Expand the userfaultfd_register/unregister routines to allow shared memory VMAs. Currently, there is no UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE and write-protection support for shared memory VMAs, which is reflected in ioctl methods supported by uffdio_register. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-34-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
When processing a page fault in shared memory area for not present page, check the VMA determine if faults are to be handled by userfaultfd. If so, delegate the page fault to handle_userfault. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-33-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte implements low lever part of UFFDIO_COPY operation for shared memory VMAs. It's based on mcopy_atomic_pte with adjustments necessary for shared memory pages. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-32-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
It resolves this build error: All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/shmem.c: In function 'shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte': >> mm/shmem.c:2228:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'update_mmu_cache' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] update_mmu_cache(dst_vma, dst_addr, dst_pte); microblaze may have to be also updated to define it in asm/pgtable.h like the other archs, then this header inclusion can be removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-31-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by: -
Mike Rapoport authored
Currently userfault relies on vma_is_anonymous and vma_is_hugetlb to ensure compatibility of a VMA with userfault. Introduction of vma_is_shmem allows detection if tmpfs backed VMAs, so that they may be used with userfaultfd. Current implementation presumes usage of vma_is_shmem only by slow path routines in userfaultfd, therefore the vma_is_shmem is not made inline to leave the few remaining free bits in vm_flags. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-30-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte is the low level routine that implements the userfaultfd UFFDIO_COPY command. It is based on the existing mcopy_atomic_pte routine with modifications for shared memory pages. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-29-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
Check whether a VMA can be used with userfault in more compact way Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-28-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
Userland developers asked to be notified immediately by the UFFDIO_API ioctl if hugetlbfs missing mode is supported by userfaultfd in the running kernel. This avoids the need to run UFFDIO_REGISTER on a hugetlbfs virtual memory range to find out. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-27-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
If __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb exits with an error, put_page will be called if a huge page was allocated and needs to be freed. If a reservation was associated with the huge page, the PagePrivate flag will be set. Clear PagePrivate before calling put_page/free_huge_page so that the global reservation count is not incremented. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-26-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
Add support for VM_FAULT_RETRY to follow_hugetlb_page() so that get_user_pages_unlocked/locked and "nonblocking/FOLL_NOWAIT" features will work on hugetlbfs. This is required for fully functional userfaultfd non-present support on hugetlbfs. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-25-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Add routine userfaultfd_huge_must_wait which has the same functionality as the existing userfaultfd_must_wait routine. Only difference is that new routine must handle page table structure for hugepmd vmas. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-24-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Test userfaultfd hugetlb functionality by using the existing testing method (in userfaultfd.c). Instead of an anonymous memeory, a hugetlbfs file is mmap'ed private. In this way fallocate hole punch can be used to release pages. This is because madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) is not supported for huge pages. Use the same file, but create wrappers for allocating ranges and releasing pages. Compile userfaultfd.c with HUGETLB_TEST defined to produce an executable to test userfaultfd hugetlb functionality. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-23-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
Expand the userfaultfd_register/unregister routines to allow VM_HUGETLB vmas. huge page alignment checking is performed after a VM_HUGETLB vma is encountered. Also, since there is no UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE support for huge pages do not return that as a valid ioctl method for huge page ranges. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-22-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
When processing a hugetlb fault for no page present, check the vma to determine if faults are to be handled via userfaultfd. If so, drop the hugetlb_fault_mutex and call handle_userfault(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-21-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
The new routine copy_huge_page_from_user() uses kmap_atomic() to map PAGE_SIZE pages. However, this prevents page faults in the subsequent call to copy_from_user(). This is OK in the case where the routine is copied with mmap_sema held. However, in another case we want to allow page faults. So, add a new argument allow_pagefault to indicate if the routine should allow page faults. [dan.carpenter@oracle.com: unmap the correct pointer] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170113082608.GA3548@mwanda [akpm@linux-foundation.org: kunmap() takes a page*, per Hugh] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-20-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Michael Rapoport <RAPOPORT@il.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
__mcopy_atomic_hugetlb performs the UFFDIO_COPY operation for huge pages. It is based on the existing __mcopy_atomic routine for normal pages. Unlike normal pages, there is no huge page support for the UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE operation. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-19-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte is the low level routine that implements the userfaultfd UFFDIO_COPY command. It is based on the existing mcopy_atomic_pte routine with modifications for huge pages. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-18-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
userfaultfd UFFDIO_COPY allows user level code to copy data to a page at fault time. The data is copied from user space to a newly allocated huge page. The new routine copy_huge_page_from_user performs this copy. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-17-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andrea Arcangeli authored
Userfaults may still happen after the userfaultfd monitor thread received a UFFD_EVENT_MADVDONTNEED until UFFDIO_UNREGISTER is run. Wake any pending userfault within UFFDIO_UNREGISTER protected by the mmap_sem for writing, so they will not be reported to userland leading to UFFDIO_COPY returning -EINVAL (as the range was already unregistered) and they will not hang permanently either. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161216144821.5183-16-aarcange@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
