1. 10 Aug, 2009 1 commit
  2. 07 Aug, 2009 7 commits
  3. 06 Aug, 2009 9 commits
  4. 05 Aug, 2009 4 commits
    • Eric Dumazet's avatar
      phonet: phonet_device_get() fix · cf39c4c5
      Eric Dumazet authored
      net/phonet/pn_dev.c: In function `phonet_device_get':
      net/phonet/pn_dev.c:99: warning: 'dev' might be used uninitialized in this function
      Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarRémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cf39c4c5
    • Wei Yongjun's avatar
      dccp: missing destroy of percpu counter variable while unload module · 476181cb
      Wei Yongjun authored
      percpu counter dccp_orphan_count is init in dccp_init() by
      percpu_counter_init() while dccp module is loaded, but the
      destroy of it is missing while dccp module is unloaded. We
      can get the kernel WARNING about this. Reproduct by the
      following commands:
      
        $ modprobe dccp
        $ rmmod dccp
        $ modprobe dccp
      
      WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add+0x27/0x5c()
      Hardware name: VMware Virtual Platform
      list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (c080c0c4), but was (null). (next
      =ca7188cc).
      Modules linked in: dccp(+) nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss exportfs sunrpc
      Pid: 1956, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.31-rc5 #55
      Call Trace:
       [<c042f8fa>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x81
       [<c053a6cb>] ? __list_add+0x27/0x5c
       [<c042f94f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x29/0x2c
       [<c053a6cb>] __list_add+0x27/0x5c
       [<c053c9b3>] __percpu_counter_init+0x4d/0x5d
       [<ca9c90c7>] dccp_init+0x19/0x2ed [dccp]
       [<c0401141>] do_one_initcall+0x4f/0x111
       [<ca9c90ae>] ? dccp_init+0x0/0x2ed [dccp]
       [<c06971b5>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x26/0x48
       [<c0444943>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x45/0x51
       [<c04516f7>] sys_init_module+0xac/0x1bd
       [<c04028e4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
      Signed-off-by: default avatarWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      476181cb
    • Dhananjay Phadke's avatar
      netxen: fix dma mask update calculation · f60f7856
      Dhananjay Phadke authored
      Fix dma mask calculation that caps at 63-bit addressing even
      when firmware advertises full 64-bit support.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDhananjay Phadke <dhananjay@netxen.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f60f7856
    • Ingo Molnar's avatar
      net: Fix spinlock use in alloc_netdev_mq() · 0bf52b98
      Ingo Molnar authored
      -tip testing found this lockdep warning:
      
      [    2.272010] calling  net_dev_init+0x0/0x164 @ 1
      [    2.276033] device class 'net': registering
      [    2.280191] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
      [    2.284005] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
      [    2.284005] turning off the locking correctness validator.
      [    2.284005] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-rc5-tip #1145
      [    2.284005] Call Trace:
      [    2.284005]  [<7958eb4e>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
      [    2.284005]  [<7904f83c>] __lock_acquire+0x11b/0x622
      [    2.284005]  [<7908c9b7>] ? alloc_debug_processing+0xf9/0x144
      [    2.284005]  [<7904e2be>] ? mark_held_locks+0x3a/0x52
      [    2.284005]  [<7908dbc4>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xa8/0x13f
      [    2.284005]  [<7904e475>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xa2/0xc3
      [    2.284005]  [<7904fdf6>] lock_acquire+0xb3/0xd0
      [    2.284005]  [<79489678>] ? alloc_netdev_mq+0xf5/0x1ad
      [    2.284005]  [<79591514>] _spin_lock_bh+0x2d/0x5d
      [    2.284005]  [<79489678>] ? alloc_netdev_mq+0xf5/0x1ad
      [    2.284005]  [<79489678>] alloc_netdev_mq+0xf5/0x1ad
      [    2.284005]  [<793a38f2>] ? loopback_setup+0x0/0x74
      [    2.284005]  [<798eecd0>] loopback_net_init+0x20/0x5d
      [    2.284005]  [<79483efb>] register_pernet_device+0x23/0x4b
      [    2.284005]  [<798f5c9f>] net_dev_init+0x115/0x164
      [    2.284005]  [<7900104f>] do_one_initcall+0x4a/0x11a
      [    2.284005]  [<798f5b8a>] ? net_dev_init+0x0/0x164
      [    2.284005]  [<79066f6d>] ? register_irq_proc+0x8c/0xa8
      [    2.284005]  [<798cc29a>] do_basic_setup+0x42/0x52
      [    2.284005]  [<798cc30a>] kernel_init+0x60/0xa1
      [    2.284005]  [<798cc2aa>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0xa1
      [    2.284005]  [<79003e03>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
      [    2.284078] device: 'lo': device_add
      [    2.288248] initcall net_dev_init+0x0/0x164 returned 0 after 11718 usecs
      [    2.292010] calling  neigh_init+0x0/0x66 @ 1
      [    2.296010] initcall neigh_init+0x0/0x66 returned 0 after 0 usecs
      
      it's using an zero-initialized spinlock. This is a side-effect of:
      
              dev_unicast_init(dev);
      
      in alloc_netdev_mq() making use of dev->addr_list_lock.
      
      The device has just been allocated freshly, it's not accessible
      anywhere yet so no locking is needed at all - in fact it's wrong
      to lock it here (the lock isnt initialized yet).
      
      This bug was introduced via:
      
      | commit a6ac65db
      | Date:   Thu Jul 30 01:06:12 2009 +0000
      |
      |     net: restore the original spinlock to protect unicast list
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Acked-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0bf52b98
  5. 04 Aug, 2009 5 commits
  6. 03 Aug, 2009 10 commits
  7. 02 Aug, 2009 4 commits