- 11 Jun, 2014 40 commits
-
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
We were sending the necessary state changes to unset the mode, but never actually hit the big GO button unless another modeset happens afterwards. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
And at the same time, obey the spec better wrt out-of-range requests. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
SOR_PWR has no effect to power-off DP links, unlike other SOR protocols. Instead, on the source side, we cut power to the lanes after having put the sink into D3. Link training takes care of everything required to bring it back again. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This previously worked for the most part due to userspace doing a modeset in response to HPD interrupts. This will allow us to properly handle cases where sync is lost for other reasons, or if userspace isn't caring. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Some kind of update? Needed to make the power-down take effect at least. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
We want to be able to power down the lanes for DPMS off. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Same place as for SOR, between detach and attach phases. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This will, at some point, be used to replace various bits and pieces of code doing direct bios parsing. For now, it'll just be used for some DP improvements. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
There's also provisions to allow a pad to be locked with a specific routing, for an indefinite period of time. This will be used in future patches. The G94+ pad driver will now also power-down pads when not required. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This was a half-finished hack before, just enough to handle the shared aux/i2c pad thing on G94 and up. We got lucky with locking etc up until now, as this was (generally) all protected by the DRM mode_config lock. It's about to become a lot more likely to hit the races. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Re-uses the implementation's accessor functions rather than requiring and init/fini implementation for each chipset. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
We really want this for, at least, MST devices. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-